Dan Song, Tao Duan, Rong Li, Xiaoqiu Wang, Fengdong Zhang, Jia Feng, Lin Qiao, Junlin Cheng, Lixian Chen, Aike Li, Yuna Min, Weiwei Wang
Salpingitis is a highly prevalent disease that reduces production performance and egg quality in laying hens, severely impeding the sustainable development of the egg-laying industry. Fructooligosaccharides (FOS) play a significant role in regulating gut health and immune function. However, the mechanisms by which FOS alleviates salpingitis remain unclear. This study aimed to elucidate how FOS mitigates salpingitis using multi-omics approaches. A total of 270 34-week-old Hy-Line Brown laying hens were randomly assigned to three groups: a control group with a basal diet (CN), a lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-challenged group on a basal diet (CN_LPS), and an FOS-supplemented group (1 g/kg diet) with LPS challenge (FOS_LPS). The results showed that the supplementation of FOS significantly ameliorated LPS-induced inflammation and atrophy in the magnum of hens (p < 0.05). The mRNA expression levels of TLR2, MYD88, NF-κB, and COX2 in the FOS_LPS group were significantly reduced in the magnum compared to the CN_LPS group (p < 0.05). In contrast, the expression of ABCA9, BIRC5, and MYRF genes was significantly higher in the FOS_LPS group than in the CN_LPS group. Compared to the CN_LPS group, the FOS_LPS group exhibited a reduction in the abundance of Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group and Alistipes, whereas the abundances of Lactobacillus, Ruminococcus_torques_group, and Phascolarctobacterium were increased in cecal chyme. In addition, the FOS_LPS group exhibited elevated relative concentrations of S-lactoylglutathione and thymol sulfate in plasma as compared to the CN_LPS group. Collectively, FOS mitigated LPS-induced salpingitis by modulating key inflammatory pathways, restoring gut microbiota (e.g., increased Lactobacillus, decreased Rikenellaceae), and enhancing metabolic homeostasis.
{"title":"Multi-Omics Insights Into the Role of Fructooligosaccharides Supplementation in Alleviating Salpingitis in Laying Hens","authors":"Dan Song, Tao Duan, Rong Li, Xiaoqiu Wang, Fengdong Zhang, Jia Feng, Lin Qiao, Junlin Cheng, Lixian Chen, Aike Li, Yuna Min, Weiwei Wang","doi":"10.1002/aro2.70024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/aro2.70024","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Salpingitis is a highly prevalent disease that reduces production performance and egg quality in laying hens, severely impeding the sustainable development of the egg-laying industry. Fructooligosaccharides (FOS) play a significant role in regulating gut health and immune function. However, the mechanisms by which FOS alleviates salpingitis remain unclear. This study aimed to elucidate how FOS mitigates salpingitis using multi-omics approaches. A total of 270 34-week-old Hy-Line Brown laying hens were randomly assigned to three groups: a control group with a basal diet (CN), a lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-challenged group on a basal diet (CN_LPS), and an FOS-supplemented group (1 g/kg diet) with LPS challenge (FOS_LPS). The results showed that the supplementation of FOS significantly ameliorated LPS-induced inflammation and atrophy in the magnum of hens (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The mRNA expression levels of <i>TLR2</i>, <i>MYD88</i>, <i>NF-κB</i>, and <i>COX2</i> in the FOS_LPS group were significantly reduced in the magnum compared to the CN_LPS group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). In contrast, the expression of <i>ABCA9</i>, <i>BIRC5</i>, and <i>MYRF</i> genes was significantly higher in the FOS_LPS group than in the CN_LPS group. Compared to the CN_LPS group, the FOS_LPS group exhibited a reduction in the abundance of <i>Rikenellaceae</i>_<i>RC9</i>_<i>gut</i>_<i>group</i> and <i>Alistipes</i>, whereas the abundances of <i>Lactobacillus</i>, <i>Ruminococcus</i>_<i>torques</i>_<i>group</i>, and <i>Phascolarctobacterium</i> were increased in cecal chyme. In addition, the FOS_LPS group exhibited elevated relative concentrations of S-lactoylglutathione and thymol sulfate in plasma as compared to the CN_LPS group. Collectively, FOS mitigated LPS-induced salpingitis by modulating key inflammatory pathways, restoring gut microbiota (e.g., increased <i>Lactobacillus</i>, decreased <i>Rikenellaceae</i>), and enhancing metabolic homeostasis.</p>","PeriodicalId":100086,"journal":{"name":"Animal Research and One Health","volume":"4 1","pages":"105-119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aro2.70024","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146199381","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Xianglin Zeng, Wenzhi Liu, Zhaobin Wang, Kai Yang, Qiye Wang, Huansheng Yang
This study investigates the effects of different crude protein (CP) levels on growth performance, serum biochemistry, organ indices, intestinal morphology, colonic volatile fatty acids, and gut microbiota in Ningxiang finishing pigs. Ninety-six pigs (53.20 ± 0.53 kg) were randomly assigned to three dietary treatments: high-protein (HP, 15.56% CP), medium-protein (MP, 12.94% CP), and low-protein (LP, 10.31% CP), with four replicate pens per treatment and eight pigs per pen. Results showed that dietary CP levels had no significant effects on growth performance. However, the LP diet significantly reduced serum urea nitrogen, liver weight, and relative liver weight (p < 0.05). Additionally, jejunal crypt depth showed a linear decrease in response to graded reductions in dietary CP levels (Linear, p < 0.05). The LP diet significantly decreased the contents of isobutyric, isovaleric, and branched-chain fatty acids in colonic fermentation products (p < 0.05). Furthermore, 16S rRNA sequencing revealed that the relative abundances of Terrisporobacter, Marvinbryantia, Turicibacter, Lachnospiraceae_AC2044_group, unclassified_f_Peptostreptococcaceae, norank_f_Eubacter_coprostanoligenes_group, Lachnospiraceae_UCG-007, and UCG-009 were significantly higher in the LP group (p < 0.05). Spearman correlation analysis indicated that isobutyric acid and isovaleric acid were negatively correlated with Lactobacillus and positively correlated with Streptococcus. In conclusion, the LP diet improved colonic microbiota composition while maintaining growth performance in Ningxiang finishing pigs. These results advance our understanding of protein nutrition in indigenous fat-type pig breeds, providing a theoretical foundation for optimizing dietary formulations specifically in Ningxiang pigs.
