Deaths and COVID-19: Talk, silence and alternative realities

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 Q1 LAW Law & Policy Pub Date : 2023-06-05 DOI:10.1111/lapo.12222
Joe Sim, Steve Tombs
{"title":"Deaths and COVID-19: Talk, silence and alternative realities","authors":"Joe Sim,&nbsp;Steve Tombs","doi":"10.1111/lapo.12222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article critically considers the UK Government's insidious attempts to control the narrative around COVID-19 deaths through using the interrelated strategies of “talk and ‘silence’ in order to socially construct a definitive ‘truth’” around the virus. The article traces how these strategies worked in practice and the shift which took place from numerous press briefings and Parliamentary debates to an ominous silence around the number of deaths, in particular. At the same time, as the article illustrates, the government's truth has not prevailed. Their twin strategy has been contested and resisted by grassroots organizations and radical lawyers who have demanded that Ministers should take responsibility for the tens of thousands of preventable deaths which have occurred. Rather than government talk and silence prevailing, it is the voices of the haunted relatives of the dead, demanding accountability, which are creating an alternative narrative.</p>","PeriodicalId":47050,"journal":{"name":"Law & Policy","volume":"45 3","pages":"373-391"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lapo.12222","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article critically considers the UK Government's insidious attempts to control the narrative around COVID-19 deaths through using the interrelated strategies of “talk and ‘silence’ in order to socially construct a definitive ‘truth’” around the virus. The article traces how these strategies worked in practice and the shift which took place from numerous press briefings and Parliamentary debates to an ominous silence around the number of deaths, in particular. At the same time, as the article illustrates, the government's truth has not prevailed. Their twin strategy has been contested and resisted by grassroots organizations and radical lawyers who have demanded that Ministers should take responsibility for the tens of thousands of preventable deaths which have occurred. Rather than government talk and silence prevailing, it is the voices of the haunted relatives of the dead, demanding accountability, which are creating an alternative narrative.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
死亡与新冠肺炎:对话、沉默与另类现实
本文批判性地考虑了英国政府通过使用“谈话和‘沉默’”的相互关联策略来控制围绕新冠肺炎死亡的叙事的阴险企图,以在社会上构建围绕病毒的明确“真相”。这篇文章追溯了这些策略在实践中是如何运作的,以及从多次新闻发布会和议会辩论到对死亡人数保持不祥沉默的转变。与此同时,正如文章所表明的那样,政府的真相并没有占上风。他们的双重策略受到了基层组织和激进律师的质疑和抵制,他们要求部长们对已经发生的数万起可预防的死亡事件负责。与其说政府的谈话和沉默盛行,不如说是闹鬼的死者亲属要求追究责任的声音,这创造了一种另类的叙事。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
15.40%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: International and interdisciplinary in scope, Law & Policy embraces varied research methodologies that interrogate law, governance, and public policy worldwide. Law & Policy makes a vital contribution to the current dialogue on contemporary policy by publishing innovative, peer-reviewed articles on such critical topics as • government and self-regulation • health • environment • family • gender • taxation and finance • legal decision-making • criminal justice • human rights
期刊最新文献
Prosecutor-Led Bail Reform: An Observational Case Study in Philadelphia Issue Information Implementing Equality: State (Non)compliance With Judicial Revisions to Public Policy on Gay Rights “Why Would I Go Back There?”: Medical Mistrust and the Problem of Maternal Mortality An opportunity for abolition: McCleskey, innocence, and the modern death penalty decline
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1