Impacto de los «daily huddle» en la seguridad del paciente pediátrico hospitalizado

IF 1.1 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Healthcare Quality Research Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jhqr.2023.03.002
R. Rodríguez-Fernández , L. Sánchez-Barriopedro , A. Merino-Hernández , M.I. González-Sánchez , J. Pérez-Moreno , B. Toledo del Castillo , F. González Martínez , C. Díaz de Mera Aranda , T. Eizaguirre Fernández-Palacios , A. Dominguez Rodríguez , E. Tierraseca Serrano , M. Sánchez Jiménez , O. Sanchez Lloreda , M. Carballo Nuria
{"title":"Impacto de los «daily huddle» en la seguridad del paciente pediátrico hospitalizado","authors":"R. Rodríguez-Fernández ,&nbsp;L. Sánchez-Barriopedro ,&nbsp;A. Merino-Hernández ,&nbsp;M.I. González-Sánchez ,&nbsp;J. Pérez-Moreno ,&nbsp;B. Toledo del Castillo ,&nbsp;F. González Martínez ,&nbsp;C. Díaz de Mera Aranda ,&nbsp;T. Eizaguirre Fernández-Palacios ,&nbsp;A. Dominguez Rodríguez ,&nbsp;E. Tierraseca Serrano ,&nbsp;M. Sánchez Jiménez ,&nbsp;O. Sanchez Lloreda ,&nbsp;M. Carballo Nuria","doi":"10.1016/j.jhqr.2023.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>In 2017, the Joint Commission proposed daily meetings called “huddle” as an indicator of quality of care. They are brief daily meetings of the multidisciplinary team, where security problems of the last 24<!--> <!-->h are shared and risks are anticipated. The objectives were to describe the most frequent safety events in Pediatric wards, implement improvements in patient safety, improve team communication, implement international safety protocols, and measure the satisfaction of the staff involved.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>Prospective, longitudinal and analytical design (June 2020–February 2022), with previous educational intervention. Safety incidents, data related to unequivocal identification, allergy and pain records, data from the Scale for the Early Detection of Deficiencies (SAPI) and the Scale for the Secure Transmission of Information (SBAR) were collected. The degree of satisfaction of the professionals was evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Three hundred forty-eight security incidents were recorded. Medication prescription or administration errors stood out (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->103). Drug prescription or administration errors stood out (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->103), especially those related to high-risk medication: acetaminophen (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->14) (×10 doses of acetaminophen; <em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->6), insulin (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->6), potassium (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->5) and morphic (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->5). An improvement was observed in the pain record; 5% versus 80% (<em>P</em>&lt;.01), in the SAPI registry 5% versus 70% (<em>P</em>&lt;.01), in SBAER scale 40% vs 100% (<em>P</em>&lt;.01), in unequivocal identification of the patient 80% versus 100%; (<em>P</em>&lt;.01) and in the application of analgesic techniques 60% versus 85% (<em>P</em>=.01). In the survey of professionals, a degree of satisfaction of 8 (7–9.5)/10 was obtained.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Huddles made it possible to learn about security events in our environment and increase the safety of hospitalized patients, and improved communication and the relationship of the multidisciplinary team.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37347,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2603647923000179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

In 2017, the Joint Commission proposed daily meetings called “huddle” as an indicator of quality of care. They are brief daily meetings of the multidisciplinary team, where security problems of the last 24 h are shared and risks are anticipated. The objectives were to describe the most frequent safety events in Pediatric wards, implement improvements in patient safety, improve team communication, implement international safety protocols, and measure the satisfaction of the staff involved.

Material and methods

Prospective, longitudinal and analytical design (June 2020–February 2022), with previous educational intervention. Safety incidents, data related to unequivocal identification, allergy and pain records, data from the Scale for the Early Detection of Deficiencies (SAPI) and the Scale for the Secure Transmission of Information (SBAR) were collected. The degree of satisfaction of the professionals was evaluated.

Results

Three hundred forty-eight security incidents were recorded. Medication prescription or administration errors stood out (n = 103). Drug prescription or administration errors stood out (n = 103), especially those related to high-risk medication: acetaminophen (n = 14) (×10 doses of acetaminophen; n = 6), insulin (n = 6), potassium (n = 5) and morphic (n = 5). An improvement was observed in the pain record; 5% versus 80% (P<.01), in the SAPI registry 5% versus 70% (P<.01), in SBAER scale 40% vs 100% (P<.01), in unequivocal identification of the patient 80% versus 100%; (P<.01) and in the application of analgesic techniques 60% versus 85% (P=.01). In the survey of professionals, a degree of satisfaction of 8 (7–9.5)/10 was obtained.

Conclusions

Huddles made it possible to learn about security events in our environment and increase the safety of hospitalized patients, and improved communication and the relationship of the multidisciplinary team.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
每日拥挤对儿科住院患者安全的影响
2017年,联合委员会提议每天召开一次名为“抱团”的会议,作为衡量护理质量的指标。它们是多学科团队的每日简短会议,在会上分享过去24小时的安全问题并预测风险。目的是描述儿科病房最常见的安全事件,实施对患者安全的改进,改善团队沟通,实施国际安全协议,并衡量相关工作人员的满意度。材料和方法前瞻性、纵向和分析性设计(2020年6月- 2022年2月),既往教育干预。收集了安全事故、与明确识别、过敏和疼痛记录相关的数据、早期发现缺陷量表(SAPI)和信息安全传输量表(SBAR)的数据。对专业人员的满意度进行了评价。结果共记录安全事件348起。用药处方或给药错误突出(n = 103)。药物处方或给药错误突出(n = 103),特别是与高危药物有关的错误:对乙酰氨基酚(n = 14) (×10剂量的对乙酰氨基酚;n = 6),胰岛素(n = 6),钾(n = 5)和吗啡(n = 5)。疼痛记录有所改善;5%对80% (P<.01),在SAPI登记中5%对70% (P<.01),在SBAER量表中40%对100% (P<.01),在明确识别患者中80%对100%;(P= 0.01),在镇痛技术的应用中,60%对85% (P= 0.01)。在对专业人员的调查中,满意度为8(7-9.5)/10。结论shuddles使我们能够了解我们环境中的安全事件,提高住院患者的安全性,并改善了多学科团队的沟通和关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
83
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Revista de Calidad Asistencial (Quality Healthcare) (RCA) is the official Journal of the Spanish Society of Quality Healthcare (Sociedad Española de Calidad Asistencial) (SECA) and is a tool for the dissemination of knowledge and reflection for the quality management of health services in Primary Care, as well as in Hospitals. It publishes articles associated with any aspect of research in the field of public health and health administration, including health education, epidemiology, medical statistics, health information, health economics, quality management, and health policies. The Journal publishes 6 issues, exclusively in electronic format. The Journal publishes, in Spanish, Original works, Special and Review Articles, as well as other sections. Articles are subjected to a rigorous, double blind, review process (peer review)
期刊最新文献
[A practical model to implement the patient participation in tertiary hospitals (ICE model)]. [Integrated social value generated in a specialized hospital for chronic patients]. Determinants of citizens' choice between public and private hospitals. Letter to the Editor on "Loneliness impact on healthcare utilization in primary care: A retrospective study". [Learning from our mistakes: Notification of pediatric events through SiNASP in Galicia].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1