Interorganizational triads for foreign-market entry: Partnerships among Western, bridge-economy, and local VCs in mainland China

IF 7.7 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Business Venturing Pub Date : 2023-10-12 DOI:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2023.106363
Jing Zhang , Wei Zhang , Andreas Schwab
{"title":"Interorganizational triads for foreign-market entry: Partnerships among Western, bridge-economy, and local VCs in mainland China","authors":"Jing Zhang ,&nbsp;Wei Zhang ,&nbsp;Andreas Schwab","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusvent.2023.106363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study introduces the novel construct of bridge-economy partners, which can assist Western firms in learning how to collaborate with local partners when entering unfamiliar foreign countries that have substantially different socioeconomic characteristics. We offer initial empirical evidence regarding the relevance of establishing such interorganizational partnership triads among Western, bridge-economy, and local firms for the entries of Western venture capital firms (VCs) into Mainland China between 1997 and 2008. Venture age, regional legal maturity, and the Western VCs' accumulated local experience are identified as relevant contingency factors for the likelihood of adopting this type of collaboration, which involves partners from three different types of economies. We supplement our quantitative analyses with anecdotal qualitative evidence from interviews with VC executives and fund managers.</p></div><div><h3>Executive summary</h3><p>This study introduces the novel construct of bridge-economy partners and outlines their potentially beneficial roles in the context of foreign-market entry undertaken by Western firms. The established literature suggests that Western firms consider collaboration with a local firm as an accelerator for learning about and adapting to local conditions. However, the substantial socioeconomic differences that may exist between home and host country can create paramount challenges for collaborations between Western firms and their local partners. Adding a third type of partner from a country with substantial socioeconomic overlap to both firms' home countries can help “bridge the socioeconomic gap” between Western and local firms. The bridge-economy partners can assist Western firms in learning how to collaborate with their new local partners.</p><p>This study offers initial empirical evidence for the relevance of such interorganizational partnership triads between Western, bridge-economy, and local firms by using the data of Western venture capital firms (VCs) and their entries into Mainland China between 1997 and 2008. Venture age, regional legal maturity, and accumulated local experience of Western VCs are identified as relevant contingency factors for the likelihood of adopting this type of triadic interorganizational partnership. Quantitative hypothesis tests are supplemented with anecdotal qualitative evidence.</p><p>Reported findings extend the emerging entrepreneurship literature that focuses on foreign-market entry and globalization. Our focus on triadic partnerships and the role of bridge-economy firms extends the previous research that has instead nearly exclusively focused on dyadic collaborations between Western firms and local partners. A triadic WBL partnership offers an alternative strategy to use when entering foreign markets that have substantially different cultural, economic, and institutional characteristics. Our findings further highlight that even though such triadic WBL partnerships make intuitive sense, successfully implementing such complex collaborations requires minimum levels of accumulated host-country experiences and can benefit from mature legal environments. For policymakers in emerging economies that are interested in supporting foreign investment, the creation of legal environments conducive to forming such triadic WBL collaborations introduces a promising policy option. Beyond these initial key insights, this study also provides guidance for systematic future research into this promising type of collaboration for foreign market entry.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51348,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Venturing","volume":"39 1","pages":"Article 106363"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Venturing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883902623000770","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study introduces the novel construct of bridge-economy partners, which can assist Western firms in learning how to collaborate with local partners when entering unfamiliar foreign countries that have substantially different socioeconomic characteristics. We offer initial empirical evidence regarding the relevance of establishing such interorganizational partnership triads among Western, bridge-economy, and local firms for the entries of Western venture capital firms (VCs) into Mainland China between 1997 and 2008. Venture age, regional legal maturity, and the Western VCs' accumulated local experience are identified as relevant contingency factors for the likelihood of adopting this type of collaboration, which involves partners from three different types of economies. We supplement our quantitative analyses with anecdotal qualitative evidence from interviews with VC executives and fund managers.

Executive summary

This study introduces the novel construct of bridge-economy partners and outlines their potentially beneficial roles in the context of foreign-market entry undertaken by Western firms. The established literature suggests that Western firms consider collaboration with a local firm as an accelerator for learning about and adapting to local conditions. However, the substantial socioeconomic differences that may exist between home and host country can create paramount challenges for collaborations between Western firms and their local partners. Adding a third type of partner from a country with substantial socioeconomic overlap to both firms' home countries can help “bridge the socioeconomic gap” between Western and local firms. The bridge-economy partners can assist Western firms in learning how to collaborate with their new local partners.

This study offers initial empirical evidence for the relevance of such interorganizational partnership triads between Western, bridge-economy, and local firms by using the data of Western venture capital firms (VCs) and their entries into Mainland China between 1997 and 2008. Venture age, regional legal maturity, and accumulated local experience of Western VCs are identified as relevant contingency factors for the likelihood of adopting this type of triadic interorganizational partnership. Quantitative hypothesis tests are supplemented with anecdotal qualitative evidence.

