All in favour? Indian business interests and the India-EU FTA

IF 1.6 3区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Asia Europe Journal Pub Date : 2023-06-05 DOI:10.1007/s10308-023-00672-y
Kari Irwin Otteburn
{"title":"All in favour? Indian business interests and the India-EU FTA","authors":"Kari Irwin Otteburn","doi":"10.1007/s10308-023-00672-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Negotiations between the European Union (EU) and India regarding a free trade agreement (FTA) have been hindered by numerous difficulties and disagreements since they began in 2007. A few studies have pointed at various key points of contention, including inter alia tariffs on sensitive products, intellectual property rights, trade in services, and chapters on non-trade issues. Despite a long-standing body of research into the ways in which interest groups, particularly business interests groups, influence economic policymaking and the outcomes of trade negotiations, the preferences of interest groups — especially on the Indian side — have been largely overlooked in the context of the FTA negotiations. This is reflective of a general lack of research on preferences toward trade agreements of interests groups in the Global South. In this paper, I analyse the preferences toward the agreement of India’s most influential chamber of commerce: the Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FICCI). The analysis shows that, since the start of negotiations, FICCI’s perception of the FTA has been deeply ambivalent and the policy preferences of the chamber are not likely to be met by an FTA between the EU and India. Additionally, the chamber’s preferences toward certain chapters of the agreement, particularly toward the key issues, may limit Indian negotiators’ ability to compromise, with several potential implications for the final agreement.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45680,"journal":{"name":"Asia Europe Journal","volume":"21 3","pages":"311 - 329"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10308-023-00672-y.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Europe Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10308-023-00672-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Negotiations between the European Union (EU) and India regarding a free trade agreement (FTA) have been hindered by numerous difficulties and disagreements since they began in 2007. A few studies have pointed at various key points of contention, including inter alia tariffs on sensitive products, intellectual property rights, trade in services, and chapters on non-trade issues. Despite a long-standing body of research into the ways in which interest groups, particularly business interests groups, influence economic policymaking and the outcomes of trade negotiations, the preferences of interest groups — especially on the Indian side — have been largely overlooked in the context of the FTA negotiations. This is reflective of a general lack of research on preferences toward trade agreements of interests groups in the Global South. In this paper, I analyse the preferences toward the agreement of India’s most influential chamber of commerce: the Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FICCI). The analysis shows that, since the start of negotiations, FICCI’s perception of the FTA has been deeply ambivalent and the policy preferences of the chamber are not likely to be met by an FTA between the EU and India. Additionally, the chamber’s preferences toward certain chapters of the agreement, particularly toward the key issues, may limit Indian negotiators’ ability to compromise, with several potential implications for the final agreement.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
都赞成吗?印度的商业利益和印度-欧盟自由贸易协定
欧盟(EU)和印度之间的自由贸易协定(FTA)谈判自2007年开始以来一直受到许多困难和分歧的阻碍。一些研究指出了各种关键的争论点,包括敏感产品的关税、知识产权、服务贸易和关于非贸易问题的章节。尽管长期以来一直在研究利益集团,特别是商业利益集团如何影响经济决策和贸易谈判的结果,但在自由贸易协定谈判的背景下,利益集团的偏好,特别是印度方面的偏好,在很大程度上被忽视了。这反映出普遍缺乏对全球南方利益集团的贸易协定偏好的研究。在本文中,我分析了印度最具影响力的商会——印度工商联合会(FICCI)对协议的偏好。分析表明,自谈判开始以来,印度工商总商会对自由贸易协定的看法一直非常矛盾,欧盟和印度之间的自由贸易协定不太可能满足商会的政策偏好。此外,美国商会对协议某些章节的偏好,尤其是对关键问题的偏好,可能会限制印度谈判代表的妥协能力,从而对最终协议产生一些潜在影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Asia Europe Journal
Asia Europe Journal INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: The Asia-Europe Journal is a quarterly journal dedicated to publishing quality academic papers and policy discussions on common challenges facing Asia and Europe that help to shape narratives on the common futures - including both risks and opportunities - of Asia and Europe. The Journal welcomes academically and intellectually rigorous research papers as well as topical policy briefs and thought pieces on issues of bi-regional interest, including management and political economy, innovation, security studies, regional and global governance, as well as on relevant socio-cultural developments and historical events. Officially cited as: Asia Eur J
期刊最新文献
Geo-economic and geopolitical developments in EU-asia security relations Informing macrologistics connectivity in emerging economies through a triangulated research approach: the case of Uzbekistan Correction: The regime complex for digital trade in Asia and China’s engagement Paradiplomacy and international conflict: disengagement from China by Swedish local governments International law: from fragmentation to integration? an analysis of the relationship between international trade law and international labor law in multilateral and regional trade law frameworks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1