Smallpox vaccination and the limits of governing through contagion in the Straits Settlements, 1868–1926

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 Q1 LAW Law & Policy Pub Date : 2023-06-02 DOI:10.1111/lapo.12221
Jack Jin Gary Lee, Lynette J. Chua
{"title":"Smallpox vaccination and the limits of governing through contagion in the Straits Settlements, 1868–1926","authors":"Jack Jin Gary Lee,&nbsp;Lynette J. Chua","doi":"10.1111/lapo.12221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Vaccination involves the encounter of nonhuman biological matter and human bodies, recalibrating our susceptibility to illness and death. This boundary-crossing act has been caught in conflicting webs of moral significance, including the normalizing frameworks of public health governance and its corresponding forms of resistance. Such tensions and dynamics were a feature of smallpox vaccination - the first modern, systematic state-driven project to build population immunity. Focusing on smallpox vaccination in the British-ruled Straits Settlements (Singapore, Penang, and Malacca) between 1868 and 1926, we examine the recurrent features of contentions over vaccination from the tentative beginnings of the 1868 Vaccination Ordinance to the systematic extension of vaccination in the 20th century. Engaging science and technology studies of nonhuman agency and social theories on security, we argue that such contentions demonstrate the limits of a power formation we call governing through contagion (GTC). GTC centralizes law and other technologies to normalize public health measures that combat contagious diseases, while <i>dys</i>connecting populations by its strategies of control. Our history of smallpox vaccination reveals: (i) GTC relies on the interconnectedness of human and nonhuman actors in protecting populations against viral threats; law is essential but does not necessarily drive vaccination or other strategies of control and (ii) resistance to GTC, in which law plays an integral role, reinforces inequalities and differentiated treatment, what we term endemic inter/dysconnectedness.</p>","PeriodicalId":47050,"journal":{"name":"Law & Policy","volume":"45 3","pages":"331-352"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lapo.12221","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vaccination involves the encounter of nonhuman biological matter and human bodies, recalibrating our susceptibility to illness and death. This boundary-crossing act has been caught in conflicting webs of moral significance, including the normalizing frameworks of public health governance and its corresponding forms of resistance. Such tensions and dynamics were a feature of smallpox vaccination - the first modern, systematic state-driven project to build population immunity. Focusing on smallpox vaccination in the British-ruled Straits Settlements (Singapore, Penang, and Malacca) between 1868 and 1926, we examine the recurrent features of contentions over vaccination from the tentative beginnings of the 1868 Vaccination Ordinance to the systematic extension of vaccination in the 20th century. Engaging science and technology studies of nonhuman agency and social theories on security, we argue that such contentions demonstrate the limits of a power formation we call governing through contagion (GTC). GTC centralizes law and other technologies to normalize public health measures that combat contagious diseases, while dysconnecting populations by its strategies of control. Our history of smallpox vaccination reveals: (i) GTC relies on the interconnectedness of human and nonhuman actors in protecting populations against viral threats; law is essential but does not necessarily drive vaccination or other strategies of control and (ii) resistance to GTC, in which law plays an integral role, reinforces inequalities and differentiated treatment, what we term endemic inter/dysconnectedness.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1868-1926年海峡定居点的天花疫苗接种和传染控制限制
疫苗接种涉及非人类生物物质和人体的相遇,重新校准我们对疾病和死亡的易感性。这一跨越边界的行为陷入了道德意义的相互冲突的网络中,包括公共卫生治理的正常化框架及其相应的抵抗形式。这种紧张和动态是天花疫苗接种的一个特点,这是第一个现代的、系统的、由国家驱动的建立人群免疫力的项目。以1868年至1926年间英国统治的海峡定居点(新加坡、槟城和马六甲)的天花疫苗接种为重点,我们考察了从1868年《疫苗接种条例》的初步开始到20世纪疫苗接种的系统扩展,关于疫苗接种的争论的反复特征。通过对非人类能动性和安全社会理论的科学技术研究,我们认为,这些争论表明了我们所称的通过传染进行治理(GTC)的权力形成的局限性。GTC将法律和其他技术集中起来,使对抗传染病的公共卫生措施正常化,同时通过其控制策略使人群脱节。我们的天花疫苗接种史表明:(i)GTC在保护人群免受病毒威胁方面依赖于人类和非人类行为者的相互联系;法律是必不可少的,但不一定推动疫苗接种或其他控制策略,以及(ii)对GTC的抵抗,在GTC中,法律发挥着不可或缺的作用,强化了不平等和差异化治疗,我们称之为地方性的相互联系/不连接。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
15.40%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: International and interdisciplinary in scope, Law & Policy embraces varied research methodologies that interrogate law, governance, and public policy worldwide. Law & Policy makes a vital contribution to the current dialogue on contemporary policy by publishing innovative, peer-reviewed articles on such critical topics as • government and self-regulation • health • environment • family • gender • taxation and finance • legal decision-making • criminal justice • human rights
期刊最新文献
Prosecutor-Led Bail Reform: An Observational Case Study in Philadelphia Issue Information Implementing Equality: State (Non)compliance With Judicial Revisions to Public Policy on Gay Rights “Why Would I Go Back There?”: Medical Mistrust and the Problem of Maternal Mortality An opportunity for abolition: McCleskey, innocence, and the modern death penalty decline
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1