Focus versus format: An American view of South Korea's regional engagement

IF 1 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Asian Politics & Policy Pub Date : 2023-01-11 DOI:10.1111/aspp.12677
Zack Cooper
{"title":"Focus versus format: An American view of South Korea's regional engagement","authors":"Zack Cooper","doi":"10.1111/aspp.12677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The United States and South Korea are both shifting their engagement in the Indo-Pacific, but in fundamentally different ways. In recent years, Washington has altered the format of its engagement in the region—shifting toward an increasingly minilateral approach seen in the Quad and AUKUS arrangements. On the other hand, Seoul has sought primarily to alter the focus of its engagement—shifting from a narrow focus on the Korean Peninsula toward a broader regional approach. In other words, American leaders have adjusted the format of their engagement while Korean leaders have adjusted the focus of their engagement. This has created a disconnect. As South Korea has aligned its focus to that of the United States, Seoul has expected Washington to integrate South Korea more deeply into American regional strategy. Yet, US efforts to build minilaterals have seldom included South Korea. Addressing this divide will require leaders in both capitals to adjust their approaches to both focus and format in the Indo-Pacific.</p>","PeriodicalId":44747,"journal":{"name":"Asian Politics & Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Politics & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aspp.12677","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The United States and South Korea are both shifting their engagement in the Indo-Pacific, but in fundamentally different ways. In recent years, Washington has altered the format of its engagement in the region—shifting toward an increasingly minilateral approach seen in the Quad and AUKUS arrangements. On the other hand, Seoul has sought primarily to alter the focus of its engagement—shifting from a narrow focus on the Korean Peninsula toward a broader regional approach. In other words, American leaders have adjusted the format of their engagement while Korean leaders have adjusted the focus of their engagement. This has created a disconnect. As South Korea has aligned its focus to that of the United States, Seoul has expected Washington to integrate South Korea more deeply into American regional strategy. Yet, US efforts to build minilaterals have seldom included South Korea. Addressing this divide will require leaders in both capitals to adjust their approaches to both focus and format in the Indo-Pacific.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
焦点与形式:美国对韩国区域参与的看法
美国和韩国都在改变其在印太地区的参与,但方式根本不同。近年来,华盛顿改变了其在该地区的参与形式,转向了四方会谈和AUKUS安排中日益小型化的方式。另一方面,首尔主要试图改变其接触的重点——从狭隘的关注朝鲜半岛转向更广泛的地区方法。换言之,美国领导人调整了接触形式,而韩国领导人则调整了接触重点。这造成了断开连接。随着韩国将其重点与美国保持一致,首尔方面预计华盛顿将更深入地将韩国纳入美国的地区战略。然而,美国建设小型支线的努力很少包括韩国。解决这一分歧需要两国首都的领导人调整他们的方法,以适应印太地区的重点和形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Politics & Policy
Asian Politics & Policy POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊最新文献
Issue Information The agency of small states in the United States-China rivalry The Hirschman effect re-examined from the perspective of security perception: A case study of Southeast Asian countries and China Inconsequential setback: The elusive impact of the Afghanistan withdrawal on Chinese assessment of US credibility Explaining the expansion of the NGO sector in China: Through the lense of adaptive corporatist governance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1