Algorithms propagate gender bias in the marketplace—with consumers’ cooperation

IF 4 2区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS Journal of Consumer Psychology Pub Date : 2023-04-12 DOI:10.1002/jcpy.1351
Shelly Rathee, Sachin Banker, Arul Mishra, Himanshu Mishra
{"title":"Algorithms propagate gender bias in the marketplace—with consumers’ cooperation","authors":"Shelly Rathee,&nbsp;Sachin Banker,&nbsp;Arul Mishra,&nbsp;Himanshu Mishra","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Recent research shows that algorithms learn societal biases from large text corpora. We examine the marketplace-relevant consequences of such bias for consumers. Based on billions of documents from online text corpora, we first demonstrate that from gender biases embedded in language, algorithms learn to associate women with more negative consumer psychographic attributes than men (e.g., associating women more closely with <i>impulsive</i> vs. <i>planned</i> investors). Second, in a series of field experiments, we show that such learning results in the delivery of gender-biased digital advertisements and product recommendations. Specifically, across multiple platforms, products, and attributes, we find that digital advertisements containing negative psychographic attributes (e.g., impulsive) are more likely to be delivered to women compared to men, and that search engine product recommendations are similarly biased, which influences consumer's consideration sets and choice. Finally, we empirically examine consumer's role in co-producing algorithmic gender bias in the marketplace and observe that consumers reinforce these biases by accepting gender stereotypes (i.e., clicking on biased ads). We conclude by discussing theoretical and practical implications.</p>","PeriodicalId":48365,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","volume":"33 4","pages":"621-631"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcpy.1351","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Recent research shows that algorithms learn societal biases from large text corpora. We examine the marketplace-relevant consequences of such bias for consumers. Based on billions of documents from online text corpora, we first demonstrate that from gender biases embedded in language, algorithms learn to associate women with more negative consumer psychographic attributes than men (e.g., associating women more closely with impulsive vs. planned investors). Second, in a series of field experiments, we show that such learning results in the delivery of gender-biased digital advertisements and product recommendations. Specifically, across multiple platforms, products, and attributes, we find that digital advertisements containing negative psychographic attributes (e.g., impulsive) are more likely to be delivered to women compared to men, and that search engine product recommendations are similarly biased, which influences consumer's consideration sets and choice. Finally, we empirically examine consumer's role in co-producing algorithmic gender bias in the marketplace and observe that consumers reinforce these biases by accepting gender stereotypes (i.e., clicking on biased ads). We conclude by discussing theoretical and practical implications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
算法在市场上传播性别偏见——与消费者合作
最近的研究表明,算法从大型文本语料库中学习社会偏见。我们研究了这种偏见对消费者的市场相关后果。基于来自在线文本语料库的数十亿份文件,我们首先证明,从语言中嵌入的性别偏见来看,算法学会将女性与比男性更负面的消费者心理特征联系在一起(例如,将女性与冲动投资者和计划投资者联系得更紧密)。其次,在一系列实地实验中,我们表明,这种学习会导致提供带有性别偏见的数字广告和产品推荐。具体而言,在多个平台、产品和属性中,我们发现,与男性相比,包含负面心理属性(如冲动)的数字广告更有可能传递给女性,搜索引擎的产品推荐也有类似的偏见,这会影响消费者的考虑因素和选择。最后,我们实证研究了消费者在市场中共同产生算法性别偏见中的作用,并观察到消费者通过接受性别刻板印象(即点击有偏见的广告)来强化这些偏见。最后,我们讨论了理论和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
14.60%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: The Journal of Consumer Psychology is devoted to psychological perspectives on the study of the consumer. It publishes articles that contribute both theoretically and empirically to an understanding of psychological processes underlying consumers thoughts, feelings, decisions, and behaviors. Areas of emphasis include, but are not limited to, consumer judgment and decision processes, attitude formation and change, reactions to persuasive communications, affective experiences, consumer information processing, consumer-brand relationships, affective, cognitive, and motivational determinants of consumer behavior, family and group decision processes, and cultural and individual differences in consumer behavior.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Refining and expanding applications of Moral Foundations Theory in consumer psychology Message framing to enhance consumer compliance with disease detection communication for prevention: The moderating role of age AI‐induced dehumanization The model‐sizing dilemma: The use of varied female model sizes helps the impressions of brand values but hurts shopping ease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1