How do different functional crop groups perform in temperate silvoarable agroforestry systems? A Swiss case study

Christina den Hond-Vaccaro, Johan Six, Christian Schöb
{"title":"How do different functional crop groups perform in temperate silvoarable agroforestry systems? A Swiss case study","authors":"Christina den Hond-Vaccaro,&nbsp;Johan Six,&nbsp;Christian Schöb","doi":"10.1002/sae2.12047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Agroforestry systems provide a number of ecosystem services and are frequently considered as a promising diversification strategy for more sustainable and climate resilient primary production. However, most agroforestry field trials compare only one crop type with a control in open field. Additional comparisons between treatments that influence nutrient and water availability are often not looked at, nor are comparisons between crop species.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>To deepen our understanding of the ecological processes underlying the potential benefits of agroforestry for food production, the present experimental study addresses three environmental factors (shade, fertilisation and irrigation) on three functionally different crop species (field bean, summer barley, summer rapeseed) and a C<sub>4</sub>-grass (<i>Echinochloa crus-galli</i>) in a Swiss agroforestry system. Crop performance (physiological traits, yield) between functional groups was analysed among treatment combinations of shade, fertilisation and irrigation. Physiological traits included measurements of chlorophyll content, stomatal conductance, specific leaf area and plant height.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Summer barley and field bean showed significant yield declines when shaded (−44% and −38%, respectively), similar to summer rapeseed with a significant biomass decline (−35%). Shade significantly increased the occurrence of lodging in barley. Rapeseed in particular performed better when fertilised (+40% biomass).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The results allow to estimate the range of potential yield losses in the competitive zone near mature trees for functionally different crop groups. The findings serve as a decision-support for species selection in temperate European agroforestry systems.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100834,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/sae2.12047","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sae2.12047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Agroforestry systems provide a number of ecosystem services and are frequently considered as a promising diversification strategy for more sustainable and climate resilient primary production. However, most agroforestry field trials compare only one crop type with a control in open field. Additional comparisons between treatments that influence nutrient and water availability are often not looked at, nor are comparisons between crop species.

Materials and Methods

To deepen our understanding of the ecological processes underlying the potential benefits of agroforestry for food production, the present experimental study addresses three environmental factors (shade, fertilisation and irrigation) on three functionally different crop species (field bean, summer barley, summer rapeseed) and a C4-grass (Echinochloa crus-galli) in a Swiss agroforestry system. Crop performance (physiological traits, yield) between functional groups was analysed among treatment combinations of shade, fertilisation and irrigation. Physiological traits included measurements of chlorophyll content, stomatal conductance, specific leaf area and plant height.

Results

Summer barley and field bean showed significant yield declines when shaded (−44% and −38%, respectively), similar to summer rapeseed with a significant biomass decline (−35%). Shade significantly increased the occurrence of lodging in barley. Rapeseed in particular performed better when fertilised (+40% biomass).

Conclusion

The results allow to estimate the range of potential yield losses in the competitive zone near mature trees for functionally different crop groups. The findings serve as a decision-support for species selection in temperate European agroforestry systems.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同功能作物群体在温带可造林农林系统中的表现如何?瑞士案例研究
引言农林系统提供了许多生态系统服务,经常被认为是一种有前景的多样化战略,用于更可持续和更具气候适应性的初级生产。然而,大多数农林业田间试验仅将一种作物类型与露地对照进行比较。影响养分和水分可用性的处理之间的额外比较通常没有被考虑,作物物种之间的比较也没有被考虑。材料和方法为了加深我们对农林业对粮食生产潜在效益背后的生态过程的理解,本实验研究解决了瑞士农林系统中三种功能不同的作物(蚕豆、夏大麦、夏油菜)和一种C4草(Echinochloa crus galli)的三个环境因素(遮荫、施肥和灌溉)。在遮荫、施肥和灌溉的处理组合中,分析了功能组之间的作物表现(生理特征、产量)。生理性状包括叶绿素含量、气孔导度、比叶面积和株高的测定。结果夏大麦和蚕豆在遮荫时产量显著下降(分别为−44%和−38%),与夏油菜生物量显著下降(−35%)相似。遮荫显著增加了大麦倒伏的发生。尤其是油菜在施肥时表现更好(生物量增加40%)。结论该结果可以估计功能不同作物组在成熟树附近竞争区的潜在产量损失范围。这些发现为欧洲温带农林系统的物种选择提供了决策支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Influence of climate on soil viral communities in Australia on a regional scale Biodegradable plastic film mulch increases the mineralisation of organic amendments and prevents nitrate leaching during the growing season in organic vegetable production Pretreatment and fermentation of lignocellulose from oil palm fronds as a potential source of fibre for ruminant feed: a review Psyllium husk mucilage as a novel seed encapsulant for agriculture and reforestation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1