{"title":"The “Makpo” Recade: Prestigious Object of the Kings of Dahomey and its Sculpture Materials","authors":"D. Rakiba Boulanki Bello, Xiaodong Zhu","doi":"10.1007/s11759-020-09412-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The “Makpo” recade in Fon language (language and an ethnic group from South Benin, formerly Dahomey) means message stick or fury’s stick which is a royal specter. In the kingdom of Dahomey, royal power is represented by 7 badges. The “Makpo” recade is one of its badges. It is an object specific to the kings of Dahomey who wore them on the left shoulder. Their functions are numerous. It derives from the hoe and undergoes an evolution over time. The objective of the study is to identify the materials and the wood species used for the manufacture of the recades in order to understand the choice of sculptors and the cultural importance that the materials used could have. The oral accounts of the resource persons (dignitaries of the royal court and holders of the history of Dahomey), the visit to the museum ‘Le petit Musée de la Récade’ (Benin), and the documentation made it possible to collect the data allowing analysis of the results. The data collected were compared with the timber identification data described and codified by Tropical Timber Atlas and meeting NF EN standards. Out of 11 recades analyzed, the materials determined are wood, metals and ivory. Wood is the most used material which gives a sacred cultural side to the recades because of the specific choice of species.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44740,"journal":{"name":"Archaeologies-Journal of the World Archaeological Congress","volume":"16 3","pages":"505 - 519"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11759-020-09412-9","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeologies-Journal of the World Archaeological Congress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11759-020-09412-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The “Makpo” recade in Fon language (language and an ethnic group from South Benin, formerly Dahomey) means message stick or fury’s stick which is a royal specter. In the kingdom of Dahomey, royal power is represented by 7 badges. The “Makpo” recade is one of its badges. It is an object specific to the kings of Dahomey who wore them on the left shoulder. Their functions are numerous. It derives from the hoe and undergoes an evolution over time. The objective of the study is to identify the materials and the wood species used for the manufacture of the recades in order to understand the choice of sculptors and the cultural importance that the materials used could have. The oral accounts of the resource persons (dignitaries of the royal court and holders of the history of Dahomey), the visit to the museum ‘Le petit Musée de la Récade’ (Benin), and the documentation made it possible to collect the data allowing analysis of the results. The data collected were compared with the timber identification data described and codified by Tropical Timber Atlas and meeting NF EN standards. Out of 11 recades analyzed, the materials determined are wood, metals and ivory. Wood is the most used material which gives a sacred cultural side to the recades because of the specific choice of species.
丰语中的“Makpo”recade(来自南贝宁的一种语言和民族,前达荷美语)的意思是信息棒或愤怒的棍子,这是一种皇家幽灵。在达荷美王国,王室权力由7个徽章代表。“Makpo”徽章就是其中之一。这是达荷美国王特有的物品,他们把它们戴在左肩上。它们的作用是多方面的。它源于锄头,并随着时间的推移而发生演变。本研究的目的是确定用于制作recades的材料和木材种类,以了解雕塑家的选择以及所用材料可能具有的文化重要性。专家(王室要员和达荷美历史持有者)的口头陈述、对“Le petit Musée de la Récade”博物馆(贝宁)的参观以及文件使收集数据以便分析结果成为可能。将收集到的数据与热带木材地图集描述和编码的木材识别数据进行比较,并符合NF EN标准。在分析的11种recades中,确定的材料是木材、金属和象牙。木材是最常用的材料,由于物种的特殊选择,它给recades带来了神圣的文化一面。
期刊介绍:
Archaeologies: Journal of the World Archaeological Congress offers a venue for debates and topical issues, through peer-reviewed articles, reports and reviews. It emphasizes contributions that seek to recenter (or decenter) archaeology, and that challenge local and global power geometries.
Areas of interest include ethics and archaeology; public archaeology; legacies of colonialism and nationalism within the discipline; the interplay of local and global archaeological traditions; theory and archaeology; the discipline’s involvement in projects of memory, identity, and restitution; and rights and ethics relating to cultural property, issues of acquisition, custodianship, conservation, and display.
Recognizing the importance of non-Western epistemologies and intellectual traditions, the journal publishes some material in nonstandard format, including dialogues; annotated photographic essays; transcripts of public events; and statements from elders, custodians, descent groups and individuals.