Reported findings extend the emerging entrepreneurship literature that focuses on foreign-market entry and globalization. Our focus on triadic partnerships and the role of bridge-economy firms extends the previous research that has instead nearly exclusively focused on dyadic collaborations between Western firms and local partners. A triadic WBL partnership offers an alternative strategy to use when entering foreign markets that have substantially different cultural, economic, and institutional characteristics. Our findings further highlight that even though such triadic WBL partnerships make intuitive sense, successfully implementing such complex collaborations requires minimum levels of accumulated host-country experiences and can benefit from mature legal environments. For policymakers in emerging economies that are interested in supporting foreign investment, the creation of legal environments conducive to forming such triadic WBL collaborations introduces a promising policy option. Beyond these initial key insights, this study also provides guidance for systematic future research into this promising type of collaboration for foreign market entry.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国外市场进入的组织间三位一体:中国大陆西方、桥梁经济和本土风投之间的伙伴关系
本研究引入了桥梁经济合作伙伴的新概念,它可以帮助西方企业在进入具有显著不同社会经济特征的陌生国家时学习如何与当地合作伙伴合作。我们提供了初步的经验证据,证明在1997年至2008年间,西方风险投资公司(vc)进入中国大陆时,在西方公司、桥梁经济公司和本地公司之间建立这种组织间合作伙伴关系的相关性。风险投资年龄、地区法律成熟度和西方风险投资公司在当地积累的经验被认为是采用这种合作的可能性的相关偶然因素,这种合作涉及来自三种不同类型经济体的合作伙伴。我们用采访风投高管和基金经理的轶事定性证据来补充定量分析。本研究介绍了桥梁经济伙伴的新结构,并概述了它们在西方公司进入国外市场的背景下潜在的有益作用。已有的文献表明,西方企业将与当地企业的合作视为学习和适应当地条件的加速器。然而,母国和东道国之间可能存在的巨大社会经济差异可能给西方公司与其当地合作伙伴之间的合作带来重大挑战。在两家公司的母国增加来自社会经济有重大重叠的国家的第三类合伙人,可以帮助“弥合西方公司和当地公司之间的社会经济差距”。桥梁经济合作伙伴可以帮助西方公司学习如何与新的当地合作伙伴合作。本研究通过使用1997年至2008年西方风险投资公司及其进入中国大陆的数据,为西方企业、桥梁经济企业和本土企业之间的这种组织间伙伴关系三位一体的相关性提供了初步的经验证据。风险年龄、地区法律成熟度和西方风险投资在当地积累的经验被认为是采用这种三方组织间伙伴关系的可能性的相关偶然因素。定量假设检验补充了轶事定性证据。报告的研究结果扩展了新兴的创业文献,重点关注外国市场进入和全球化。我们对三方合作伙伴关系和桥梁经济公司的作用的关注扩展了以前的研究,而不是几乎完全关注西方公司与当地合作伙伴之间的二元合作。三位一体的WBL伙伴关系为进入具有截然不同的文化、经济和制度特征的国外市场提供了另一种策略。我们的研究结果进一步强调,尽管这种三方WBL伙伴关系具有直观意义,但成功实施这种复杂的合作需要东道国积累的最低水平的经验,并可以从成熟的法律环境中受益。对于有兴趣支持外国投资的新兴经济体的政策制定者来说,创造有利于形成这种三方WBL合作的法律环境是一种有希望的政策选择。除了这些最初的关键见解之外,本研究还为系统地研究这种有前途的外国市场进入合作类型提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.70
自引率
6.90%
发文量
59
审稿时长
77 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Venturing: Entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurial Finance, Innovation and Regional Development serves as a scholarly platform for the exchange of valuable insights, theories, narratives, and interpretations related to entrepreneurship and its implications. With a focus on enriching the understanding of entrepreneurship in its various manifestations, the journal seeks to publish papers that (1) draw from the experiences of entrepreneurs, innovators, and their ecosystem; and (2) tackle issues relevant to scholars, educators, facilitators, and practitioners involved in entrepreneurship. Embracing diversity in approach, methodology, and disciplinary perspective, the journal encourages contributions that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in entrepreneurship and its associated domains.
期刊最新文献
Rethinking entrepreneurship in causally entangled crises: A poly-crisis perspective Amplifying angels: Evidence from the INVEST program False signaling by platform team members and post-campaign venture outcomes: Evidence from an equity crowdfunding platform Funding-source-induced bias: How social ties influence entrepreneurs' anticipated guilt and risk-taking preferences Effect of venture capital investment horizon on new product development: Evidence from the medical device sector
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1