{"title":"Effects of Dietary Protein Level on Growth Performance, Serum Biochemistry, Intestinal Morphology, and Intestinal Microbiota in Ningxiang Finishing Pigs","authors":"Xianglin Zeng, Wenzhi Liu, Zhaobin Wang, Kai Yang, Qiye Wang, Huansheng Yang","doi":"10.1002/aro2.70026","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/aro2.70026","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigates the effects of different crude protein (CP) levels on growth performance, serum biochemistry, organ indices, intestinal morphology, colonic volatile fatty acids, and gut microbiota in Ningxiang finishing pigs. Ninety-six pigs (53.20 ± 0.53 kg) were randomly assigned to three dietary treatments: high-protein (HP, 15.56% CP), medium-protein (MP, 12.94% CP), and low-protein (LP, 10.31% CP), with four replicate pens per treatment and eight pigs per pen. Results showed that dietary CP levels had no significant effects on growth performance. However, the LP diet significantly reduced serum urea nitrogen, liver weight, and relative liver weight (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Additionally, jejunal crypt depth showed a linear decrease in response to graded reductions in dietary CP levels (Linear, <i>p</i> < 0.05). The LP diet significantly decreased the contents of isobutyric, isovaleric, and branched-chain fatty acids in colonic fermentation products (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Furthermore, 16S rRNA sequencing revealed that the relative abundances of <i>Terrisporobacter</i>, <i>Marvinbryantia</i>, <i>Turicibacter</i>, <i>Lachnospiraceae_AC2044_group</i>, <i>unclassified_f_Peptostreptococcaceae</i>, <i>norank_f_Eubacter_coprostanoligenes_group</i>, <i>Lachnospiraceae_UCG-007</i>, and <i>UCG-009</i> were significantly higher in the LP group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Spearman correlation analysis indicated that isobutyric acid and isovaleric acid were negatively correlated with <i>Lactobacillus</i> and positively correlated with <i>Streptococcus</i>. In conclusion, the LP diet improved colonic microbiota composition while maintaining growth performance in Ningxiang finishing pigs. These results advance our understanding of protein nutrition in indigenous fat-type pig breeds, providing a theoretical foundation for optimizing dietary formulations specifically in Ningxiang pigs.</p>","PeriodicalId":100086,"journal":{"name":"Animal Research and One Health","volume":"4 1","pages":"120-131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aro2.70026","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146196964","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>Animal welfare is a crucial component of the One Health principle, which the World Health Organization (WHO) describes as “an integrated, unifying approach that aims to sustainably balance and optimize the health of people, animals, and ecosystems. It recognizes that the health of humans, domestic and wild animals, plants, and the wider environment (including ecosystems) are closely linked and interdependent.” (WHO, 2025) [<span>1</span>].</p><p>The relationship between humans and animals is multifaceted, encompassing emotional, economic, and social dimensions. Companion animals, such as dogs and cats, provide emotional support and improve mental health, reducing stress and loneliness. Working animals, such as horses and oxen, are indispensable in many agricultural communities, aiding in transportation and farming tasks. Ensuring their welfare directly impacts human livelihoods and economic stability. Perhaps the biggest area of human–animal interrelationship is in agriculture, where 92 billion land animals are produced worldwide every year for food.</p><p>Ensuring the well-being of animals is essential for several reasons. Firstly, animals can act as reservoirs for pathogens that may transmit to humans, leading to zoonotic diseases. By prioritizing animal welfare, we can reduce the risk of disease transmission and safeguard public health. Healthy animals are more resilient to infections, which minimizes the spread of diseases within animal populations and reduces the need for antimicrobial interventions.</p><p>This is particularly important in the context of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), a growing global health threat. Nearly three-quarters of all the world's antibiotics are fed to farmed animals, largely to control diseases inherent in the cramped, squalid conditions of industrial animal agriculture. This is a major reason for the WHO to warn that action is needed if we are to avoid a post-antibiotic era, where diseases that are currently treatable could once again kill. Experts suggest that by the middle of the century, the demise of antibiotics could lead to about 10 million deaths a year [<span>2, 3</span>].</p><p>More than 60% of new and emerging infectious diseases that threaten human health originate in animal populations. These threats are significantly increasing in frequency and severity over time, with tremendous long-term impacts [<span>4</span>].</p><p>COVID-19 is the latest example of a major pandemic caused by a zoonotic pathogen. However, there are many other zoonoses, including severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS-CoV), zoonotic influenza (H5N1, H7N9, H1N1), Zika, and Ebola virus diseases, which have or could potentially cause epidemics in humans.</p><p>The traditional single health system has not been effective at addressing these challenges. Outbreaks of infectious diseases in different species and regions not only pose a serious threat to human and animal health and survival bu
{"title":"Animal Welfare as an Essential Element of One Health","authors":"Philip Lymbery","doi":"10.1002/aro2.70021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/aro2.70021","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Animal welfare is a crucial component of the One Health principle, which the World Health Organization (WHO) describes as “an integrated, unifying approach that aims to sustainably balance and optimize the health of people, animals, and ecosystems. It recognizes that the health of humans, domestic and wild animals, plants, and the wider environment (including ecosystems) are closely linked and interdependent.” (WHO, 2025) [<span>1</span>].</p><p>The relationship between humans and animals is multifaceted, encompassing emotional, economic, and social dimensions. Companion animals, such as dogs and cats, provide emotional support and improve mental health, reducing stress and loneliness. Working animals, such as horses and oxen, are indispensable in many agricultural communities, aiding in transportation and farming tasks. Ensuring their welfare directly impacts human livelihoods and economic stability. Perhaps the biggest area of human–animal interrelationship is in agriculture, where 92 billion land animals are produced worldwide every year for food.