“Kill the chicken to scare the monkey”: Heavy penalties, excessive COVID-19 control mechanisms, and legal consciousness in China

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 Q1 LAW Law & Policy Pub Date : 2023-01-05 DOI:10.1111/lapo.12202
Qian Liu
{"title":"“Kill the chicken to scare the monkey”: Heavy penalties, excessive COVID-19 control mechanisms, and legal consciousness in China","authors":"Qian Liu","doi":"10.1111/lapo.12202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study analyses the legal consciousness of Chinese citizens during the COVID-19 pandemic when the authoritarian state invoked heavy penalties to deter noncompliance with its excessive COVID-19 restrictions. China used the approach of “killing the chicken to scare the monkey,” publicly punishing those who violated restrictions in order to deter noncompliance. This article explains why ordinary citizens supported this selective application of the law, as well as how the possibility of being the “chicken” contributed to their compliance (or noncompliance) with excessive COVID-19 restrictions. It suggests that the uncertainty and unpredictability of law in the authoritarian state bred fear, which then led to compliance, regardless of the lack of procedural fairness. People's dissatisfaction with the rules, however, led them to tolerate and even support the noncompliance of people they trusted.</p>","PeriodicalId":47050,"journal":{"name":"Law & Policy","volume":"45 3","pages":"292-310"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lapo.12202","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study analyses the legal consciousness of Chinese citizens during the COVID-19 pandemic when the authoritarian state invoked heavy penalties to deter noncompliance with its excessive COVID-19 restrictions. China used the approach of “killing the chicken to scare the monkey,” publicly punishing those who violated restrictions in order to deter noncompliance. This article explains why ordinary citizens supported this selective application of the law, as well as how the possibility of being the “chicken” contributed to their compliance (or noncompliance) with excessive COVID-19 restrictions. It suggests that the uncertainty and unpredictability of law in the authoritarian state bred fear, which then led to compliance, regardless of the lack of procedural fairness. People's dissatisfaction with the rules, however, led them to tolerate and even support the noncompliance of people they trusted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“杀鸡吓猴”:中国重罚、新冠肺炎控制机制过度、法律意识
本研究分析了新冠肺炎大流行期间中国公民的法律意识,当时威权国家援引重刑来阻止不遵守其过度的新冠肺炎限制。中国采取了“杀鸡吓猴”的做法,公开惩罚那些违反限制的人,以阻止违规行为。这篇文章解释了为什么普通公民支持这种选择性的法律适用,以及成为“鸡”的可能性如何促使他们遵守(或不遵守)过度的新冠肺炎限制。这表明,威权国家法律的不确定性和不可预测性滋生了恐惧,这导致了遵守,尽管缺乏程序公平性。然而,人们对规则的不满导致他们容忍甚至支持他们信任的人不遵守规则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
15.40%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: International and interdisciplinary in scope, Law & Policy embraces varied research methodologies that interrogate law, governance, and public policy worldwide. Law & Policy makes a vital contribution to the current dialogue on contemporary policy by publishing innovative, peer-reviewed articles on such critical topics as • government and self-regulation • health • environment • family • gender • taxation and finance • legal decision-making • criminal justice • human rights
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Does racial impact statement reform reduce Black–White disparities in imprisonment: Mixed methods evidence from Minnesota Stewards, defenders, progenitors, and collaborators: Courts in the age of democratic decline Judicial transformation in a competitive authoritarian regime: Evidence from the Turkish case Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1