China's strategic distastes for Korea in the Indo-Pacific strategy: Major concerns and countermeasures

IF 1 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Asian Politics & Policy Pub Date : 2023-01-13 DOI:10.1111/aspp.12674
Jaewoo Choo
{"title":"China's strategic distastes for Korea in the Indo-Pacific strategy: Major concerns and countermeasures","authors":"Jaewoo Choo","doi":"10.1111/aspp.12674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>China sees South Korea's full access will perfect the Indo-Pacific strategy, dealing a detrimental blow to its national security interests for three reasons, geography, economics, and defense. The Indo-Pacific strategy is also a strategy based on network building. However, the inherent nature of the network limits the membership to allies, “like-minded states,” and supporters to the rule-based order. While Korea still holds reservations about making a full-fledged commitment to the strategy, China is to do its utmost including coercive measures to prevent it from joining it. In this light, the article will first analyze the reasons why China opposes Korea joining the strategy. China's strategic interest against the Indo-Pacific strategy will be inferred to substantiate its objection to Korea's participation. The article will also explain the imperatives for Korea to join the strategy. It will conclude with some remarks that can help the United States. induce Korea's commitment and vice versa.</p>","PeriodicalId":44747,"journal":{"name":"Asian Politics & Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Politics & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aspp.12674","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

China sees South Korea's full access will perfect the Indo-Pacific strategy, dealing a detrimental blow to its national security interests for three reasons, geography, economics, and defense. The Indo-Pacific strategy is also a strategy based on network building. However, the inherent nature of the network limits the membership to allies, “like-minded states,” and supporters to the rule-based order. While Korea still holds reservations about making a full-fledged commitment to the strategy, China is to do its utmost including coercive measures to prevent it from joining it. In this light, the article will first analyze the reasons why China opposes Korea joining the strategy. China's strategic interest against the Indo-Pacific strategy will be inferred to substantiate its objection to Korea's participation. The article will also explain the imperatives for Korea to join the strategy. It will conclude with some remarks that can help the United States. induce Korea's commitment and vice versa.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国在印太战略中对朝鲜的战略厌恶:主要关切与对策
中国认为,韩国的全面访问将完善印太战略,对其国家安全利益造成不利打击,原因有三:地理、经济和国防。印太战略也是一项基于网络建设的战略。然而,该网络的固有性质将成员资格限制在盟友、“志同道合的国家”和基于规则的秩序的支持者。尽管韩国对全面实施该战略仍持保留态度,但中国将尽最大努力,包括采取强制性措施阻止其加入该战略。有鉴于此,本文将首先分析中国反对韩国加入该战略的原因。中国反对印太战略的战略利益将被推断为证实其对韩国参与的反对。文章还将解释韩国加入该战略的必要性。它将以一些可以帮助美国的言论结束。促使韩国作出承诺,反之亦然。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Politics & Policy
Asian Politics & Policy POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊最新文献
Issue Information The agency of small states in the United States-China rivalry The Hirschman effect re-examined from the perspective of security perception: A case study of Southeast Asian countries and China Inconsequential setback: The elusive impact of the Afghanistan withdrawal on Chinese assessment of US credibility Explaining the expansion of the NGO sector in China: Through the lense of adaptive corporatist governance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1