A nontrivial interplay between triadic closure, preferential, and anti-preferential attachment: New insights from online data

Q1 Social Sciences Online Social Networks and Media Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.osnem.2023.100248
Ivan V. Kozitsin , Alexander V. Gubanov , Eduard R. Sayfulin , Vyacheslav L. Goiko
{"title":"A nontrivial interplay between triadic closure, preferential, and anti-preferential attachment: New insights from online data","authors":"Ivan V. Kozitsin ,&nbsp;Alexander V. Gubanov ,&nbsp;Eduard R. Sayfulin ,&nbsp;Vyacheslav L. Goiko","doi":"10.1016/j.osnem.2023.100248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper presents an analysis of a temporal network that describes the social connections of a large-scale (∼30,000) sample of online social network<span> users, inhabitants of a fixed city. We tested how the main network formation determinants—transitivity, preferential attachment, and social selection—contribute to network evolution. We obtained that tie appearing and tie removing events are governed by different combinations of mechanisms: whereas the structure of the network is responsible for the formation of new ties, nodal nonstructural characteristics “decide” whether a tie will continue to exist. Next, our findings show that only one network formation mechanism, gender selectivity, has a significant impact on both tie appearing and tie removing processes. What is interesting, the effect of gender selectivity is most notable for low-degree vertices. Besides this, our analysis revealed that opinion selectivity appears to be a noticeable (but not very important) factor only in the case of tie removing, whereas its contribution to tie appearing is elusive. Our findings suggest that nodes’ activity is a crucial factor of network evolution—the majority of tie removing events can be explained by the age-based activity mechanism. Finally, we report that transitivity and preferential attachment do govern network evolution. However, there are two important details: (i) their zone of influence is restricted primarily by tie appearing and (ii) the preferential attachment mechanism is replaced by the anti-preferential attachment rule if the number of common peers is greater than zero.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":52228,"journal":{"name":"Online Social Networks and Media","volume":"34 ","pages":"Article 100248"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online Social Networks and Media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468696423000071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents an analysis of a temporal network that describes the social connections of a large-scale (∼30,000) sample of online social network users, inhabitants of a fixed city. We tested how the main network formation determinants—transitivity, preferential attachment, and social selection—contribute to network evolution. We obtained that tie appearing and tie removing events are governed by different combinations of mechanisms: whereas the structure of the network is responsible for the formation of new ties, nodal nonstructural characteristics “decide” whether a tie will continue to exist. Next, our findings show that only one network formation mechanism, gender selectivity, has a significant impact on both tie appearing and tie removing processes. What is interesting, the effect of gender selectivity is most notable for low-degree vertices. Besides this, our analysis revealed that opinion selectivity appears to be a noticeable (but not very important) factor only in the case of tie removing, whereas its contribution to tie appearing is elusive. Our findings suggest that nodes’ activity is a crucial factor of network evolution—the majority of tie removing events can be explained by the age-based activity mechanism. Finally, we report that transitivity and preferential attachment do govern network evolution. However, there are two important details: (i) their zone of influence is restricted primarily by tie appearing and (ii) the preferential attachment mechanism is replaced by the anti-preferential attachment rule if the number of common peers is greater than zero.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三合一闭合、优先和反优先依恋之间的重要相互作用:来自在线数据的新见解
本文对一个时间网络进行了分析,该网络描述了大规模(~30000)在线社交网络用户样本的社会联系,这些用户是固定城市的居民。我们测试了网络形成的主要决定因素——传递性、偏好依恋和社会选择——对网络进化的贡献。我们得出,平局出现和平局消除事件由不同的机制组合决定:尽管网络的结构负责新平局的形成,但节点的非结构特征“决定”平局是否会继续存在。接下来,我们的研究结果表明,只有一种网络形成机制,即性别选择性,对领带的出现和去除过程都有显著影响。有趣的是,性别选择性的影响在低阶顶点中最为显著。除此之外,我们的分析表明,只有在消除平局的情况下,意见选择性似乎是一个显著的(但不是很重要)因素,而它对平局出现的贡献是难以捉摸的。我们的研究结果表明,节点的活动是网络进化的一个关键因素——大多数消除平局的事件可以用基于年龄的活动机制来解释。最后,我们报告了传递性和优先依恋确实支配着网络进化。然而,有两个重要的细节:(i)它们的影响区域主要受到平局出现的限制;(ii)如果公共对等体的数量大于零,则优先依恋机制被反优先依恋规则所取代。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Online Social Networks and Media
Online Social Networks and Media Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
44 days
期刊最新文献
How does user-generated content on Social Media affect stock predictions? A case study on GameStop Measuring centralization of online platforms through size and interconnection of communities Crowdsourcing the Mitigation of disinformation and misinformation: The case of spontaneous community-based moderation on Reddit GASCOM: Graph-based Attentive Semantic Context Modeling for Online Conversation Understanding The influence of coordinated behavior on toxicity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1