</p><p>Ensuring the well-being of animals is essential for several reasons. Firstly, animals can act as reservoirs for pathogens that may transmit to humans, leading to zoonotic diseases. By prioritizing animal welfare, we can reduce the risk of disease transmission and safeguard public health. Healthy animals are more resilient to infections, which minimizes the spread of diseases within animal populations and reduces the need for antimicrobial interventions.</p><p>This is particularly important in the context of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), a growing global health threat. Nearly three-quarters of all the world's antibiotics are fed to farmed animals, largely to control diseases inherent in the cramped, squalid conditions of industrial animal agriculture. This is a major reason for the WHO to warn that action is needed if we are to avoid a post-antibiotic era, where diseases that are currently treatable could once again kill. Experts suggest that by the middle of the century, the demise of antibiotics could lead to about 10 million deaths a year [<span>2, 3</span>].</p><p>More than 60% of new and emerging infectious diseases that threaten human health originate in animal populations. These threats are significantly increasing in frequency and severity over time, with tremendous long-term impacts [<span>4</span>].</p><p>COVID-19 is the latest example of a major pandemic caused by a zoonotic pathogen. However, there are many other zoonoses, including severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS-CoV), zoonotic influenza (H5N1, H7N9, H1N1), Zika, and Ebola virus diseases, which have or could potentially cause epidemics in humans.</p><p>The traditional single health system has not been effective at addressing these challenges. Outbreaks of infectious diseases in different species and regions not only pose a serious threat to human and animal health and survival bu","PeriodicalId":100086,"journal":{"name":"Animal Research and One Health","volume":"3 4","pages":"454-457"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aro2.70021","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145470190","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Victoria Anthony Uyanga, Tolulope Grace Ogundipe, Onome Ejeromedoghene, Abigail Adamma Ere-Richard, Edikan Effiong Okon
Biopolymer-based hydrogels have emerged as functional materials with distinct characteristics such as nontoxicity, biocompatibility, biodegradability, and water absorption, which offer valuable properties that can contribute to sustainability and environmentally safe products. They can be modified and adapted for various applications, such as biomedical, pharmaceutical, industrial, textile, and agricultural purposes. With emerging concerns about environmental contamination and safe animal production practices for increased animal welfare and human health, research has increased in search of alternatives to antibiotics, bioactive substance delivery, and growth boosters that will promote sustainable production. The application of naturally derived and bio-based hydrogels presents a great opportunity for exploration and application for animal production purposes, especially as functional feed ingredients, feed processing, wound treatment, farm waste management, antibacterial agents, encapsulation, and nutrient delivery. This review provides an overview of recent research regarding the applications of hydrogels in animals and provides insights into areas with limited information to stimulate research interest in the utilization of hydrogel composites for animal growth, development, and health.
{"title":"Hydrogel Composites and Their Potential Application in Animal Production and Health","authors":"Victoria Anthony Uyanga, Tolulope Grace Ogundipe, Onome Ejeromedoghene, Abigail Adamma Ere-Richard, Edikan Effiong Okon","doi":"10.1002/aro2.70019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/aro2.70019","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Biopolymer-based hydrogels have emerged as functional materials with distinct characteristics such as nontoxicity, biocompatibility, biodegradability, and water absorption, which offer valuable properties that can contribute to sustainability and environmentally safe products. They can be modified and adapted for various applications, such as biomedical, pharmaceutical, industrial, textile, and agricultural purposes. With emerging concerns about environmental contamination and safe animal production practices for increased animal welfare and human health, research has increased in search of alternatives to antibiotics, bioactive substance delivery, and growth boosters that will promote sustainable production. The application of naturally derived and bio-based hydrogels presents a great opportunity for exploration and application for animal production purposes, especially as functional feed ingredients, feed processing, wound treatment, farm waste management, antibacterial agents, encapsulation, and nutrient delivery. This review provides an overview of recent research regarding the applications of hydrogels in animals and provides insights into areas with limited information to stimulate research interest in the utilization of hydrogel composites for animal growth, development, and health.</p>","PeriodicalId":100086,"journal":{"name":"Animal Research and One Health","volume":"4 1","pages":"2-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aro2.70019","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146199453","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Mingyu Wang, Ao Guo, Lin Zhang, Shengru Wu, Juan Du, Taiyong Yu
Rapid progress in sequencing technology has made it possible to study the genome and transcriptional maps of single cells. However, to fully grasp the intricacies of multicellular organisms, methods that enable high-throughput measurements while retaining spatial information about the tissue context or subcellular localization of the analyzed nucleic acids are essential. Over the past few years, as transcriptome research has advanced, the limitations of traditional transcriptomic approaches have become increasingly evident. In response, innovative sequencing techniques, such as spatial transcriptome sequencing, have emerged to better accommodate diverse research contexts. This review offers a comprehensive examination of the evolution and limitations of spatial transcriptomics. We summarize its applications in livestock and poultry research and explore its potential future developments. By providing insights into the current state and future directions of spatial transcriptomics, this review highlights its importance in advancing our understanding of complex biological systems.
