Assessing risk for butterflies in the context of climate change, demographic uncertainty, and heterogeneous data sources

IF 7.1 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecological Monographs Pub Date : 2023-05-19 DOI:10.1002/ecm.1584
Matthew L. Forister, Eliza M. Grames, Christopher A. Halsch, Kevin J. Burls, Cas F. Carroll, Katherine L. Bell, Joshua P. Jahner, Taylor A. Bradford, Jing Zhang, Qian Cong, Nick V. Grishin, Jeffrey Glassberg, Arthur M. Shapiro, Thomas V. Riecke
{"title":"Assessing risk for butterflies in the context of climate change, demographic uncertainty, and heterogeneous data sources","authors":"Matthew L. Forister,&nbsp;Eliza M. Grames,&nbsp;Christopher A. Halsch,&nbsp;Kevin J. Burls,&nbsp;Cas F. Carroll,&nbsp;Katherine L. Bell,&nbsp;Joshua P. Jahner,&nbsp;Taylor A. Bradford,&nbsp;Jing Zhang,&nbsp;Qian Cong,&nbsp;Nick V. Grishin,&nbsp;Jeffrey Glassberg,&nbsp;Arthur M. Shapiro,&nbsp;Thomas V. Riecke","doi":"10.1002/ecm.1584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ongoing declines in insect populations have led to substantial concern and calls for conservation action. However, even for relatively well studied groups, like butterflies, information relevant to species-specific status and risk is scattered across field guides, the scientific literature, and agency reports. Consequently, attention and resources have been spent on a minuscule fraction of insect diversity, including a few well studied butterflies. Here we bring together heterogeneous sources of information for 396 butterfly species to provide the first regional assessment of butterflies for the 11 western US states. For 184 species, we use monitoring data to characterize historical and projected trends in population abundance. For another 212 species (for which monitoring data are not available, but other types of information can be collected), we use exposure to climate change, development, geographic range, number of host plants, and other factors to rank species for conservation concern. A phylogenetic signal is apparent, with concentrations of declining and at-risk species in the families Lycaenidae and Hesperiidae. A geographic bias exists in that many species that lack monitoring data occur in the more southern states where we expect that impacts of warming and drying trends will be most severe. Legal protection is rare among the taxa with the highest risk values: of the top 100 species, one is listed as threatened under the US Endangered Species Act and one is a candidate for listing. Among the many taxa not currently protected, we highlight a short list of species in decline, including <i>Vanessa annabella</i>, <i>Thorybes mexicanus</i>, <i>Euchloe ausonides</i>, and <i>Pholisora catullus</i>. Notably, many of these species have broad geographic ranges, which perhaps highlights a new era of insect conservation in which small or fragmented ranges will not be the only red flags that attract conservation attention.</p>","PeriodicalId":11505,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Monographs","volume":"93 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Monographs","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecm.1584","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ongoing declines in insect populations have led to substantial concern and calls for conservation action. However, even for relatively well studied groups, like butterflies, information relevant to species-specific status and risk is scattered across field guides, the scientific literature, and agency reports. Consequently, attention and resources have been spent on a minuscule fraction of insect diversity, including a few well studied butterflies. Here we bring together heterogeneous sources of information for 396 butterfly species to provide the first regional assessment of butterflies for the 11 western US states. For 184 species, we use monitoring data to characterize historical and projected trends in population abundance. For another 212 species (for which monitoring data are not available, but other types of information can be collected), we use exposure to climate change, development, geographic range, number of host plants, and other factors to rank species for conservation concern. A phylogenetic signal is apparent, with concentrations of declining and at-risk species in the families Lycaenidae and Hesperiidae. A geographic bias exists in that many species that lack monitoring data occur in the more southern states where we expect that impacts of warming and drying trends will be most severe. Legal protection is rare among the taxa with the highest risk values: of the top 100 species, one is listed as threatened under the US Endangered Species Act and one is a candidate for listing. Among the many taxa not currently protected, we highlight a short list of species in decline, including Vanessa annabella, Thorybes mexicanus, Euchloe ausonides, and Pholisora catullus. Notably, many of these species have broad geographic ranges, which perhaps highlights a new era of insect conservation in which small or fragmented ranges will not be the only red flags that attract conservation attention.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在气候变化、人口不确定性和异质数据来源的背景下评估蝴蝶的风险
昆虫数量的持续下降引起了人们的极大关注,并呼吁采取保护行动。然而,即使对于蝴蝶等研究相对完善的群体,与物种特定状态和风险相关的信息也分散在实地指南、科学文献和机构报告中。因此,人们的注意力和资源都花在了昆虫多样性的一小部分上,包括一些经过充分研究的蝴蝶。在这里,我们汇集了396种蝴蝶的异质信息来源,为美国西部11个州的蝴蝶提供了首次区域评估。对于184个物种,我们使用监测数据来描述种群丰度的历史和预测趋势。对于另外212个物种(无法获得监测数据,但可以收集其他类型的信息),我们利用气候变化、发育、地理范围、寄主植物数量和其他因素对物种进行保护排名。系统发育信号是明显的,石首鱼科和灰蝶科的物种数量减少,风险较高。地理上存在偏见,因为许多缺乏监测数据的物种出现在更南部的州,我们预计那里的变暖和干旱趋势的影响将最为严重。在风险值最高的分类群中,法律保护是罕见的:在前100个物种中,一个根据《美国濒危物种法》被列为受威胁物种,一个是候选物种。在目前未受保护的许多分类群中,我们重点介绍了一个正在减少的物种的短名单,包括Vanessa annabella、Thorybes mexicanus、Euchloe ausonides和Pholisora catullus。值得注意的是,这些物种中的许多具有广阔的地理范围,这可能突显了昆虫保护的新时代,在这个时代,小范围或分散的范围将不是吸引保护关注的唯一危险信号。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Monographs
Ecological Monographs 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The vision for Ecological Monographs is that it should be the place for publishing integrative, synthetic papers that elaborate new directions for the field of ecology. Original Research Papers published in Ecological Monographs will continue to document complex observational, experimental, or theoretical studies that by their very integrated nature defy dissolution into shorter publications focused on a single topic or message. Reviews will be comprehensive and synthetic papers that establish new benchmarks in the field, define directions for future research, contribute to fundamental understanding of ecological principles, and derive principles for ecological management in its broadest sense (including, but not limited to: conservation, mitigation, restoration, and pro-active protection of the environment). Reviews should reflect the full development of a topic and encompass relevant natural history, observational and experimental data, analyses, models, and theory. Reviews published in Ecological Monographs should further blur the boundaries between “basic” and “applied” ecology. Concepts and Synthesis papers will conceptually advance the field of ecology. These papers are expected to go well beyond works being reviewed and include discussion of new directions, new syntheses, and resolutions of old questions. In this world of rapid scientific advancement and never-ending environmental change, there needs to be room for the thoughtful integration of scientific ideas, data, and concepts that feeds the mind and guides the development of the maturing science of ecology. Ecological Monographs provides that room, with an expansive view to a sustainable future.
期刊最新文献
Cover Image Issue Information Understanding the chemodiversity of plants: Quantification, variation and ecological function Habitat area more consistently affects seagrass faunal communities than fragmentation per se Comparing the differing effects of host species richness on metrics of disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1