Soil organic carbon stock change following perennialization: a meta-analysis

IF 6.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY Agronomy for Sustainable Development Pub Date : 2023-08-23 DOI:10.1007/s13593-023-00912-w
Imran Ahammad Siddique, Diego Grados, Ji Chen, Poul Erik Lærke, Uffe Jørgensen
{"title":"Soil organic carbon stock change following perennialization: a meta-analysis","authors":"Imran Ahammad Siddique,&nbsp;Diego Grados,&nbsp;Ji Chen,&nbsp;Poul Erik Lærke,&nbsp;Uffe Jørgensen","doi":"10.1007/s13593-023-00912-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Perennial crops replacing annual crops are drawing global attention because they harbor potential for sustainable biomass production and climate change mitigation through soil carbon sequestration. At present, it remains unclear how long perennial crops can sequester carbon in the soil and how soil carbon stock dynamics are influenced by climate, soil, and plant properties across the globe. This study presents a meta-analysis synthesizing 51 publications (351 observations at 77 sites) distributed over different pedo-climatic conditions to scrutinize the effect of perennialization on organic carbon accumulation in soil compared with two annual benchmark systems (i.e., monoculture and crop rotation). Results showed that perennial crops significantly increased soil organic carbon stock by 16.6% and 23.1% at 0–30 cm depth compared with monoculture and crop rotation, respectively. Shortly after establishment (&lt; 5 years), perennial crops revealed a negative impact on soil organic carbon stock; however, long duration (&gt; 10 years) of perennialization had a significant positive effect on soil organic carbon stock by 30% and 36.4% at 0–30 cm depth compared with monoculture and crop rotation, respectively. Compared with both annual systems, perennial crops significantly increased soil organic carbon stock regardless of their functional photosynthetic types (C<sub>3</sub>, C<sub>4</sub>, or C<sub>3</sub>-C<sub>4</sub> intermediates) and vegetation type (woody or herbaceous). Among other factors, pH had a significant impact on soil organic carbon; however, the effect of soil textures showed no significant impact, possibly due to a lack of observations from each textural class and mixed pedoclimatic effects. Results also showed that time effect of perennialization revealed a sigmoidal increase of soil organic carbon stock until about 20 years; thereafter, the soil carbon stocks advanced towards a steady-state level. In conclusion, perennial crops increased soil organic carbon stock compared with annual systems; however, the time since conversion from annual to perennial system decisively impacted soil organic carbon stock changes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7721,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","volume":"43 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13593-023-00912-w.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13593-023-00912-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Perennial crops replacing annual crops are drawing global attention because they harbor potential for sustainable biomass production and climate change mitigation through soil carbon sequestration. At present, it remains unclear how long perennial crops can sequester carbon in the soil and how soil carbon stock dynamics are influenced by climate, soil, and plant properties across the globe. This study presents a meta-analysis synthesizing 51 publications (351 observations at 77 sites) distributed over different pedo-climatic conditions to scrutinize the effect of perennialization on organic carbon accumulation in soil compared with two annual benchmark systems (i.e., monoculture and crop rotation). Results showed that perennial crops significantly increased soil organic carbon stock by 16.6% and 23.1% at 0–30 cm depth compared with monoculture and crop rotation, respectively. Shortly after establishment (< 5 years), perennial crops revealed a negative impact on soil organic carbon stock; however, long duration (> 10 years) of perennialization had a significant positive effect on soil organic carbon stock by 30% and 36.4% at 0–30 cm depth compared with monoculture and crop rotation, respectively. Compared with both annual systems, perennial crops significantly increased soil organic carbon stock regardless of their functional photosynthetic types (C3, C4, or C3-C4 intermediates) and vegetation type (woody or herbaceous). Among other factors, pH had a significant impact on soil organic carbon; however, the effect of soil textures showed no significant impact, possibly due to a lack of observations from each textural class and mixed pedoclimatic effects. Results also showed that time effect of perennialization revealed a sigmoidal increase of soil organic carbon stock until about 20 years; thereafter, the soil carbon stocks advanced towards a steady-state level. In conclusion, perennial crops increased soil organic carbon stock compared with annual systems; however, the time since conversion from annual to perennial system decisively impacted soil organic carbon stock changes.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多年生化后土壤有机碳储量变化的荟萃分析
多年生作物取代一年生作物正引起全球关注,因为它们具有通过土壤固碳实现可持续生物量生产和缓解气候变化的潜力。目前,尚不清楚多年生作物能在土壤中固碳多久,以及全球气候、土壤和植物特性如何影响土壤碳储量动态。这项研究提出了一项荟萃分析,综合了分布在不同土壤气候条件下的51篇出版物(77个地点的351个观测结果),与两个年度基准系统(即单一栽培和轮作)相比,仔细研究了多年生对土壤中有机碳积累的影响。结果表明,与单作和轮作相比,多年生作物在0–30厘米深度处的土壤有机碳储量分别显著增加了16.6%和23.1%。在建立后不久(<;5年),多年生作物对土壤有机碳储量产生了负面影响;然而,与单作和轮作相比,长期(>;10年)的多年生对0-30cm深度的土壤有机碳储量分别产生了30%和36.4%的显著正向影响。与这两个年度系统相比,多年生作物显著增加了土壤有机碳储量,无论其功能性光合类型(C3、C4或C3-C4中间体)和植被类型(木本或草本)如何。在其他因素中,pH对土壤有机碳有显著影响;然而,土壤质地的影响没有显示出显著的影响,这可能是由于缺乏对每个质地类别的观测和混合土壤气候影响。结果还表明,多年生化的时间效应表现为土壤有机碳储量呈S型增加,直到20年左右;此后,土壤碳储量向稳态水平发展。总之,与一年生系统相比,多年生作物增加了土壤有机碳储量;然而,从一年生系统向多年生系统转换以来的时间对土壤有机碳储量的变化产生了决定性的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agronomy for Sustainable Development
Agronomy for Sustainable Development 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
8.20%
发文量
108
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Agronomy for Sustainable Development (ASD) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal of international scope, dedicated to publishing original research articles, review articles, and meta-analyses aimed at improving sustainability in agricultural and food systems. The journal serves as a bridge between agronomy, cropping, and farming system research and various other disciplines including ecology, genetics, economics, and social sciences. ASD encourages studies in agroecology, participatory research, and interdisciplinary approaches, with a focus on systems thinking applied at different scales from field to global levels. Research articles published in ASD should present significant scientific advancements compared to existing knowledge, within an international context. Review articles should critically evaluate emerging topics, and opinion papers may also be submitted as reviews. Meta-analysis articles should provide clear contributions to resolving widely debated scientific questions.
期刊最新文献
Restored legume acts as a “nurse” to facilitate plant compensatory growth and biomass production in mown grasslands Introducing intermediate wheatgrass as a perennial grain crop into farming systems: insights into the decision-making process of pioneer farmers Enhancing ecosystem services through direct-seeded rice in middle Indo-Gangetic Plains: a comparative study of different rice establishment practices Transitions to crop residue burning have multiple antecedents in Eastern India Irrigated rice yield plateaus are caused by management factors in Argentina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1