{"title":"Technological Innovations and Applications of Spatial Transcriptomics in Livestock and Poultry Research","authors":"Mingyu Wang, Ao Guo, Lin Zhang, Shengru Wu, Juan Du, Taiyong Yu","doi":"10.1002/aro2.70016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/aro2.70016","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Rapid progress in sequencing technology has made it possible to study the genome and transcriptional maps of single cells. However, to fully grasp the intricacies of multicellular organisms, methods that enable high-throughput measurements while retaining spatial information about the tissue context or subcellular localization of the analyzed nucleic acids are essential. Over the past few years, as transcriptome research has advanced, the limitations of traditional transcriptomic approaches have become increasingly evident. In response, innovative sequencing techniques, such as spatial transcriptome sequencing, have emerged to better accommodate diverse research contexts. This review offers a comprehensive examination of the evolution and limitations of spatial transcriptomics. We summarize its applications in livestock and poultry research and explore its potential future developments. By providing insights into the current state and future directions of spatial transcriptomics, this review highlights its importance in advancing our understanding of complex biological systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":100086,"journal":{"name":"Animal Research and One Health","volume":"4 1","pages":"14-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aro2.70016","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146199429","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>Despite significant advancements in the field of animal welfare, its assessment still remains a methodological challenge, as an animal's affective state cannot always be directly measured, but must instead be inferred from behavioral, physiological, environmental, and nutritional indicators [<span>1, 2</span>]. This constraint has led to the exploration of artificial intelligence (AI)—driven tools—including machine learning (ML), computer vision, and sensor-based systems—as possible resources to facilitate dynamic, real-time welfare assessments, and predictive analytic [<span>3, 4</span>]. For example, AI-driven wearable sensors facilitate early detection of stress and disease by continuously monitoring vital signs, and behavioral patterns in cattle, pigs, and poultry [<span>5</span>], whereas machine learning can optimize feeding regimes, and identifies health conditions such as lameness [<span>6</span>]. In wildlife conservation, AI-enhanced technologies—including unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), thermal imaging, and acoustic monitoring—enable detailed tracking of animal movements, habitat use, and identification of anthropogenic threats such as poaching [<span>7, 8</span>]. AI applications are also emerging within zoological institutions, where neural networks and wearable sensors are employed to gather behavioral, and physiological data of captive animals, supporting their comprehensive welfare assessments [<span>9, 10</span>]. In the field of companion animals' care, AI innovations have advanced diagnostics, cancer screening, and real-time health monitoring through IoT (Internet of Thing)—enabled collars [<span>11, 12</span>]. AI is also making a significant impact in laboratory environments, where it supports the 3 Rs by reducing animals use through predictive toxicology frameworks such as the ONTOX project [<span>13</span>]. Additionally, automated husbandry systems employing AI are considered to be implemented to minimize human–animal interactions, thus reducing stress associated with handling [<span>14</span>].</p><p>Although artificial intelligence (AI) presents promising opportunities to identify how animals perceive and experience their own well-being—its integration into the animal welfare science remains limited [<span>15</span>]. This constraint is largely attributed to persistent practical, conceptual, and technical challenges that limit the widespread application, and translation of AI-based models in real-world animal welfare contexts [<span>16</span>].</p><p>A central technical constraint in AI implementation for animal welfare is the requirement for large, labeled datasets to train the algorithms [<span>17</span>]. Most deep learning models demand substantial volumes of high-quality, labeled data to achieve high accuracy in the performance, particularly for behavioral assessments [<span>18</span>]. Studies estimate that up to 1000 samples per behavioral class may be necessary for an accurate baseline classification, with so
{"title":"Digital Sentience? Evaluating the Integration of AI-Driven Tools in Animal Welfare Assessment","authors":"Sara Platto","doi":"10.1002/aro2.70018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/aro2.70018","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Despite significant advancements in the field of animal welfare, its assessment still remains a methodological challenge, as an animal's affective state cannot always be directly measured, but must instead be inferred from behavioral, physiological, environmental, and nutritional indicators [<span>1, 2</span>]. This constraint has led to the exploration of artificial intelligence (AI)—driven tools—including machine learning (ML), computer vision, and sensor-based systems—as possible resources to facilitate dynamic, real-time welfare assessments, and predictive analytic [<span>3, 4</span>]. For example, AI-driven wearable sensors facilitate early detection of stress and disease by continuously monitoring vital signs, and behavioral patterns in cattle, pigs, and poultry [<span>5</span>], whereas machine learning can optimize feeding regimes, and identifies health conditions such as lameness [<span>6</span>]. In wildlife conservation, AI-enhanced technologies—including unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), thermal imaging, and acoustic monitoring—enable detailed tracking of animal movements, habitat use, and identification of anthropogenic threats such as poaching [<span>7, 8</span>]. AI applications are also emerging within zoological institutions, where neural networks and wearable sensors are employed to gather behavioral, and physiological data of captive animals, supporting their comprehensive welfare assessments [<span>9, 10</span>]. In the field of companion animals' care, AI innovations have advanced diagnostics, cancer screening, and real-time health monitoring through IoT (Internet of Thing)—enabled collars [<span>11, 12</span>]. AI is also making a significant impact in laboratory environments, where it supports the 3 Rs by reducing animals use through predictive toxicology frameworks such as the ONTOX project [<span>13</span>]. Additionally, automated husbandry systems employing AI are considered to be implemented to minimize human–animal interactions, thus reducing stress associated with handling [<span>14</span>].</p><p>Although artificial intelligence (AI) presents promising opportunities to identify how animals perceive and experience their own well-being—its integration into the animal welfare science remains limited [<span>15</span>]. This constraint is largely attributed to persistent practical, conceptual, and technical challenges that limit the widespread application, and translation of AI-based models in real-world animal welfare contexts [<span>16</span>].</p><p>A central technical constraint in AI implementation for animal welfare is the requirement for large, labeled datasets to train the algorithms [<span>17</span>]. Most deep learning models demand substantial volumes of high-quality, labeled data to achieve high accuracy in the performance, particularly for behavioral assessments [<span>18</span>]. Studies estimate that up to 1000 samples per behavioral class may be necessary for an accurate baseline classification, with so","PeriodicalId":100086,"journal":{"name":"Animal Research and One Health","volume":"3 3","pages":"344-347"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aro2.70018","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144833156","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The rise of antibiotic-resistant bacteria has intensified global interest in antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) as promising feed additives. Although AMPs were initially considered less prone to resistance due to their broad-spectrum activity, recent studies have revealed an alarming increase in bacterial resistance to AMPs, though the mechanisms remain poorly understood. In this study, we demonstrate that Staphylococcus aureus can develop stable resistance to the plectasin-derived AMP NZ2114, as well as nisin and bacitracin, after 35 consecutive days of exposure. Comparative genomic analysis identified five candidate genes associated with resistance, with functional assays revealing significant mutations in ndh (Gln287*), lytD (Ala138Thr), and braS (Asn130Asp) as key contributors. Knockout studies showed that Δndh strains exhibited increased resistance to NZ2114, bacitracin, and nisin, alongside reduced intracellular ROS levels and rifampicin mutation rates. In contrast, ΔlytD and ΔbraS mutants displayed diminished resistance to NZ2114 and bacitracin, with enhanced biofilm formation in ΔlytD and reduced biofilm capacity in ΔbraS. To further investigate these mutations, we generated in situ complementation strains ∆::lytD-A138T and ∆::braS-N130D, both of which showed heightened resistance compared to wild type, indicating that functional alterations, rather than gene loss, mediate resistance. Notably, resistance phenotypes correlated inversely with bacterial surface anion levels, emphasizing the importance of electrostatic interactions between cationic AMPs and bacterial surface anions in antimicrobial efficacy. These findings provide novel insights into the mechanisms of AMP resistance in S. aureus, highlighting the risk of cross-resistance and underscoring the need for stringent control of AMP use to mitigate the emergence of resistance.
