Board political ideological diversity and information exposure as antecedents to value creation and value appropriation

IF 10.1 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Product Innovation Management Pub Date : 2023-06-14 DOI:10.1111/jpim.12688
Kerry Hudson, Robert E. Morgan
{"title":"Board political ideological diversity and information exposure as antecedents to value creation and value appropriation","authors":"Kerry Hudson,&nbsp;Robert E. Morgan","doi":"10.1111/jpim.12688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Strategic emphasis is a critical decision reflecting a firm's relative proclivity toward value creation versus value appropriation. Despite the increasing role of the board in setting the strategic priorities of firms, there is a dearth of research examining board-level influences on strategic emphasis. Drawing on the cognitive perspective of corporate governance, we posit that exposure to external information via board interlocks provides competing incentives to pursue value creation and value appropriation strategies. We hypothesize that political ideological diversity among directors facilitates the utilization of external information for novel purposes, thus increasing firms' value creation focus. Combining data on directors' political ideologies with network analysis, we test these hypotheses in 584 large U.S. firms between 2000 and 2018. We find that political ideological diversity influences strategic emphasis both directly and in interaction with board interlock network centrality: politically ideological diverse boards exhibit a greater focus on value creation, and this effect is strengthened when the board is well connected to others. These results have implications for the director selection process, and for executives advocating for value creation strategies and the requisite R&amp;D investments under differing conditions of board composition and information exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":16900,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Product Innovation Management","volume":"40 6","pages":"836-858"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Product Innovation Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jpim.12688","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Strategic emphasis is a critical decision reflecting a firm's relative proclivity toward value creation versus value appropriation. Despite the increasing role of the board in setting the strategic priorities of firms, there is a dearth of research examining board-level influences on strategic emphasis. Drawing on the cognitive perspective of corporate governance, we posit that exposure to external information via board interlocks provides competing incentives to pursue value creation and value appropriation strategies. We hypothesize that political ideological diversity among directors facilitates the utilization of external information for novel purposes, thus increasing firms' value creation focus. Combining data on directors' political ideologies with network analysis, we test these hypotheses in 584 large U.S. firms between 2000 and 2018. We find that political ideological diversity influences strategic emphasis both directly and in interaction with board interlock network centrality: politically ideological diverse boards exhibit a greater focus on value creation, and this effect is strengthened when the board is well connected to others. These results have implications for the director selection process, and for executives advocating for value creation strategies and the requisite R&D investments under differing conditions of board composition and information exposure.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
董事会政治意识形态多样性和信息披露是价值创造和价值挪用的前提
战略重点是一个关键的决定,反映了一个公司对价值创造和价值挪用的相对倾向。尽管董事会在制定企业战略重点方面的作用越来越大,但缺乏研究董事会层面对战略重点的影响。从公司治理的认知角度出发,我们假设通过董事会联锁暴露于外部信息提供了追求价值创造和价值分配战略的竞争激励。我们假设,董事之间的政治意识形态多样性有助于将外部信息用于新的目的,从而增加公司的价值创造重点。将董事政治意识形态的数据与网络分析相结合,我们在2000年至2018年间对584家美国大公司的这些假设进行了检验。我们发现,政治意识形态多样性直接影响战略重点,并与董事会连锁网络中心性相互作用:政治意识形态多样的董事会更注重价值创造,当董事会与他人建立良好联系时,这种影响会得到加强。这些结果对董事选拔过程以及倡导价值创造战略和必要的R&;D在不同董事会组成和信息披露条件下的投资。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Product Innovation Management
Journal of Product Innovation Management 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
5.70%
发文量
42
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Product Innovation Management is a leading academic journal focused on research, theory, and practice in innovation and new product development. It covers a broad scope of issues crucial to successful innovation in both external and internal organizational environments. The journal aims to inform, provoke thought, and contribute to the knowledge and practice of new product development and innovation management. It welcomes original articles from organizations of all sizes and domains, including start-ups, small to medium-sized enterprises, and large corporations, as well as from consumer, business-to-business, and policy domains. The journal accepts various quantitative and qualitative methodologies, and authors from diverse disciplines and functional perspectives are encouraged to submit their work.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information Opening thoughts from the new Editors Special issue guest editorial: “Advancing broad and deep understanding in innovation management: Meta-analyses and literature reviews” Top management team attributes and corporate entrepreneurship: A meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1