Is endozoochoric seed dispersal by large herbivores an evolutionary adaptation? Revisiting the Janzen's ‘Foliage is the fruit’ hypothesis

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.actao.2022.103888
Bogdan Jaroszewicz , Eric Coissac , Pierre Taberlet , Magdalena Czajkowska , Magdalena Świsłocka , Rafał Kowalczyk , Mirosław Ratkiewicz
{"title":"Is endozoochoric seed dispersal by large herbivores an evolutionary adaptation? Revisiting the Janzen's ‘Foliage is the fruit’ hypothesis","authors":"Bogdan Jaroszewicz ,&nbsp;Eric Coissac ,&nbsp;Pierre Taberlet ,&nbsp;Magdalena Czajkowska ,&nbsp;Magdalena Świsłocka ,&nbsp;Rafał Kowalczyk ,&nbsp;Mirosław Ratkiewicz","doi":"10.1016/j.actao.2022.103888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Many plant species develop fruits to attract animals that will eat them and then disperse the seeds. However, there are many plant species, whose seeds are dispersed endozoochorically, but their fruits are not particularly attractive to animals. The “Foliage is the fruit” (FF) hypothesis proposes that entire biomass of the plant exists to encourage herbivores to eat it, in order to enhance seed intake and dispersal (Janzen, 1984).</p><p>We tested the FF hypothesis by combining the results from the greenhouse seedling emergence method (GR) and DNA-metabarcoding of plant remnants in faeces of European moose (<em>Alces alces</em> L.). We processed 665 samples by the GR and 429 by the MB method, hypothesizing that if the safe passage of seeds through the gut of a large herbivore is the result of an evolutionary adaptation to endozoochoric dispersal, then the species composition of plants revealed by the two methods should largely overlap and the abundance of seedlings revealed by the GR method should be positively correlated in time with the read abundance of DNA of the same species. The large discrepancy between the lists of species detected by DNA metabarcoding and the GR method argues against the FF hypothesis. However, in the case of <em>Urtica dioica</em>, <em>Lysimachia vulgaris</em> and <em>Lythrum salicaria</em>, some clues of evolutionary adaptation to endozoochoric dispersal were revealed for: 1) their foliage is attractive to herbivores; 2) seeds are small, rounded in shape, yielded in large numbers and pass safely through the herbivore's gut; 3) the abundance of seeds (seedlings) was significantly and strongly influenced by the abundance of the plant biomass (DNA reads) in dung samples; 4) peaks in seed abundance and biomass consumption coincided in time. However, it should be considered that moose's diet is mostly composed of woody browse, which makes this animal not an optimal model for testing the Janzen's hypothesis and studies on typical grazers are needed in this respect.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1146609X22000789","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Many plant species develop fruits to attract animals that will eat them and then disperse the seeds. However, there are many plant species, whose seeds are dispersed endozoochorically, but their fruits are not particularly attractive to animals. The “Foliage is the fruit” (FF) hypothesis proposes that entire biomass of the plant exists to encourage herbivores to eat it, in order to enhance seed intake and dispersal (Janzen, 1984).

We tested the FF hypothesis by combining the results from the greenhouse seedling emergence method (GR) and DNA-metabarcoding of plant remnants in faeces of European moose (Alces alces L.). We processed 665 samples by the GR and 429 by the MB method, hypothesizing that if the safe passage of seeds through the gut of a large herbivore is the result of an evolutionary adaptation to endozoochoric dispersal, then the species composition of plants revealed by the two methods should largely overlap and the abundance of seedlings revealed by the GR method should be positively correlated in time with the read abundance of DNA of the same species. The large discrepancy between the lists of species detected by DNA metabarcoding and the GR method argues against the FF hypothesis. However, in the case of Urtica dioica, Lysimachia vulgaris and Lythrum salicaria, some clues of evolutionary adaptation to endozoochoric dispersal were revealed for: 1) their foliage is attractive to herbivores; 2) seeds are small, rounded in shape, yielded in large numbers and pass safely through the herbivore's gut; 3) the abundance of seeds (seedlings) was significantly and strongly influenced by the abundance of the plant biomass (DNA reads) in dung samples; 4) peaks in seed abundance and biomass consumption coincided in time. However, it should be considered that moose's diet is mostly composed of woody browse, which makes this animal not an optimal model for testing the Janzen's hypothesis and studies on typical grazers are needed in this respect.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大型食草动物在动物体内传播种子是一种进化适应吗?重新审视Janzen的“叶子是果实”假说
许多植物物种为了吸引动物吃掉果实,然后分散种子而结出果实。然而,也有许多植物物种,它们的种子在动物体内分散,但它们的果实对动物来说并不是特别有吸引力。“叶子就是果实”(FF)假说认为,植物的全部生物量的存在是为了鼓励食草动物食用它,为了增强种子的吸收和扩散(Janzen,1984)。我们结合温室出苗法(GR)和欧洲驼鹿粪便中植物残留物的DNA代谢编码(Alces Alces L.)的结果来检验FF假说。我们用GR法处理了665个样本,用MB法处理了429个样本,假设如果种子安全通过大型食草动物的肠道是对动物体内传播的进化适应的结果,那么这两种方法揭示的植物物种组成应该在很大程度上重叠,GR方法揭示的幼苗丰度应该与同一物种DNA的读取丰度在时间上呈正相关。DNA代谢编码和GR方法检测到的物种列表之间的巨大差异与FF假说相悖。然而,在球藻(Urtica dioica)、珍珠菜(Lycymachia vulgaris)和柳线虫(Lythrum salicaria)的案例中,揭示了一些进化适应动物体内传播的线索:1)它们的叶子对食草动物有吸引力;2) 种子小,形状圆形,产量大,可以安全地通过食草动物的肠道;3) 种子(幼苗)的丰度受到粪便样品中植物生物量(DNA读数)丰度的显著和强烈影响;4) 种子丰度和生物量消耗的峰值在时间上一致。然而,应该考虑的是,驼鹿的饮食主要由木本食物组成,这使得这种动物不是检验Janzen假说的最佳模型,在这方面需要对典型的食草动物进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Mentorship in academic musculoskeletal radiology: perspectives from a junior faculty member. Underlying synovial sarcoma undiagnosed for more than 20 years in a patient with regional pain: a case report. Sacrococcygeal chordoma with spontaneous regression due to a large hemorrhagic component. Associations of cumulative voriconazole dose, treatment duration, and alkaline phosphatase with voriconazole-induced periostitis. Can the presence of SLAP-5 lesions be predicted by using the critical shoulder angle in traumatic anterior shoulder instability?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1