Suspicious places make people suspicious: Officers’ perceptions of place-based conditions in racialized drug enforcement

IF 3.5 1区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Criminology & Public Policy Pub Date : 2022-11-02 DOI:10.1111/1745-9133.12606
Shytierra Gaston, Rod K. Brunson, David O. Ayeni
{"title":"Suspicious places make people suspicious: Officers’ perceptions of place-based conditions in racialized drug enforcement","authors":"Shytierra Gaston,&nbsp;Rod K. Brunson,&nbsp;David O. Ayeni","doi":"10.1111/1745-9133.12606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Research Summary</h3>\n \n <p>Place-based conditions are well-established predictors of police behavior, but the literature lacks nuanced examinations of how place-based factors influence officer decision making, especially by citizen race/ethnicity and from officers’ perspectives. We investigate officers’ accounts regarding how they weigh place-based factors into their arrest decisions of Black, Hispanic, and White drug suspects in Newark, New Jersey from 2011 to 2016. Our analysis of 438 filed drug arrest reports revealed that most arrestees, especially Black Americans, became susceptible to heightened police scrutiny because of their presence in stigmatized, criminalized areas. Although place-based stigma and individualized prohibited behavior coalesced to guide police contacts with Hispanic and White residents, officers made contacts with Black Americans based on a lower legal basis, often irrespective of their individualized behavior in stigmatized places.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Policy Implications</h3>\n \n <p>Officers’ differential, racialized reliance on place-based conditions supports the need for effective, evidence-based, community-centered social services that reduce crime, overreliance on police, and opportunities for discriminatory policing.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47902,"journal":{"name":"Criminology & Public Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Criminology & Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1745-9133.12606","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Research Summary

Place-based conditions are well-established predictors of police behavior, but the literature lacks nuanced examinations of how place-based factors influence officer decision making, especially by citizen race/ethnicity and from officers’ perspectives. We investigate officers’ accounts regarding how they weigh place-based factors into their arrest decisions of Black, Hispanic, and White drug suspects in Newark, New Jersey from 2011 to 2016. Our analysis of 438 filed drug arrest reports revealed that most arrestees, especially Black Americans, became susceptible to heightened police scrutiny because of their presence in stigmatized, criminalized areas. Although place-based stigma and individualized prohibited behavior coalesced to guide police contacts with Hispanic and White residents, officers made contacts with Black Americans based on a lower legal basis, often irrespective of their individualized behavior in stigmatized places.

Policy Implications

Officers’ differential, racialized reliance on place-based conditions supports the need for effective, evidence-based, community-centered social services that reduce crime, overreliance on police, and opportunities for discriminatory policing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可疑的地方让人怀疑:警察对种族化缉毒中基于地点的条件的看法
研究摘要基于地点的条件是警察行为的公认预测因素,但文献缺乏对基于地点的因素如何影响警察决策的细致研究,尤其是通过公民种族/民族和警察的角度。我们调查了2011年至2016年在新泽西州纽瓦克市,警察如何在逮捕黑人、西班牙裔和白人毒品嫌疑人的决定中权衡基于地点的因素。我们对438份已提交的毒品逮捕报告的分析显示,大多数被捕者,尤其是美国黑人,由于他们存在于污名化、犯罪化的地区,因此容易受到警方的高度审查。尽管基于地方的污名化和个性化的禁止行为结合在一起,引导警察与西班牙裔和白人居民接触,但警察与美国黑人的接触是基于较低的法律基础,通常与他们在污名化地方的个性化行为无关。政策影响官员对基于地点的条件的差异化、种族化依赖支持了对有效、循证、以社区为中心的社会服务的需求,以减少犯罪、对警察的过度依赖和歧视性警务的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Criminology & Public Policy
Criminology & Public Policy CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
6.50%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Criminology & Public Policy is interdisciplinary in nature, devoted to policy discussions of criminology research findings. Focusing on the study of criminal justice policy and practice, the central objective of the journal is to strengthen the role of research findings in the formulation of crime and justice policy by publishing empirically based, policy focused articles.
期刊最新文献
Short‐term evaluation of Cure Violence St. Louis: Challenges, triumphs, and lessons learned Situational crime prevention as a harm mitigation policy for active shooter incidents Locked up and awaiting trial: Testing the criminogenic and punitive effects of spending a week or more in pretrial detention Lessons learned from Dread darknet communities: How and why are fraudsters targeting the elderly to be victims or accomplices? Direct incentives may increase employment of people with criminal records
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1