Health outcome predictive modelling in intensive care units

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Operations Research for Health Care Pub Date : 2023-10-04 DOI:10.1016/j.orhc.2023.100409
Chengqian Xian , Camila P.E. de Souza , Felipe F. Rodrigues
{"title":"Health outcome predictive modelling in intensive care units","authors":"Chengqian Xian ,&nbsp;Camila P.E. de Souza ,&nbsp;Felipe F. Rodrigues","doi":"10.1016/j.orhc.2023.100409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The literature in Intensive Care Units (ICUs) data analysis focuses on predictions of length-of-stay (LOS) and mortality based on patient acuity scores such as Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), to name a few. Unlike ICUs in other areas around the world, ICUs in Ontario, Canada, collect two primary intensive care scoring scales, a therapeutic acuity score called the “Multiple Organs Dysfunctional Score” (MODS) and a nursing workload score called the “Nine Equivalents Nursing Manpower Use Score” (NEMS). The dataset analyzed in this study contains patients’ NEMS and MODS scores measured upon patient admission into the ICU and other characteristics commonly found in the literature. Data were collected between January 1st, 2015 and May 31st, 2021, at two teaching hospital ICUs in Ontario, Canada. In this work, we developed logistic regression, random forests (RF) and neural networks (NN) models for mortality (discharged or deceased) and LOS (short or long stay) predictions. Considering the effect of mortality outcome on LOS, we also combined mortality and LOS to create a new categorical health outcome called LMClass (short stay &amp; discharged, short stay &amp; deceased, or long stay without specifying mortality outcomes), and then applied multinomial regression, RF and NN for its prediction. Among the models evaluated, logistic regression for mortality prediction results in the highest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.795 and also for LMClass prediction the highest accuracy of 0.630. In contrast, in LOS prediction, RF outperforms the other methods with the highest AUC of 0.689. This study also demonstrates that MODS and NEMS, as well as their components measured upon patient arrival, significantly contribute to health outcome prediction in ICUs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46320,"journal":{"name":"Operations Research for Health Care","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article 100409"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operations Research for Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211692323000322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The literature in Intensive Care Units (ICUs) data analysis focuses on predictions of length-of-stay (LOS) and mortality based on patient acuity scores such as Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), to name a few. Unlike ICUs in other areas around the world, ICUs in Ontario, Canada, collect two primary intensive care scoring scales, a therapeutic acuity score called the “Multiple Organs Dysfunctional Score” (MODS) and a nursing workload score called the “Nine Equivalents Nursing Manpower Use Score” (NEMS). The dataset analyzed in this study contains patients’ NEMS and MODS scores measured upon patient admission into the ICU and other characteristics commonly found in the literature. Data were collected between January 1st, 2015 and May 31st, 2021, at two teaching hospital ICUs in Ontario, Canada. In this work, we developed logistic regression, random forests (RF) and neural networks (NN) models for mortality (discharged or deceased) and LOS (short or long stay) predictions. Considering the effect of mortality outcome on LOS, we also combined mortality and LOS to create a new categorical health outcome called LMClass (short stay & discharged, short stay & deceased, or long stay without specifying mortality outcomes), and then applied multinomial regression, RF and NN for its prediction. Among the models evaluated, logistic regression for mortality prediction results in the highest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.795 and also for LMClass prediction the highest accuracy of 0.630. In contrast, in LOS prediction, RF outperforms the other methods with the highest AUC of 0.689. This study also demonstrates that MODS and NEMS, as well as their components measured upon patient arrival, significantly contribute to health outcome prediction in ICUs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重症监护病房的健康结局预测模型
重症监护病房(icu)数据分析的文献侧重于基于患者急性生理和慢性健康评估(APACHE)、顺序器官衰竭评估(SOFA)等患者视力评分来预测住院时间(LOS)和死亡率。与世界其他地区的icu不同,加拿大安大略省的icu收集两种主要的重症监护评分量表,一种是称为“多器官功能障碍评分”(MODS)的治疗灵敏度评分,另一种是称为“九等量护理人力使用评分”(NEMS)的护理工作量评分。本研究分析的数据集包含患者入ICU时的NEMS和MODS评分以及文献中常见的其他特征。数据于2015年1月1日至2021年5月31日在加拿大安大略省的两家教学医院icu收集。在这项工作中,我们开发了逻辑回归、随机森林(RF)和神经网络(NN)模型,用于死亡率(出院或死亡)和LOS(短期或长期住院)预测。考虑到死亡率结局对LOS的影响,我们还将死亡率和LOS结合起来创建了一个新的分类健康结局,称为LMClass(短期停留&出院,短暂停留;死亡,或长期停留,但未指定死亡结果),然后应用多项回归,RF和NN进行预测。在评估的模型中,logistic回归预测死亡率的曲线下面积(AUC)最高,为0.795,LMClass预测准确率最高,为0.630。相比之下,在LOS预测中,RF优于其他方法,AUC最高,为0.689。本研究还表明,MODS和NEMS及其在患者到达时测量的成分对icu的健康结局预测有重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Operations Research for Health Care
Operations Research for Health Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
69 days
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Preference-based allocation of patients to nursing homes Balancing continuity of care and home care schedule costs using blueprint routes Outpatient appointment systems: A new heuristic with patient classification A modeling framework for evaluating proactive and reactive nurse rostering strategies — A case study from a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1