Outcomes of trauma patients on chronic antithrombotic therapies in a trauma center in a rural state

IF 0.6 Q4 SURGERY Surgery in practice and science Pub Date : 2023-10-04 DOI:10.1016/j.sipas.2023.100221
Benjamin Moore , Hanna Jensen MD PhD , Karan Patel , Zeel Modi , Rebecca J Reif , Shibani Lal , Stephen M Bowman , Melissa Kost , Kyle J. Kalkwarf , Joseph Margolick , Avi Bhavaraju , Howard L. Corwin
{"title":"Outcomes of trauma patients on chronic antithrombotic therapies in a trauma center in a rural state","authors":"Benjamin Moore ,&nbsp;Hanna Jensen MD PhD ,&nbsp;Karan Patel ,&nbsp;Zeel Modi ,&nbsp;Rebecca J Reif ,&nbsp;Shibani Lal ,&nbsp;Stephen M Bowman ,&nbsp;Melissa Kost ,&nbsp;Kyle J. Kalkwarf ,&nbsp;Joseph Margolick ,&nbsp;Avi Bhavaraju ,&nbsp;Howard L. Corwin","doi":"10.1016/j.sipas.2023.100221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The number of trauma patients presenting with chronic antithrombotic therapy is on the rise. The risk of hemorrhage, the leading cause of death in trauma patients, increases for those on such therapy. This study sought to compare the clinical outcomes of patients on warfarin, direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC), or antiplatelet agents.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted on adult patients admitted to a Level 1 trauma center with pre-admission antithrombotic therapy. Patients were divided into those on warfarin, DOACs, and antiplatelet agents. The primary outcomes measured were hospital mortality, total blood products received, hospital length of stay (LOS), and ICU LOS.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>738 patients were included in the study: 191 (26 %) warfarin, 260 (35 %) DOACs, and 287 (39 %) antiplatelet. There were no differences in the demographic variables between study groups. The Injury Severity Score (ISS) was similar across the three groups as well as blood product usage, reversal agent usage, and mean hospital stay. Multivariable regression showed patients with pre-admission antiplatelet usage were more likely to have a shorter ICU LOS than those on warfarin (<em>p</em> = 0.048).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Blood product and reversal agent use was similar between patients on warfarin, DOACs, or antiplatelet agents. Patients on antiplatelet agents had a shorter ICU stay than the warfarin group, the only significant difference observed. Our results indicate similar safety profiles of antithrombotic medications in a generic trauma population, likely due to institutional protocols to increase responsiveness and immediate availability of resources when the patient has known anticoagulation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74890,"journal":{"name":"Surgery in practice and science","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 100221"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery in practice and science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262023000670","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The number of trauma patients presenting with chronic antithrombotic therapy is on the rise. The risk of hemorrhage, the leading cause of death in trauma patients, increases for those on such therapy. This study sought to compare the clinical outcomes of patients on warfarin, direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC), or antiplatelet agents.

Methods

A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted on adult patients admitted to a Level 1 trauma center with pre-admission antithrombotic therapy. Patients were divided into those on warfarin, DOACs, and antiplatelet agents. The primary outcomes measured were hospital mortality, total blood products received, hospital length of stay (LOS), and ICU LOS.

Results

738 patients were included in the study: 191 (26 %) warfarin, 260 (35 %) DOACs, and 287 (39 %) antiplatelet. There were no differences in the demographic variables between study groups. The Injury Severity Score (ISS) was similar across the three groups as well as blood product usage, reversal agent usage, and mean hospital stay. Multivariable regression showed patients with pre-admission antiplatelet usage were more likely to have a shorter ICU LOS than those on warfarin (p = 0.048).

Conclusion

Blood product and reversal agent use was similar between patients on warfarin, DOACs, or antiplatelet agents. Patients on antiplatelet agents had a shorter ICU stay than the warfarin group, the only significant difference observed. Our results indicate similar safety profiles of antithrombotic medications in a generic trauma population, likely due to institutional protocols to increase responsiveness and immediate availability of resources when the patient has known anticoagulation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
农村创伤中心创伤患者慢性抗血栓治疗的结果
目的采用慢性抗血栓治疗的创伤患者数量呈上升趋势。出血是创伤患者死亡的主要原因,接受这种治疗的患者出血的风险会增加。本研究旨在比较服用华法林、直接口服抗凝血剂(DOAC)或抗血小板药物的患者的临床结果。方法对一级创伤中心接受入院前抗凝治疗的成年患者进行回顾性队列分析。将患者分为服用华法林、DOAC和抗血小板药物的患者。测量的主要结果是住院死亡率、接受的血液制品总量、住院时间(LOS)和ICU LOS。结果738名患者被纳入研究:191名(26%)华法林、260名(35%)DOAC和287名(39%)抗血小板药物。研究组之间的人口统计学变量没有差异。三组的损伤严重程度评分(ISS)以及血液制品的使用、拮抗剂的使用和平均住院时间相似。多变量回归显示,入院前使用抗血小板药物的患者比使用华法林的患者更有可能缩短ICU LOS(p=0.048)。服用抗血小板药物的患者的ICU住院时间比华法林组短,这是唯一观察到的显著差异。我们的研究结果表明,在普通创伤人群中,抗血栓药物的安全性相似,这可能是由于当患者已知抗凝时,机构方案可以提高反应性和立即获得资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
38 days
期刊最新文献
Emergency laparotomy preoperative risk assessment tool performance: A systematic review Letter to the Editor on “The pulmonary contusion score: Development of asimple scoring system for blunt lung injury” Prevalence and associated factors of acute postoperative pain in adult surgical patients: A prospective study Advances and results in omental patch repair of gastrointestinal perforations: A narrative review Practical evaluation of risk factors in patients with osteoporosis-induced thoracic and lumbar vertebral compression fractures requiring surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1