Enforcing Trust: Race, gender, and the policing of citizenship in Rio de Janeiro

Pub Date : 2023-04-10 DOI:10.1111/ciso.12447
Marta-Laura Haynes
{"title":"Enforcing Trust: Race, gender, and the policing of citizenship in Rio de Janeiro","authors":"Marta-Laura Haynes","doi":"10.1111/ciso.12447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Policing in Rio de Janeiro is notorious for its brutality. For <i>Unidades da Policía Pacificadora</i> (UPP), a proximity policing program marked by less overt violence, the forging of trust became a strategy for reshaping the image of police and <i>favelas</i>. Yet, this policing model reproduced racial and gender bias that was persistent in broader Brazilian society where trust is coded as white and female while danger is coded as Black and male. In UPP, these ideologies manifested in using lighter-skinned and female officers to produce trust through whiteness and gender. For residents, pacification underscored a longstanding racial encoding of citizenship and trust as performances of whiteness and belonging. Based on fieldwork conducted between 2010 and 2015 among the military police and in <i>favelas</i>, I examine in this article how Brazilian ideologies of race and gender intersect with local notions about trustworthiness and class. For the UPPs, enforcing trust was attached to the expectation of submission and uniformity—ultimately strengthening white supremacy. Through intimate ethnographic accounts of commanders' and residents' experiences, I show the nuanced ways trust intersects with local ideas about race and gender and how it served both as a vehicle for pacification and as a mode of citizenship.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ciso.12447","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Policing in Rio de Janeiro is notorious for its brutality. For Unidades da Policía Pacificadora (UPP), a proximity policing program marked by less overt violence, the forging of trust became a strategy for reshaping the image of police and favelas. Yet, this policing model reproduced racial and gender bias that was persistent in broader Brazilian society where trust is coded as white and female while danger is coded as Black and male. In UPP, these ideologies manifested in using lighter-skinned and female officers to produce trust through whiteness and gender. For residents, pacification underscored a longstanding racial encoding of citizenship and trust as performances of whiteness and belonging. Based on fieldwork conducted between 2010 and 2015 among the military police and in favelas, I examine in this article how Brazilian ideologies of race and gender intersect with local notions about trustworthiness and class. For the UPPs, enforcing trust was attached to the expectation of submission and uniformity—ultimately strengthening white supremacy. Through intimate ethnographic accounts of commanders' and residents' experiences, I show the nuanced ways trust intersects with local ideas about race and gender and how it served both as a vehicle for pacification and as a mode of citizenship.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
强制执行信任:里约热内卢的种族、性别和公民治安
里约热内卢的警察因其残暴而臭名昭著。对于太平洋警察联合会(UPP)来说,建立信任成为重塑警察和贫民窟形象的一种策略。然而,这种警务模式再现了在更广泛的巴西社会中持续存在的种族和性别偏见,在巴西社会中,信任被编码为白人和女性,而危险被编码为黑人和男性。在UPP中,这些意识形态表现在利用肤色较浅的女性军官通过白人和性别来产生信任。对居民来说,安抚强调了长期以来的种族编码,即公民身份和信任是白人和归属感的表现。基于2010年至2015年在宪兵和贫民窟进行的实地调查,我在这篇文章中研究了巴西的种族和性别意识形态如何与当地关于可信度和阶级的观念相交叉。对UPP来说,强制执行信任与顺从和统一的期望相联系,最终加强了白人至上主义。通过对指挥官和居民经历的深入民族志描述,我展示了信任与当地种族和性别观念的微妙交叉方式,以及它如何既是安抚的工具,又是公民身份的一种模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1