{"title":"Emergence of Staphylococcus aureus Resistance to Antimicrobial Peptides Nisin, NZ2114 and Bacitracin Involves Multiple Phenotypic Changes","authors":"Lingyu Xiao, Xingyuan Ma, Ping Tian, Lianbin Li, Zafir Muhammad, Xiaokun Wang, Xuemei Xue, Jinhe Xiao, Liangjun Zheng, F. A. El-Gohary, Xin Zhao, Junning Pu, Huping Xue","doi":"10.1002/aro2.70014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/aro2.70014","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The rise of antibiotic-resistant bacteria has intensified global interest in antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) as promising feed additives. Although AMPs were initially considered less prone to resistance due to their broad-spectrum activity, recent studies have revealed an alarming increase in bacterial resistance to AMPs, though the mechanisms remain poorly understood. In this study, we demonstrate that <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> can develop stable resistance to the plectasin-derived AMP NZ2114, as well as nisin and bacitracin, after 35 consecutive days of exposure. Comparative genomic analysis identified five candidate genes associated with resistance, with functional assays revealing significant mutations in <i>ndh</i> (Gln287*), <i>lytD</i> (Ala138Thr), and <i>braS</i> (Asn130Asp) as key contributors. Knockout studies showed that Δ<i>ndh</i> strains exhibited increased resistance to NZ2114, bacitracin, and nisin, alongside reduced intracellular ROS levels and rifampicin mutation rates. In contrast, Δ<i>lytD</i> and Δ<i>braS</i> mutants displayed diminished resistance to NZ2114 and bacitracin, with enhanced biofilm formation in Δ<i>lytD</i> and reduced biofilm capacity in Δ<i>braS</i>. To further investigate these mutations, we generated in situ complementation strains <i>∆</i>::<i>lytD-</i>A138T and ∆::<i>braS-</i>N130D, both of which showed heightened resistance compared to wild type, indicating that functional alterations, rather than gene loss, mediate resistance. Notably, resistance phenotypes correlated inversely with bacterial surface anion levels, emphasizing the importance of electrostatic interactions between cationic AMPs and bacterial surface anions in antimicrobial efficacy. These findings provide novel insights into the mechanisms of AMP resistance in <i>S. aureus</i>, highlighting the risk of cross-resistance and underscoring the need for stringent control of AMP use to mitigate the emergence of resistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":100086,"journal":{"name":"Animal Research and One Health","volume":"4 1","pages":"82-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aro2.70014","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146196956","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
“One Health” concept is a worldwide strategy characterized by promoting the integration of human, animal, and environmental health through cross-disciplinary, cross-sectoral, cross-regional communication, and collaboration, aiming to improve health and well-being through the prevention of risks and the mitigation of effects of crises [1]. There was a worldwide consensus on implementing the “One Health” strategy, emphasizing its ability to sustainably improve the health of humans, animals, and ecosystems. “One Health” strategy is critical for tackling modern challenges such as emerging zoonotic diseases, food safety, climate change, and antimicrobial resistance. What's more, animal welfare is an essential part of the “One Health” framework, with animal and human health and the environment being interconnected [2].
