Diagnosis and management of tandem occlusion in acute ischemic stroke

IF 1.8 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING European Journal of Radiology Open Pub Date : 2023-08-14 DOI:10.1016/j.ejro.2023.100513
Antonio Di Donna , Gianluca Muto , Flavio Giordano , Massimo Muto , Gianluigi Guarnieri , Giovanna Servillo , Antonio De Mase , Emanuele Spina , Giuseppe Leone
{"title":"Diagnosis and management of tandem occlusion in acute ischemic stroke","authors":"Antonio Di Donna ,&nbsp;Gianluca Muto ,&nbsp;Flavio Giordano ,&nbsp;Massimo Muto ,&nbsp;Gianluigi Guarnieri ,&nbsp;Giovanna Servillo ,&nbsp;Antonio De Mase ,&nbsp;Emanuele Spina ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Leone","doi":"10.1016/j.ejro.2023.100513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Approximately 20–30% of patients with acute ischemic stroke, caused by large intracranial vessel occlusion, have a tandem lesion, defined as simultaneous presence of high-grade stenosis or occlusion of the cervical internal carotid artery and thromboembolic occlusion of the intracranial terminal internal carotid artery or its branches, usually the middle cerebral artery. Patients with tandem lesions have usually worse outcomes than patients with single intracranial occlusions, and intravenous thrombolysis is less effective in these patients. Although endovascular thrombectomy is currently a cornerstone therapy in the management of acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion, the optimal management of extracranial carotid lesions in tandem occlusion remains controversial. Acute placement of a stent in the cervical carotid artery lesion is the most used therapeutic strategy compared with stented balloon angioplasty and thrombectomy alone without carotid artery revascularization; however, treatment strategies in these patients are often more complex than with single occlusion, so treatment decisions can change based on clinical and technical considerations. The aim of this review is to analyze the results of different studies and trials, investigating the periprocedural neurointerventional management of patients with tandem lesions and the safety, efficacy of the different technical strategies available as well as their impact on the clinical outcome in these patients, to strengthen current recommendations and thus optimize patient care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38076,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352047723000394","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Approximately 20–30% of patients with acute ischemic stroke, caused by large intracranial vessel occlusion, have a tandem lesion, defined as simultaneous presence of high-grade stenosis or occlusion of the cervical internal carotid artery and thromboembolic occlusion of the intracranial terminal internal carotid artery or its branches, usually the middle cerebral artery. Patients with tandem lesions have usually worse outcomes than patients with single intracranial occlusions, and intravenous thrombolysis is less effective in these patients. Although endovascular thrombectomy is currently a cornerstone therapy in the management of acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion, the optimal management of extracranial carotid lesions in tandem occlusion remains controversial. Acute placement of a stent in the cervical carotid artery lesion is the most used therapeutic strategy compared with stented balloon angioplasty and thrombectomy alone without carotid artery revascularization; however, treatment strategies in these patients are often more complex than with single occlusion, so treatment decisions can change based on clinical and technical considerations. The aim of this review is to analyze the results of different studies and trials, investigating the periprocedural neurointerventional management of patients with tandem lesions and the safety, efficacy of the different technical strategies available as well as their impact on the clinical outcome in these patients, to strengthen current recommendations and thus optimize patient care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性缺血性脑卒中串联闭塞的诊断与治疗
约20-30%由颅内大血管闭塞引起的急性缺血性卒中患者出现串联病变,定义为同时存在颈内动脉高度狭窄或闭塞,并同时存在颅内颈内动脉末端或其分支(通常是大脑中动脉)血栓栓塞性闭塞。串联病变患者的预后通常比单一颅内闭塞患者差,静脉溶栓对这些患者的效果较差。尽管血管内取栓术目前是治疗大血管闭塞引起的急性缺血性卒中的基础疗法,但串联闭塞时颅外颈动脉病变的最佳治疗仍存在争议。与单纯球囊血管成形术和取栓术相比,在颈动脉病变处急性置入支架是最常用的治疗策略;然而,这些患者的治疗策略往往比单一闭塞更复杂,因此治疗决策可以根据临床和技术考虑而改变。本综述的目的是分析不同研究和试验的结果,探讨继发性病变患者的围手术期神经介入治疗和不同技术策略的安全性、有效性及其对这些患者临床结果的影响,以加强目前的建议,从而优化患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Radiology Open
European Journal of Radiology Open Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
51 days
期刊最新文献
Deep learning model for diagnosis of thyroid nodules with size less than 1 cm: A multicenter, retrospective study MRI-based radiomics machine learning model to differentiate non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma from benign renal tumors Post-deployment performance of a deep learning algorithm for normal and abnormal chest X-ray classification: A study at visa screening centers in the United Arab Emirates Study on the classification of benign and malignant breast lesions using a multi-sequence breast MRI fusion radiomics and deep learning model True cost estimation of common imaging procedures for cost-effectiveness analysis - insights from a Singapore hospital emergency department
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1