Bycatch reduction devices exclude diamondback terrapins and maintain blue crab catch in two Virginia tidal creeks

IF 1.8 3区 农林科学 Q2 FISHERIES Marine and Coastal Fisheries Pub Date : 2023-10-20 DOI:10.1002/mcf2.10263
Madeline B. Reinsel, Michael A. Gibson, Natalie M. Klesch, Randolph M. Chambers
{"title":"Bycatch reduction devices exclude diamondback terrapins and maintain blue crab catch in two Virginia tidal creeks","authors":"Madeline B. Reinsel,&nbsp;Michael A. Gibson,&nbsp;Natalie M. Klesch,&nbsp;Randolph M. Chambers","doi":"10.1002/mcf2.10263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>The diamondback terrapin <i>Malaclemys terrapin</i> is frequently caught as bycatch in both commercial and recreational blue crab <i>Callinectes sapidus</i> fisheries throughout its range along the Atlantic and Gulf coasts of North America. Bycatch reduction devices (BRDs) are plastic or wire rectangles mounted in the entrance funnels of crab traps, designed to exclude terrapins while still allowing crabs to enter. In this study conducted in two tidal creeks in Virginia, USA, we assessed the effectiveness of four BRD designs, including two novel oval designs, against control traps with no BRDs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We tested four replicates of each of the five trap treatments (1.75-inch oval BRD, 2-inch oval BRD, 1.75-inch rectangular BRD, 2-inch rectangular BRD, and a control trap without a BRD) in each tidal creek, for a total of 20 traps per creek and 40 traps total. We fitted traps with wire chimneys that extended above the high tide water line to allow trapped terrapins to surface for air. For eight weeks during summer 2021, we baited traps with Atlantic Menhaden <i>Brevoortia tyrannus</i> each day, beginning on Monday. Tuesday–Friday, we emptied traps of any animals inside, and recorded terrapin sex, terrapin carapace length, terrapin carapace width, and terrapin shell height, as well as blue crab carapace length.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Result</h3>\n \n <p>We found that all four BRD designs were highly effective at excluding terrapins and maintaining crab catch when compared to control traps. We found a significant difference (<i>p</i> = 0.003) in catch per unit effort (CPUE) of diamondback terrapins among treatments, with the control group (those without BRDs) having the highest CPUE (0.97 ± 0.18). All traps fitted with BRDs decreased terrapin capture significantly compared to the control group. Oval BRDs excluded more terrapins than their rectangular counterparts with the same height dimension, although these differences were not significant. We found no significant difference in CPUE of blue crabs among treatments (<i>p</i> = 0.392), or in the size of legal crabs caught in each treatment (<i>p</i> = 0.216).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study provides evidence of the effectiveness of both rectangular and oval-shaped BRDs to exclude terrapins and maintain crab catch in Virginia waters, where BRDs are not currently required.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51257,"journal":{"name":"Marine and Coastal Fisheries","volume":"15 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mcf2.10263","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine and Coastal Fisheries","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mcf2.10263","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The diamondback terrapin Malaclemys terrapin is frequently caught as bycatch in both commercial and recreational blue crab Callinectes sapidus fisheries throughout its range along the Atlantic and Gulf coasts of North America. Bycatch reduction devices (BRDs) are plastic or wire rectangles mounted in the entrance funnels of crab traps, designed to exclude terrapins while still allowing crabs to enter. In this study conducted in two tidal creeks in Virginia, USA, we assessed the effectiveness of four BRD designs, including two novel oval designs, against control traps with no BRDs.

Methods

We tested four replicates of each of the five trap treatments (1.75-inch oval BRD, 2-inch oval BRD, 1.75-inch rectangular BRD, 2-inch rectangular BRD, and a control trap without a BRD) in each tidal creek, for a total of 20 traps per creek and 40 traps total. We fitted traps with wire chimneys that extended above the high tide water line to allow trapped terrapins to surface for air. For eight weeks during summer 2021, we baited traps with Atlantic Menhaden Brevoortia tyrannus each day, beginning on Monday. Tuesday–Friday, we emptied traps of any animals inside, and recorded terrapin sex, terrapin carapace length, terrapin carapace width, and terrapin shell height, as well as blue crab carapace length.

