Are lay expectations of inflation based on recall of specific prices? If so, how and under what conditions?

IF 2.5 2区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Journal of Economic Psychology Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.joep.2023.102662
Xiaoxiao Niu, Nigel Harvey
{"title":"Are lay expectations of inflation based on recall of specific prices? If so, how and under what conditions?","authors":"Xiaoxiao Niu,&nbsp;Nigel Harvey","doi":"10.1016/j.joep.2023.102662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In 2019 when inflation was low and stable, we compared people’s direct estimates of inflation with indirect estimates obtained by averaging their estimates of price changes in all 12 product categories on which the consumer price index is based. Indirect estimates were much higher than direct ones and the two types of estimate were uncorrelated. This is consistent with a price-free model in which direct estimates are not based on recall of prices but are determined by other information such as media reports. In May 2022 when inflation was high, expected to rise in the short-term, but highly unpredictable in the longer term, we found that direct and indirect estimates were very similar and highly correlated. This is consistent with a price-recall model in which a representative set of prices is used to estimate overall inflation. Finally, in September 2022 when inflation was fairly stable except for certain product categories (food) where prices were rising rapidly, we found that results were consistent with a third approach, the price-salience model; overall estimates of inflation are selectively influenced by price rises in those product categories where they are particularly high. People’s strategy for estimating inflation appears adapted to the prevailing inflation environment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48318,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167487023000636","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2019 when inflation was low and stable, we compared people’s direct estimates of inflation with indirect estimates obtained by averaging their estimates of price changes in all 12 product categories on which the consumer price index is based. Indirect estimates were much higher than direct ones and the two types of estimate were uncorrelated. This is consistent with a price-free model in which direct estimates are not based on recall of prices but are determined by other information such as media reports. In May 2022 when inflation was high, expected to rise in the short-term, but highly unpredictable in the longer term, we found that direct and indirect estimates were very similar and highly correlated. This is consistent with a price-recall model in which a representative set of prices is used to estimate overall inflation. Finally, in September 2022 when inflation was fairly stable except for certain product categories (food) where prices were rising rapidly, we found that results were consistent with a third approach, the price-salience model; overall estimates of inflation are selectively influenced by price rises in those product categories where they are particularly high. People’s strategy for estimating inflation appears adapted to the prevailing inflation environment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外行人对通货膨胀的预期是否基于对具体价格的回忆?如果是,如何以及在什么条件下?
在2019年通货膨胀率较低且稳定的情况下,我们将人们对通货膨胀的直接估计与间接估计进行了比较,间接估计是通过平均他们对消费者价格指数所依据的所有12种产品类别的价格变化的估计得到的。间接估计值远高于直接估计值,且两种估计值不相关。这与无价格模型是一致的,在无价格模型中,直接估计不是基于对价格的回忆,而是由媒体报道等其他信息决定的。在2022年5月,当通货膨胀处于高位时,预计短期内会上升,但从长期来看是高度不可预测的,我们发现直接和间接的估计非常相似,并且高度相关。这与价格召回模型是一致的,在价格召回模型中,使用一组有代表性的价格来估计总体通胀。最后,在2022年9月,通货膨胀相对稳定,除了某些产品类别(食品)的价格迅速上涨,我们发现结果与第三种方法一致,即价格显著性模型;通货膨胀的总体估计有选择地受到那些价格特别高的产品类别价格上涨的影响。人们估计通货膨胀的策略似乎适应了当前的通货膨胀环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
31.40%
发文量
69
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: The Journal aims to present research that will improve understanding of behavioral, in particular psychological, aspects of economic phenomena and processes. The Journal seeks to be a channel for the increased interest in using behavioral science methods for the study of economic behavior, and so to contribute to better solutions of societal problems, by stimulating new approaches and new theorizing about economic affairs. Economic psychology as a discipline studies the psychological mechanisms that underlie economic behavior. It deals with preferences, judgments, choices, economic interaction, and factors influencing these, as well as the consequences of judgements and decisions for economic processes and phenomena. This includes the impact of economic institutions upon human behavior and well-being. Studies in economic psychology may relate to different levels of aggregation, from the household and the individual consumer to the macro level of whole nations. Economic behavior in connection with inflation, unemployment, taxation, economic development, as well as consumer information and economic behavior in the market place are thus among the fields of interest. The journal also encourages submissions dealing with social interaction in economic contexts, like bargaining, negotiation, or group decision-making. The Journal of Economic Psychology contains: (a) novel reports of empirical (including: experimental) research on economic behavior; (b) replications studies; (c) assessments of the state of the art in economic psychology; (d) articles providing a theoretical perspective or a frame of reference for the study of economic behavior; (e) articles explaining the implications of theoretical developments for practical applications; (f) book reviews; (g) announcements of meetings, conferences and seminars.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Gender effects for loss aversion: A reconsideration A meta analysis of lost-letter field experiments Gender identity, salience of information, and tacit coordination: Gender differences in response to strategic uncertainty Pay all subjects or pay only some? An experiment on decision-making under risk and ambiguity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1