Fostering resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic via a digital mental health intervention—A pilot study

Jennifer K. Kulke, Barbara Nacke, Corinna Jacobi
{"title":"Fostering resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic via a digital mental health intervention—A pilot study","authors":"Jennifer K. Kulke,&nbsp;Barbara Nacke,&nbsp;Corinna Jacobi","doi":"10.1002/mhs2.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, mental health burden of university members sharply increased. Specific interventions to address pandemic-related psychological distress did not yet exist. Current studies show that digital interventions reduce this burden, the investigation of changes in resilience as an outcome is lacking in these studies though. We therefore developed and evaluated the internet- and mobile-based intervention “bounce” to foster resilience, reduce perceived stress, and psychological symptom burden among university members during the pandemic. The 8-week, unguided internet- and mobile-based intervention consists of one mandatory module promoting resilience and six optional modules on pandemic-related topics. The study was designed as a one-arm, longitudinal pilot study with a baseline and postintervention assessment and self-reported resilience, perceived stress, and psychological symptom burden as outcome measures. The use and acceptance of the intervention modules were recorded and analyzed. A total of 798 individuals were given access to the intervention (<i>n</i> = 70 employees, <i>n</i> = 728 students, <i>M</i> = 26.05 years, 71.8% women). Of these, 273 participants (34%) completed the postassessment. On average, participants logged on to the intervention platform four times and completed an average of 1.90 (SD = 1.64) modules. The intervention as a whole and all modules were well accepted by participants. Intention-to-treat analyses showed a significant increase in resilience (<i>t</i> = −4.69, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, <i>d</i> = 0.23) and a significant reduction in perceived stress (<i>t</i> = 6.50, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, <i>d</i> = 0.32), and psychological symptom burden (<i>t</i> = 3.59, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, <i>d</i> = 0.18) from baseline to postintervention. This study demonstrates that digital interventions can be easily developed and used as means to reduce mental health burden in large populations during a pandemic. The need for randomized controlled trials with follow-up assessments to examine longer-term effects and revisions of the intervention to increase effectiveness and use are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":94140,"journal":{"name":"Mental health science","volume":"1 3","pages":"147-156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mhs2.27","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental health science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mhs2.27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, mental health burden of university members sharply increased. Specific interventions to address pandemic-related psychological distress did not yet exist. Current studies show that digital interventions reduce this burden, the investigation of changes in resilience as an outcome is lacking in these studies though. We therefore developed and evaluated the internet- and mobile-based intervention “bounce” to foster resilience, reduce perceived stress, and psychological symptom burden among university members during the pandemic. The 8-week, unguided internet- and mobile-based intervention consists of one mandatory module promoting resilience and six optional modules on pandemic-related topics. The study was designed as a one-arm, longitudinal pilot study with a baseline and postintervention assessment and self-reported resilience, perceived stress, and psychological symptom burden as outcome measures. The use and acceptance of the intervention modules were recorded and analyzed. A total of 798 individuals were given access to the intervention (n = 70 employees, n = 728 students, M = 26.05 years, 71.8% women). Of these, 273 participants (34%) completed the postassessment. On average, participants logged on to the intervention platform four times and completed an average of 1.90 (SD = 1.64) modules. The intervention as a whole and all modules were well accepted by participants. Intention-to-treat analyses showed a significant increase in resilience (t = −4.69, p < 0.001, d = 0.23) and a significant reduction in perceived stress (t = 6.50, p < 0.001, d = 0.32), and psychological symptom burden (t = 3.59, p < 0.001, d = 0.18) from baseline to postintervention. This study demonstrates that digital interventions can be easily developed and used as means to reduce mental health burden in large populations during a pandemic. The need for randomized controlled trials with follow-up assessments to examine longer-term effects and revisions of the intervention to increase effectiveness and use are discussed.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过数字心理健康干预培养新冠肺炎大流行期间的复原力——一项试点研究
在2019冠状病毒病(新冠肺炎)大流行期间,大学成员的心理健康负担急剧增加。目前还不存在解决与疫情相关的心理困扰的具体干预措施。目前的研究表明,数字干预可以减轻这一负担,但这些研究缺乏对恢复力变化的调查。因此,我们开发并评估了基于互联网和移动的干预“反弹”,以在疫情期间培养韧性,减少大学成员的感知压力和心理症状负担。为期8周的无指导互联网和移动干预包括一个促进恢复力的强制性模块和六个关于疫情相关主题的可选模块。该研究被设计为一项单臂纵向试点研究,以基线和干预后评估以及自我报告的恢复力、感知压力和心理症状负担作为结果衡量标准。记录并分析干预模块的使用和验收情况。共有798人接受了干预(n = 70名员工,n = 728名学生,M = 26.05岁,女性71.8%)。其中,273名参与者(34%)完成了后评估。参与者平均登录干预平台四次,平均完成1.90(SD = 1.64)模块。整个干预措施和所有模块都得到了与会者的认可。意向治疗分析显示,复原力显著增加(t = −4.69,p <; 0.001,d = 0.23)和感知压力的显著降低(t = 6.50,p <; 0.001,d = 0.32)和心理症状负担(t = 3.59,p <; 0.001,d = 0.18)。这项研究表明,在大流行期间,数字干预可以很容易地开发和使用,作为减轻大量人群心理健康负担的手段。讨论了随机对照试验和随访评估的必要性,以检查长期效果,并对干预措施进行了修订,以提高有效性和使用率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information The simultaneous impact of interventions on optimism and depression: A meta-analysis Social sharing and expressive suppression in major depressive disorder and borderline personality disorder: An experience sampling study Predictors of preoperative anxiety in pediatric surgical patients in Ghana: A bi-center study Using passive and active data to predict posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms and cannabis use in recently discharged UK veterans: A protocol for the MAVERICK feasibility study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1