Multi-trait genomic predictions using GBLUP and Bayesian mixture prior model in beef cattle

Zezhao Wang, Haoran Ma, Hongwei Li, Lei Xu, Hongyan Li, Bo Zhu, El Hamidi Hay, Lingyang Xu, Junya Li
{"title":"Multi-trait genomic predictions using GBLUP and Bayesian mixture prior model in beef cattle","authors":"Zezhao Wang,&nbsp;Haoran Ma,&nbsp;Hongwei Li,&nbsp;Lei Xu,&nbsp;Hongyan Li,&nbsp;Bo Zhu,&nbsp;El Hamidi Hay,&nbsp;Lingyang Xu,&nbsp;Junya Li","doi":"10.1002/aro2.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Multiple trait genomic selection incorporating correlated traits can improve the predictive ability of low-heritability traits. In this study, we evaluated genomic prediction accuracy using multi-trait BayesCπ method (MT-BayesCπ), which allows for a broader range of mixture priors for important traits in beef cattle. We compared the prediction performance of MT-BayesCπ with single-trait genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ST-GBLUP), multi-trait GBLUP (MT-GBLUP), and single-trait BayeCπ (ST-BayesCπ) methods. We found that ribeye area (REA) and ribeye weight (REWT) showed high heritability, while slaughter weight (SWT) and carcass weight (CWT) displayed medium heritability, and slaughter rate (SR) and feedlot average daily gain (FDG) showed low heritability. Highly positive genetic correlations were observed between CWT and SWT (0.981) and SR and REWT (0.921). Notably, the MT-BayesCπ method showed superior predictive abilities compared to other models. Using MT-BayesCπ method, the accuracy increased from 0.272 to 0.694 for CWT compared to ST-GBLUP and ST-BayesCπ. MT-GBLUP and ST-BayesCπ showed similar prediction accuracies, while MT-BayesCπ showed the least biased evaluations. Additionally, our results suggested that prediction accuracy of low-heritability traits significantly increased when they were combined with traits with high genetic correlation in a multi-trait prediction. Our study suggests that multi-trait genomic predictions using GBLUP and Bayesian mixture prior models is feasible for genomic selection in beef cattle. Our findings indicate that MT-BayesCπ outperforms other models (ST-GBLUP, MT-GBLUP and ST-BayesCπ), especially for low-heritability traits.</p>","PeriodicalId":100086,"journal":{"name":"Animal Research and One Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aro2.13","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Research and One Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aro2.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multiple trait genomic selection incorporating correlated traits can improve the predictive ability of low-heritability traits. In this study, we evaluated genomic prediction accuracy using multi-trait BayesCπ method (MT-BayesCπ), which allows for a broader range of mixture priors for important traits in beef cattle. We compared the prediction performance of MT-BayesCπ with single-trait genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ST-GBLUP), multi-trait GBLUP (MT-GBLUP), and single-trait BayeCπ (ST-BayesCπ) methods. We found that ribeye area (REA) and ribeye weight (REWT) showed high heritability, while slaughter weight (SWT) and carcass weight (CWT) displayed medium heritability, and slaughter rate (SR) and feedlot average daily gain (FDG) showed low heritability. Highly positive genetic correlations were observed between CWT and SWT (0.981) and SR and REWT (0.921). Notably, the MT-BayesCπ method showed superior predictive abilities compared to other models. Using MT-BayesCπ method, the accuracy increased from 0.272 to 0.694 for CWT compared to ST-GBLUP and ST-BayesCπ. MT-GBLUP and ST-BayesCπ showed similar prediction accuracies, while MT-BayesCπ showed the least biased evaluations. Additionally, our results suggested that prediction accuracy of low-heritability traits significantly increased when they were combined with traits with high genetic correlation in a multi-trait prediction. Our study suggests that multi-trait genomic predictions using GBLUP and Bayesian mixture prior models is feasible for genomic selection in beef cattle. Our findings indicate that MT-BayesCπ outperforms other models (ST-GBLUP, MT-GBLUP and ST-BayesCπ), especially for low-heritability traits.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于GBLUP和贝叶斯混合先验模型的肉牛多性状基因组预测
结合相关性状的多性状基因组选择可以提高低遗传力性状的预测能力。在这项研究中,我们使用多性状贝叶斯Cπ方法(MT贝叶斯Cπ)评估了基因组预测的准确性,该方法为肉牛的重要性状提供了更广泛的混合先验。我们比较了MT贝叶斯Cπ与单特征基因组最佳线性无偏预测(ST-GBLUP)、多特征GBLUP(MT-GBLUP)和单特征贝叶斯Cπ(ST贝叶斯Cπ)方法的预测性能。结果表明,肋叶面积(REA)和肋叶重(REWT)具有较高的遗传力,屠宰重(SWT)和胴体重(CWT)具有中等遗传力,而屠宰率(SR)和饲养场平均日增重(FDG)具有较低的遗传力。CWT和SWT(0.981)以及SR和REWT(0.921)之间存在高度正相关。值得注意的是,与其他模型相比,MT-BayesCπ方法显示出优越的预测能力。与ST-GBLUP和ST-BayesCπ相比,使用MT-BayesCπ方法,CWT的精度从0.272提高到0.694。MT-GBLUP和ST-BayesCπ显示出相似的预测精度,而MT-BayesCπ显示出最小的偏差评估。此外,我们的研究结果表明,在多性状预测中,当低遗传力性状与高遗传相关性的性状相结合时,其预测精度显著提高。我们的研究表明,使用GBLUP和贝叶斯混合先验模型进行多性状基因组预测对于肉牛的基因组选择是可行的。我们的研究结果表明,MT贝叶斯Cπ优于其他模型(ST-GBLUP、MT-GBLUP和ST贝叶斯Cπ),尤其是在低遗传力性状方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Temperature and humidity as drivers for the transmission of zoonotic diseases Free iron accumulation and oxidative stress burden induce ferroptotic atrophy of chicken yolk sac during the late embryogenesis Selection of the most informative wavenumbers to improve prediction accuracy of milk fatty acid profile based on milk mid‐infrared spectra data Functional roles of folic acid in alleviating dexamethasone‐induced fatty liver syndrome in laying hens
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1