Management of re-established artificial grasslands via grazing or fencing: Effects on plant and soil properties

Jing Cao, Yiping Chen, Yao Jiang, Jingshu Chen, Junhua Wu
{"title":"Management of re-established artificial grasslands via grazing or fencing: Effects on plant and soil properties","authors":"Jing Cao,&nbsp;Yiping Chen,&nbsp;Yao Jiang,&nbsp;Jingshu Chen,&nbsp;Junhua Wu","doi":"10.1002/glr2.12039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Revegetation is widely used in degraded grassland restoration. However, the responses of grassland plant and soil properties to fencing (FC) and grazing (GZ) remain poorly understood, especially the vegetation–soil coupling coordination (<i>C</i><sub>d</sub>) mechanism. This study explored single and interactive responses of vegetation and soil properties under FC and GZ after revegetation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A field experiment with FC and GZ treatments was conducted in Loess Plateau reconstructed grassland, with degraded grassland as the control (CK). Plant and soil properties and <i>C</i><sub>d</sub> were analyzed using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and principal component analysis (PCA).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The order of soil comprehensive evaluation (SCE) was GZ &gt; FC &gt; CK, while that of vegetation comprehensive evaluation (VCE) was FC &gt; GZ &gt; CK. The <i>C</i><sub>d</sub> of CK was 0.39 (mild imbalance), while the values of FC and GZ were 0.57 and 0.54, respectively (little coordination). The VCE/SCE of FC was 1.48 (soil lag type), and the values of GZ and CK were 0.69 and 0.35, respectively (vegetation lag and vegetation loss type, respectively).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Both GZ and FC improved <i>C</i><sub>d</sub> and facilitated recovery. However, degraded grasslands should be restored via moderate grazing for sustainable ecological and economic development.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100593,"journal":{"name":"Grassland Research","volume":"2 1","pages":"69-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/glr2.12039","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Grassland Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/glr2.12039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Revegetation is widely used in degraded grassland restoration. However, the responses of grassland plant and soil properties to fencing (FC) and grazing (GZ) remain poorly understood, especially the vegetation–soil coupling coordination (Cd) mechanism. This study explored single and interactive responses of vegetation and soil properties under FC and GZ after revegetation.

Methods

A field experiment with FC and GZ treatments was conducted in Loess Plateau reconstructed grassland, with degraded grassland as the control (CK). Plant and soil properties and Cd were analyzed using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and principal component analysis (PCA).

Results

The order of soil comprehensive evaluation (SCE) was GZ > FC > CK, while that of vegetation comprehensive evaluation (VCE) was FC > GZ > CK. The Cd of CK was 0.39 (mild imbalance), while the values of FC and GZ were 0.57 and 0.54, respectively (little coordination). The VCE/SCE of FC was 1.48 (soil lag type), and the values of GZ and CK were 0.69 and 0.35, respectively (vegetation lag and vegetation loss type, respectively).

Conclusions

Both GZ and FC improved Cd and facilitated recovery. However, degraded grasslands should be restored via moderate grazing for sustainable ecological and economic development.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过放牧或围栏管理重建的人工草地:对植物和土壤特性的影响
背景植被恢复在退化草地恢复中有着广泛的应用。然而,对草地植物和土壤特性对围栏(FC)和放牧(GZ)的反应,特别是植被-土壤耦合协调(Cd)机制,仍知之甚少。本研究探讨了植被恢复后FC和GZ对植被和土壤性质的单一和交互响应。方法以退化草地为对照,在黄土高原重建草地上进行FC和GZ处理的田间试验。采用层次分析法(AHP)和主成分分析法(PCA)对植物和土壤性质以及Cd进行了分析。结果土壤综合评价(SCE)排序为GZ >; FC >; CK,植被综合评价(VCE)为FC >; GZ >; CK的Cd为0.39(轻度不平衡),而FC和GZ的值分别为0.57和0.54(少量配位)。FC的VCE/SCE为1.48(土壤滞后型),GZ和CK的值分别为0.69和0.35(植被滞后型和植被损失型)。结论GZ和FC均能提高Cd含量,促进Cd的回收。然而,退化的草原应该通过适度放牧来恢复,以实现可持续的生态和经济发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Forage yield and nutritive value of plantain and chicory for livestock feed at high altitudes in Peru Our world is changing Biocontrol agents enhance plant disease resistance by altering plant microbiomes Effect of fermented total mixed rations on rumen microbial communities and serum metabolites in lambs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1