{"title":"¿Qué determina la elección público-privada en la sanidad española?","authors":"J. Rama-Caamaño , O. Iglesias Sousa , J. Rama","doi":"10.1016/j.jhqr.2023.02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction and objectives</h3><p>The aim of the study was to analyze, which individual characteristics (sociodemographic, attitudinal and political factors) mediates in the choice in Spain in 2022, of a private versus public health care alternative for family doctor, doctor specialist, hospital admissions and emergencies.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Using the health barometers of the Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas (CIS), we carried out four logistic regressions (then, average marginal effects [AMEs]) whose dependent variables are the preference for a private choice of family doctor versus a public one, the preference for a private choice of doctor specialist versus a public one; the preference for a private choice of hospital admission versus a public one and the preference for a private choice of emergency admission versus a public one. The dependent variables are binary (1<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->private; 0<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->public). The sample consisted of more than 4,500 individuals older than 18<!--> <!-->years old distributed representatively throughout Spain.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The probability of choosing private rather than public is correlated with the age of the individual: those over 50<!--> <!-->years are less likely to opt for a private alternative (<em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->.01), as well as by ideology and satisfaction with the way that the national health system (NHS) works. Patients with a conservative ideology are more likely to choose private options (<em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->.01) and individuals with greater satisfaction with the NHS are less likely to choose private ones (<em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->.01).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Satisfaction with the NHS and patient ideology are the most relevant factors for private versus public choice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37347,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2603647923000039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction and objectives
The aim of the study was to analyze, which individual characteristics (sociodemographic, attitudinal and political factors) mediates in the choice in Spain in 2022, of a private versus public health care alternative for family doctor, doctor specialist, hospital admissions and emergencies.
Methods
Using the health barometers of the Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas (CIS), we carried out four logistic regressions (then, average marginal effects [AMEs]) whose dependent variables are the preference for a private choice of family doctor versus a public one, the preference for a private choice of doctor specialist versus a public one; the preference for a private choice of hospital admission versus a public one and the preference for a private choice of emergency admission versus a public one. The dependent variables are binary (1 = private; 0 = public). The sample consisted of more than 4,500 individuals older than 18 years old distributed representatively throughout Spain.
Results
The probability of choosing private rather than public is correlated with the age of the individual: those over 50 years are less likely to opt for a private alternative (P < .01), as well as by ideology and satisfaction with the way that the national health system (NHS) works. Patients with a conservative ideology are more likely to choose private options (P < .01) and individuals with greater satisfaction with the NHS are less likely to choose private ones (P < .01).
Conclusions
Satisfaction with the NHS and patient ideology are the most relevant factors for private versus public choice.
期刊介绍:
Revista de Calidad Asistencial (Quality Healthcare) (RCA) is the official Journal of the Spanish Society of Quality Healthcare (Sociedad Española de Calidad Asistencial) (SECA) and is a tool for the dissemination of knowledge and reflection for the quality management of health services in Primary Care, as well as in Hospitals. It publishes articles associated with any aspect of research in the field of public health and health administration, including health education, epidemiology, medical statistics, health information, health economics, quality management, and health policies. The Journal publishes 6 issues, exclusively in electronic format. The Journal publishes, in Spanish, Original works, Special and Review Articles, as well as other sections. Articles are subjected to a rigorous, double blind, review process (peer review)