Annually, the health of untold millions of lives around the world are threatened by existing or novel emerging zoonotic diseases. Emerging or re-emerging of the zoonotic infectious diseases is suggested to be promoted by increasing human–animal contacts, international trade of animals, and the expansion of global travel [3]. The transmission and epidemic of zoonotic diseases is a dynamic process, which is jointly affected by all relevant links among humans, animals, and environment, forming a complex network. Given the more and more serious and complex epidemic of zoonotic diseases that have become a globally substantial risk to the health of animals and humans, it is clear that the “One Health” concept must be addressed for combating emerging zoonotic diseases at the human–animal–environment interface. When the practice of “One Health” concept is properly implemented, it will be an effective strategy to tackle zoonotic diseases. The European Union and the United States have provided funding to support interdisciplinary research within the “One Health” strategy, such as research on interventions for emerging zoonotic diseases and early warning systems of threats to humans from animals [4]. It is reported that investing in the “One Health” concept to mitigate pandemics by reducing the impact of their underlying drivers are likely to be more effective than business as usual, saving over $300 billion worldwide over the next century [5]. A five-step framework, “Generalizable One Health Framework (GOHF)”, was developed by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), which provides structure for using the “One Health” approach in zoonotic disease programs being implemented in technical domains including laboratory, surveillance, joint outbreak response, prevention and control, preparedness, communication, and government and policy at the local, sub-national, national, regional, or international level [6]. In China, the “One Health” concept is gaining recognition as an effective way
“同一个健康”概念是一项全球战略,其特点是通过跨学科、跨部门、跨区域的沟通与协作,促进人类、动物和环境健康的一体化,旨在通过预防风险和减轻危机影响来改善健康和福祉[b]。全球对实施“同一个健康”战略达成共识,强调其可持续改善人类、动物和生态系统健康的能力。“同一个健康”战略对于应对新出现的人畜共患疾病、食品安全、气候变化和抗微生物药物耐药性等现代挑战至关重要。此外,动物福利是“一个健康”框架的重要组成部分,动物和人类的健康以及环境是相互关联的。每年,世界各地数以百万计的生命的健康受到现有或新出现的人畜共患疾病的威胁。人与动物接触的增加、国际动物贸易的增加以及全球旅游的扩大都可能促进人畜共患传染病的出现或再出现。人畜共患疾病的传播和流行是一个动态过程,受人、动物、环境等各相关环节的共同影响,形成一个复杂的网络。鉴于人畜共患疾病的流行越来越严重和复杂,已成为全球动物和人类健康的重大风险,显然,必须在人-动物-环境界面上处理“同一个健康”概念,以防治新出现的人畜共患疾病。当“一个健康”的理念得到正确实施时,它将是应对人畜共患疾病的有效策略。欧盟和美国提供了资金,支持“同一个健康”战略下的跨学科研究,例如研究对新出现的人畜共患疾病的干预措施和动物对人类威胁的早期预警系统。据报告,投资于“同一个健康”概念,通过减少其潜在驱动因素的影响来减轻大流行病,可能比一切照旧更有效,在下个世纪在全世界节省3 000多亿美元。美国疾病控制和预防中心(CDC)和联合国粮食及农业组织(FAO)制定了一个五步框架,即“可推广的同一个健康框架”,该框架为在实验室、监测、联合疫情应对、预防和控制、准备、沟通以及地方政府和政策等技术领域实施的人畜共患疾病规划中使用“同一个健康”方法提供了结构。次国家级、国家级、地区级或国际级[6]。在中国,“同一个健康”作为对抗人畜共患疾病的有效途径,在人-动物-环境界面得到认可,布鲁氏菌病、新冠肺炎、日本血吸虫病、鼠疫的综合防控是“同一个健康”理念的具体实践。即使“同一个健康”概念的实践已成功地应用于防治人畜共患疾病,人类和动物卫生部门之间零散的沟通仍然是一个障碍,动物杂志上关于“同一个健康”概念的特刊仍然很少。《动物研究与同一个健康》的研究课题旨在收集世界范围内关于“同一个健康”理念和动物种群中人畜共患疾病的发现,内容涉及环境卫生、动物健康、动物福利和人畜共患疾病的预防与控制。不适当的动物和人类排泄物管理既会造成环境(例如水和土壤)的污染,也会导致抗菌素耐药性的蔓延,因此需要进行联合管理。水果和蔬菜的果皮往往被视为废物,导致环境污染。在我们的研究课题中,Haider等人总结了果蔬皮作为动物饲料的环境和营养价值,表明果蔬皮可以增强动物的健康,并且利用果蔬皮作为动物饲料可以显著减少有机废物的积累和废物分解相关的温室气体排放。毫无疑问,自20世纪50年代以来,随着大气温度的升高,地球正在变暖。肉鸡长期暴露在环境温度(高于30°C)下会诱发威胁动物健康的应激行为反应。在我们的研究课题中,Cyrille d 'Alex等人评估了陶土饮水器和/或补充ASPRO-C Plus对炎热气候下饲养的肉鸡的动物技术性能和生理反应的影响。dsRNA在环境中的快速降解引起了人们对其残留效应和环境污染的关注。 在我们的研究课题中,Huang等人总结了基于rna的生物农药从理论发现到技术成熟的发展轨迹,表明基于rna的生物农药具有特异性靶向病原体而不损害水产养殖生物或环境的潜力。几十年来,动物福利一直是许多社会关注的问题,也是人类和环境健康的一个组成部分,影响着食物链的安全性和食源性疾病的发病率[10]。在我们的研究主题中,Dixon写了一篇简短的评论,强调了动物福利科学在动物研究和“同一个健康”中的重要性。科恩-奥弗顿还写了一篇简短的评论,重点关注动物福利研究在政策中的引用情况,使用奥弗顿数据库来提供对研究引用模式的见解。众所周知,人畜共患疾病是通过直接接触、吸入、摄入或接种传染性物质,从自由生活的动物自然传播给人类的传染病,占影响人类的传染性生物的61%[9,10]。在21世纪,来自动物的新型人畜共患疾病,如SARS、寨卡病毒、黄热病病毒、登革热病毒和禽流感,数量不断增加。在我们的研究课题中,Liang等人阐明了非人类灵长类动物中病毒的多样性和丰度,并评估了哪些病毒对人类的人畜共患传播具有最大的潜在风险。由革兰氏阴性布鲁氏菌引起的布鲁氏菌病是一种常见的人畜共患病,严重危害动物和人类的健康和安全。迄今为止,开展动物疫苗接种运动是预防布鲁氏菌病在高流行地区传播的最有效控制战略。在我们的研究课题中,Li等人通过诱导布鲁氏菌抗血清获得了一个粗略的突变菌株RA343,这表明RA343菌株是一种很有希望的新型候选疫苗,可以保护动物免受B. abortus和B. melitensis感染。自2020年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)爆发以来,mRNA疫苗一直在使用。在我们的研究主题中,Alam等人写了一篇简短的评论,讨论了mRNA疫苗作为一种有前途的Mpox保健策略的开发进展。沙门氏菌是一种宿主受限的病原体,可在人类和动物体内引起多种疾病。在我们的研究课题中,Wu等人调查了全球白痢沙门氏菌的基因组特征,并进一步研究了其在中国的进化和耐药基因。家禽球虫病是家禽业中一种全球流行的疾病,主要是由各种艾美耳球虫寄生在肠上皮细胞上引起的。在我们的研究课题中,Chen等人概述了天然产物在球虫病治疗中的治疗潜力以及有效控制球虫病的作用方式。综合考虑环境卫生、动物卫生、动物福利、人畜共患疾病防控等问题,对践行“同一个健康”理念,实现全球健康具有重要意义。李鹏:构思、形式分析、监督、资金获取、撰写-原稿、撰写-审稿、编辑。丁家波:构思、形式分析、资金获取、撰写-原稿、撰写-审稿、编辑。作者声明,这项研究是在没有任何商业或财务关系的情况下进行的,这可能被解释为潜在的利益冲突。
