Más allá de la toma de decisiones: Una visión contextual y multidimensional de la autonomía del paciente

IF 1.1 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Healthcare Quality Research Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jhqr.2022.11.002
I. Arrieta Valero
{"title":"Más allá de la toma de decisiones: Una visión contextual y multidimensional de la autonomía del paciente","authors":"I. Arrieta Valero","doi":"10.1016/j.jhqr.2022.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There has been a trend in the clinical literature to reduce patient autonomy to decision-making, perhaps due to the influence of the philosophical-legal tradition and because of its initial hospital and emergency medicine focus. This paper presents a broader model of autonomy, which, in addition to strict medical issues and respect for freedom of choice, pays more attention to the specificities that characterise people in need of health care, i.e., the biological, psychological, and social aspects that allow or impede them a greater degree of autonomy. To that end we identify and describe all the stages or points at which the question arises of the patient's (in)capacity for self-management throughout the care process. This generates a more complex and multidimensional notion of patient autonomy which, in addition to the ability to make free and therapeutically informed decisions —<em>decisional autonomy</em>—, also includes the ability to carry out basic vital functions and tasks that can be performed by a statistical majority of people (such as eating, seeing, walking, understanding complex situations, etc.) —<em>functional autonomy</em>—, the patient's capacity to plan, sequence, and perform tasks related to the management of their chronic diseases, i.e., the capacity to implement the chosen therapeutic plan and maintain it over time—<em>executive autonomy</em>—, the patient's capacity to retain, understand and communicate coherently and understandably for others the principle identifying aspects that have characterised them during their lives—<em>narrative autonomy</em>—, and the ability of patients to access and control information relative to their situation for themselves—<em>informative autonomy</em>—.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37347,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2603647922000975","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There has been a trend in the clinical literature to reduce patient autonomy to decision-making, perhaps due to the influence of the philosophical-legal tradition and because of its initial hospital and emergency medicine focus. This paper presents a broader model of autonomy, which, in addition to strict medical issues and respect for freedom of choice, pays more attention to the specificities that characterise people in need of health care, i.e., the biological, psychological, and social aspects that allow or impede them a greater degree of autonomy. To that end we identify and describe all the stages or points at which the question arises of the patient's (in)capacity for self-management throughout the care process. This generates a more complex and multidimensional notion of patient autonomy which, in addition to the ability to make free and therapeutically informed decisions —decisional autonomy—, also includes the ability to carry out basic vital functions and tasks that can be performed by a statistical majority of people (such as eating, seeing, walking, understanding complex situations, etc.) —functional autonomy—, the patient's capacity to plan, sequence, and perform tasks related to the management of their chronic diseases, i.e., the capacity to implement the chosen therapeutic plan and maintain it over time—executive autonomy—, the patient's capacity to retain, understand and communicate coherently and understandably for others the principle identifying aspects that have characterised them during their lives—narrative autonomy—, and the ability of patients to access and control information relative to their situation for themselves—informative autonomy—.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超越决策:病人自主的背景和多维视角
在临床文献中,有一种趋势是减少患者的自主权,可能是由于哲学-法律传统的影响,也可能是由于其最初的医院和急诊医学重点。本文提出了一个更广泛的自主模式,除了严格的医疗问题和对选择自由的尊重之外,该模式更多地关注需要保健的人的特点,即允许或阻碍他们获得更大程度自治的生物、心理和社会方面。为此,我们确定和描述的所有阶段或点的问题出现在病人的(在)能力的自我管理在整个护理过程。这产生了一个更复杂和多维度的病人自主概念,除了能够做出自由和治疗上知情的决定——决策自主——还包括执行基本的重要功能和任务的能力,这些功能和任务可以由统计上的大多数人来执行(如吃饭、看东西、走路、理解复杂的情况等)——功能自主——病人计划、排序、并执行与慢性疾病管理相关的任务,即执行所选择的治疗计划并长期维持该计划的能力- - -执行自主权- - -病人保留、理解和连贯沟通的能力,并为他人理解识别他们生活中具有特征的各个方面的原则- - -叙述自主权,以及患者获取和控制与自身情况相关的信息的能力——信息自主权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
83
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Revista de Calidad Asistencial (Quality Healthcare) (RCA) is the official Journal of the Spanish Society of Quality Healthcare (Sociedad Española de Calidad Asistencial) (SECA) and is a tool for the dissemination of knowledge and reflection for the quality management of health services in Primary Care, as well as in Hospitals. It publishes articles associated with any aspect of research in the field of public health and health administration, including health education, epidemiology, medical statistics, health information, health economics, quality management, and health policies. The Journal publishes 6 issues, exclusively in electronic format. The Journal publishes, in Spanish, Original works, Special and Review Articles, as well as other sections. Articles are subjected to a rigorous, double blind, review process (peer review)
期刊最新文献
Letter to the Editor on "Loneliness impact on healthcare utilization in primary care: A retrospective study". [Learning from our mistakes: Notification of pediatric events through SiNASP in Galicia]. Analysis of quality of life of patients with refractive errors in India. A propósito de una encuesta sobre riesgos de la enfermedad de Chagas Utilidad del instrumento AGREE para la elaboración y la evaluación de protocolos clínicos: de la teoría a la práctica clínica
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1