Result

We found that all four BRD designs were highly effective at excluding terrapins and maintaining crab catch when compared to control traps. We found a significant difference (p = 0.003) in catch per unit effort (CPUE) of diamondback terrapins among treatments, with the control group (those without BRDs) having the highest CPUE (0.97 ± 0.18). All traps fitted with BRDs decreased terrapin capture significantly compared to the control group. Oval BRDs excluded more terrapins than their rectangular counterparts with the same height dimension, although these differences were not significant. We found no significant difference in CPUE of blue crabs among treatments (p = 0.392), or in the size of legal crabs caught in each treatment (p = 0.216).

Conclusion

This study provides evidence of the effectiveness of both rectangular and oval-shaped BRDs to exclude terrapins and maintain crab catch in Virginia waters, where BRDs are not currently required.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
减少副渔获物的装置排除了响尾蛇,并保持了弗吉尼亚州两条潮汐小溪中的蓝蟹捕获量
目的在北美洲大西洋和墨西哥湾沿岸的商业和休闲蓝蟹捕捞活动中,响尾蛇经常作为副渔获物被捕获。副渔获物减少装置(BRD)是安装在捕蟹器入口漏斗中的塑料或金属丝矩形,旨在排除水龟,同时仍允许螃蟹进入。在这项在美国弗吉尼亚州的两条潮汐小溪中进行的研究中,我们评估了四种BRD设计的有效性,其中包括两种新的椭圆形设计,以对抗没有BRD的控制陷阱。方法我们在每条潮汐小溪中测试了五种诱捕器处理(1.75英寸椭圆形BRD、2英寸椭圆形BRD.、1.75英寸矩形BRD.、2英寸矩形BRD和没有BRD.的对照诱捕器)中的每一种的四个重复,每条小溪总共有20个诱捕器,总共有40个诱捕器。我们安装了带有金属烟囱的陷阱,这些烟囱延伸到高潮水位线上方,让被困的水龟浮出水面呼吸空气。在2021年夏天的八个星期里,我们从周一开始,每天都用大西洋鲱鱼引诱陷阱。星期二至星期五,我们清空了里面所有动物的陷阱,并记录了水龟的性别、龟甲长度、龟甲宽度、龟甲高度以及蓝蟹甲长度。结果我们发现,与对照诱捕器相比,所有四种BRD设计在排除水龟和保持螃蟹捕获方面都非常有效。我们发现 = 在处理中,响尾蛇的单位努力捕获量(CPUE)为0.003,而对照组(没有BRD的组)的CPUE最高(0.97 ± 0.18)。与对照组相比,所有装有BRD的诱捕器都显著减少了水龟的捕获。椭圆形BRD比具有相同高度尺寸的矩形BRD排除了更多的Terrapin,尽管这些差异并不显著。我们发现不同处理间蓝蟹的CPUE没有显著差异(p = 0.392),或每种处理中捕获的合法螃蟹的大小(p = 0.216)。结论本研究提供了矩形和椭圆形BRD在弗吉尼亚水域排除水龟和保持螃蟹捕获量的有效性的证据,而弗吉尼亚水域目前不需要BRD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Marine and Coastal Fisheries
Marine and Coastal Fisheries FISHERIES-MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Marine and Coastal Fisheries: Dynamics, Management, and Ecosystem Science publishes original and innovative research that synthesizes information on biological organization across spatial and temporal scales to promote ecologically sound fisheries science and management. This open-access, online journal published by the American Fisheries Society provides an international venue for studies of marine, coastal, and estuarine fisheries, with emphasis on species'' performance and responses to perturbations in their environment, and promotes the development of ecosystem-based fisheries science and management.
期刊最新文献
Spatial distributions of Jonah and Atlantic rock crabs in the Georges Bank and Mid-Atlantic Bight regions during 1968–2021 Shifting spawning phenology in Hudson River American Shad Erratum Evaluating the conservation benefit of circle hooks for the Atlantic Striped Bass recreational fishery Analysis of fishing intensity in the South China Sea based on automatic identification system data: A comparison between China and Vietnam
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1