{"title":"One Health and Zoonotic Diseases: A Collaborative Approach to Global Health","authors":"Peng Li, Jiabo Ding","doi":"10.1002/aro2.70011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/aro2.70011","url":null,"abstract":"<p>“One Health” concept is a worldwide strategy characterized by promoting the integration of human, animal, and environmental health through cross-disciplinary, cross-sectoral, cross-regional communication, and collaboration, aiming to improve health and well-being through the prevention of risks and the mitigation of effects of crises [<span>1</span>]. There was a worldwide consensus on implementing the “One Health” strategy, emphasizing its ability to sustainably improve the health of humans, animals, and ecosystems. “One Health” strategy is critical for tackling modern challenges such as emerging zoonotic diseases, food safety, climate change, and antimicrobial resistance. What's more, animal welfare is an essential part of the “One Health” framework, with animal and human health and the environment being interconnected [<span>2</span>].</p><p>Annually, the health of untold millions of lives around the world are threatened by existing or novel emerging zoonotic diseases. Emerging or re-emerging of the zoonotic infectious diseases is suggested to be promoted by increasing human–animal contacts, international trade of animals, and the expansion of global travel [<span>3</span>]. The transmission and epidemic of zoonotic diseases is a dynamic process, which is jointly affected by all relevant links among humans, animals, and environment, forming a complex network. Given the more and more serious and complex epidemic of zoonotic diseases that have become a globally substantial risk to the health of animals and humans, it is clear that the “One Health” concept must be addressed for combating emerging zoonotic diseases at the human–animal–environment interface. When the practice of “One Health” concept is properly implemented, it will be an effective strategy to tackle zoonotic diseases. The European Union and the United States have provided funding to support interdisciplinary research within the “One Health” strategy, such as research on interventions for emerging zoonotic diseases and early warning systems of threats to humans from animals [<span>4</span>]. It is reported that investing in the “One Health” concept to mitigate pandemics by reducing the impact of their underlying drivers are likely to be more effective than business as usual, saving over $300 billion worldwide over the next century [<span>5</span>]. A five-step framework, “Generalizable One Health Framework (GOHF)”, was developed by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), which provides structure for using the “One Health” approach in zoonotic disease programs being implemented in technical domains including laboratory, surveillance, joint outbreak response, prevention and control, preparedness, communication, and government and policy at the local, sub-national, national, regional, or international level [<span>6</span>]. In China, the “One Health” concept is gaining recognition as an effective way","PeriodicalId":100086,"journal":{"name":"Animal Research and One Health","volume":"3 2","pages":"146-148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aro2.70011","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144091185","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Rabies is a fatal disease caused by a virus belonging to the genus Lyssavirus in the family Rhabdoviridae. The virus has the potential to infect all warm-blooded animals, with primary reservoirs including dogs, wild carnivores (such as foxes, jackals, hyenas, and skunks), and bats. These reservoirs pose a significant public health risk, particularly in regions where human–animal interactions are frequent. The Somali Region in Ethiopia is predominantly home to pastoral and agropastoral communities, which inhabit vast swathes of land with diverse wildlife populations. The coexistence of these communities, domestic animals, and wildlife presents a unique environmental challenge that requires careful management. In times of drought, pastoralists may be compelled to migrate to remote and isolated habitats in search of grazing lands, resulting in heightened interaction between livestock and wildlife. The major causes of rabies outbreaks in the Somali Region include increased interaction between wildlife and livestock in remote pastoral settings without adequate control measures, such as lack of mass vaccination for at-risk dogs, low dog ownership rates, poor animal health infrastructure, limited diagnostic capacity, and weak surveillance systems. Comprehensive response of one-health approach is necessary to prevent and control rabies outbreaks in the Somali Region. These include increasing vaccination coverage for at-risk dogs, improving the animal health infrastructure, enhancing surveillance systems, increasing awareness and education, and strengthening wildlife management. These measures can improve the health and well-being of animals and humans. This review aims to highlight the major causes of rabies outbreaks and the need to implement a one-health approach in the Somali Region.
