What does America think about the Senkaku Islands? An analysis of US think tank policy and strategy positions

IF 1 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Asian Politics & Policy Pub Date : 2023-07-20 DOI:10.1111/aspp.12706
Mio Ando
{"title":"What does America think about the Senkaku Islands? An analysis of US think tank policy and strategy positions","authors":"Mio Ando","doi":"10.1111/aspp.12706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study conducts the first systematic review of major United States (US) think tank policy and strategy positions regarding defense of the Senkaku Islands. An analytical framework for content analysis is created and then applied to 76 documents spanning the 2010–2020 period. The policy orientations of 10 leading think tanks are identified, as is the strategic rationale behind their arguments. Because think tanks in the US exert tremendous influence on policymaking, the thick description conducted in this study can shed a great deal of light not only on the past but also the future scope of potential US policy options in the East China Sea.</p>","PeriodicalId":44747,"journal":{"name":"Asian Politics & Policy","volume":"15 3","pages":"496-519"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Politics & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aspp.12706","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study conducts the first systematic review of major United States (US) think tank policy and strategy positions regarding defense of the Senkaku Islands. An analytical framework for content analysis is created and then applied to 76 documents spanning the 2010–2020 period. The policy orientations of 10 leading think tanks are identified, as is the strategic rationale behind their arguments. Because think tanks in the US exert tremendous influence on policymaking, the thick description conducted in this study can shed a great deal of light not only on the past but also the future scope of potential US policy options in the East China Sea.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国对尖阁诸岛有何看法?美国智库政策与战略立场分析
本研究首次系统回顾了美国主要智库在尖阁诸岛防御方面的政策和战略立场。创建了内容分析的分析框架,然后将其应用于2010-2020年期间的76份文档。确定了10家领先智库的政策方向,以及它们论点背后的战略依据。由于美国的智库对政策制定有着巨大的影响,本研究中进行的详尽描述不仅可以揭示美国在东海潜在政策选择的过去,而且可以揭示美国未来的范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Politics & Policy
Asian Politics & Policy POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Same goal, different measures: Obscure transformation in Japan's food security policy (1970–2020) The year of democracy's consequential elections The multiple patterns of factional influence: Evidence from the 2021 LDP presidential election The impact of social and institutional trust on South Korean perceptions of North Korean arrivals 社会和制度信任对韩国人的朝鲜移民感知的影响 El impacto de la confianza social e institucional en las percepciones de los surcoreanos sobre la llegaada de norcoreanos
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1