{"title":"Major Causes of Rabies Outbreak in Pastoral Areas of the Somali Region and Importance of the One Health Approach","authors":"Hassan Abdi Hussein","doi":"10.1002/aro2.70017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/aro2.70017","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Rabies is a fatal disease caused by a virus belonging to the genus Lyssavirus in the family Rhabdoviridae. The virus has the potential to infect all warm-blooded animals, with primary reservoirs including dogs, wild carnivores (such as foxes, jackals, hyenas, and skunks), and bats. These reservoirs pose a significant public health risk, particularly in regions where human–animal interactions are frequent. The Somali Region in Ethiopia is predominantly home to pastoral and agropastoral communities, which inhabit vast swathes of land with diverse wildlife populations. The coexistence of these communities, domestic animals, and wildlife presents a unique environmental challenge that requires careful management. In times of drought, pastoralists may be compelled to migrate to remote and isolated habitats in search of grazing lands, resulting in heightened interaction between livestock and wildlife. The major causes of rabies outbreaks in the Somali Region include increased interaction between wildlife and livestock in remote pastoral settings without adequate control measures, such as lack of mass vaccination for at-risk dogs, low dog ownership rates, poor animal health infrastructure, limited diagnostic capacity, and weak surveillance systems. Comprehensive response of one-health approach is necessary to prevent and control rabies outbreaks in the Somali Region. These include increasing vaccination coverage for at-risk dogs, improving the animal health infrastructure, enhancing surveillance systems, increasing awareness and education, and strengthening wildlife management. These measures can improve the health and well-being of animals and humans. This review aims to highlight the major causes of rabies outbreaks and the need to implement a one-health approach in the Somali Region.</p>","PeriodicalId":100086,"journal":{"name":"Animal Research and One Health","volume":"4 1","pages":"28-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aro2.70017","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146196961","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>The field of animal welfare research has grown rapidly over the last 20 years [<span>1</span>]. Although it has been possible to analyze the citation performance of these research works within academia either to understand their scientific significance or for evaluation purposes (and measure the “academic impact”), conducting similar analyses beyond academia has proven to be much more difficult until recently. Nevertheless, demonstrating the “societal impact” of research—its relevance and use beyond academia, particularly in policy—has become increasingly important for researchers. Altmetrics tools have emerged to track how research is cited in non-academic spheres such as news outlets, social media, and policy documents.</p><p>This commentary highlights the citedness of peer reviewed animal welfare research in policy. Although this analysis provides insights into citation patterns of the research, further research is needed to contextualize why those outputs got cited by policymakers.</p><p>Overton is a trusted and comprehensive full text policy document database. These documents produced by government bodies, intergovernmental organizations (IGOs), health agencies, and think tanks are linked to the academic research they cite. Overton also tracks policy to policy citations enabling deeper analysis of how ideas propagate within the policymaking process.</p><p>A policy document in Overton is defined “as a publication written by or primarily for policymakers.” This definition intends to be broad in order to capture any publications aimed at policymakers.</p><p>The database covers documents from over 190 countries and more than 100 IGOs, but there are some geographical disparities due to the availability of the policy documents. Overton only captures policy documents which are available online and this means that the numbers and locations of policy documents in Overton show a bias toward knowledge economies and other countries with a stronger productivity and online presence. Additionally, its coverage of policy documents is strongest from 2015 onward, with 79% of its documents published after 2012.</p><p>The commentary analyzed animal welfare research published between 2003 and 2022, using OpenAlex to identify 9315 primary articles. Of these, 4060 had Digital Object Identifier (DOI) bearing in mind that some of the author affiliation data were missing for 19% of DOIs.</p><p>Five hundred and fifty-eight of those DOIs (14%) were cited by at least one policy document according to Overton. Interestingly, the 2021 Pinheiro study suggested that less than 6% of academic outputs get referenced in policy documents (this percentage tends to fluctuate depending on the research area and also the age of the cited research which has more time to accrue citations) [<span>2</span>]. This would indicate that animal welfare is relatively well-represented in policy discussions.</p><p>Overall, the citation distribution is skewed with nearly half (48%) of the cited
{"title":"The Citedness of Animal Welfare Research in Policy Using the Overton Database","authors":"Nathalie Cornée","doi":"10.1002/aro2.70010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/aro2.70010","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The field of animal welfare research has grown rapidly over the last 20 years [<span>1</span>]. Although it has been possible to analyze the citation performance of these research works within academia either to understand their scientific significance or for evaluation purposes (and measure the “academic impact”), conducting similar analyses beyond academia has proven to be much more difficult until recently. Nevertheless, demonstrating the “societal impact” of research—its relevance and use beyond academia, particularly in policy—has become increasingly important for researchers. Altmetrics tools have emerged to track how research is cited in non-academic spheres such as news outlets, social media, and policy documents.</p><p>This commentary highlights the citedness of peer reviewed animal welfare research in policy. Although this analysis provides insights into citation patterns of the research, further research is needed to contextualize why those outputs got cited by policymakers.</p><p>Overton is a trusted and comprehensive full text policy document database. These documents produced by government bodies, intergovernmental organizations (IGOs), health agencies, and think tanks are linked to the academic research they cite. Overton also tracks policy to policy citations enabling deeper analysis of how ideas propagate within the policymaking process.</p><p>A policy document in Overton is defined “as a publication written by or primarily for policymakers.” This definition intends to be broad in order to capture any publications aimed at policymakers.</p><p>The database covers documents from over 190 countries and more than 100 IGOs, but there are some geographical disparities due to the availability of the policy documents. Overton only captures policy documents which are available online and this means that the numbers and locations of policy documents in Overton show a bias toward knowledge economies and other countries with a stronger productivity and online presence. Additionally, its coverage of policy documents is strongest from 2015 onward, with 79% of its documents published after 2012.</p><p>The commentary analyzed animal welfare research published between 2003 and 2022, using OpenAlex to identify 9315 primary articles. Of these, 4060 had Digital Object Identifier (DOI) bearing in mind that some of the author affiliation data were missing for 19% of DOIs.</p><p>Five hundred and fifty-eight of those DOIs (14%) were cited by at least one policy document according to Overton. Interestingly, the 2021 Pinheiro study suggested that less than 6% of academic outputs get referenced in policy documents (this percentage tends to fluctuate depending on the research area and also the age of the cited research which has more time to accrue citations) [<span>2</span>]. This would indicate that animal welfare is relatively well-represented in policy discussions.</p><p>Overall, the citation distribution is skewed with nearly half (48%) of the cited","PeriodicalId":100086,"journal":{"name":"Animal Research and One Health","volume":"3 2","pages":"181-184"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aro2.70010","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144091243","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}