Challenges and barriers faced by older adults to access legislative e-participation platforms in Brazil

IF 1.1 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries Pub Date : 2023-05-22 DOI:10.1002/isd2.12274
Luiza Junqueira, André P. Freire, André Grützmann, Emilene Zitkus
{"title":"Challenges and barriers faced by older adults to access legislative e-participation platforms in Brazil","authors":"Luiza Junqueira,&nbsp;André P. Freire,&nbsp;André Grützmann,&nbsp;Emilene Zitkus","doi":"10.1002/isd2.12274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>With the steady increase of the aging population in Brazil, older adults demand government services and actions more than ever. The present exploratory study analyzed the challenges and barriers faced by older adults when accessing legislative e-participation platforms, considering whether the challenges would interfere with these citizens' empowerment. The study employed qualitative evaluations with 20 participants over 60 years old on the e-Cidadania and e-Democracia platforms. It involved responding to a questionnaire, using the platform—while usability tests and observation were conducted—and a post-test interview. The results showed that, in general, the participants were interested in contributing to the e-participation platforms and considered that these systems provide representativeness to them. However, the negative aspects of the design contribute to skepticism among older adults, which can demotivate them to use the resources. The results highlight how the interface features reinforce participants' distrust in the government and distrust in the e-participation process as soon as they realize the information and language are complicated and the resource is difficult to use. They stressed that a more accessible language and a simplified organization of web pages could facilitate the use and boost older people's engagement with these platforms. The results provide reflections on the design of e-participation systems and processes to promote real political participation of older adults in society. Although the study is not representative of the Brazilian older adult population, the qualitative findings and recommendations were delivered to the Accessibility commission of the Brazilian Chamber of Deputies and have been used for guidance and improvements in the platforms.</p>","PeriodicalId":46610,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/isd2.12274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

With the steady increase of the aging population in Brazil, older adults demand government services and actions more than ever. The present exploratory study analyzed the challenges and barriers faced by older adults when accessing legislative e-participation platforms, considering whether the challenges would interfere with these citizens' empowerment. The study employed qualitative evaluations with 20 participants over 60 years old on the e-Cidadania and e-Democracia platforms. It involved responding to a questionnaire, using the platform—while usability tests and observation were conducted—and a post-test interview. The results showed that, in general, the participants were interested in contributing to the e-participation platforms and considered that these systems provide representativeness to them. However, the negative aspects of the design contribute to skepticism among older adults, which can demotivate them to use the resources. The results highlight how the interface features reinforce participants' distrust in the government and distrust in the e-participation process as soon as they realize the information and language are complicated and the resource is difficult to use. They stressed that a more accessible language and a simplified organization of web pages could facilitate the use and boost older people's engagement with these platforms. The results provide reflections on the design of e-participation systems and processes to promote real political participation of older adults in society. Although the study is not representative of the Brazilian older adult population, the qualitative findings and recommendations were delivered to the Accessibility commission of the Brazilian Chamber of Deputies and have been used for guidance and improvements in the platforms.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西老年人在使用立法电子参与平台方面面临的挑战和障碍
随着巴西老龄化人口的稳步增加,老年人比以往任何时候都更需要政府的服务和行动。本探索性研究分析了老年人在访问立法电子参与平台时面临的挑战和障碍,考虑这些挑战是否会干扰这些公民的赋权。该研究对20名60岁以上的参与者进行了定性评估 在e-Cidadania和e-Democracia平台上已有多年历史。它包括回答问卷,使用该平台——同时进行可用性测试和观察——以及测试后的采访。结果显示,总体而言,参与者有兴趣为电子参与平台做出贡献,并认为这些系统为他们提供了代表性。然而,设计的消极方面导致了老年人的怀疑,这可能会削弱他们使用资源的动力。研究结果强调,当参与者意识到信息和语言复杂且资源难以使用时,界面特征如何增强他们对政府的不信任和对电子参与过程的不信任。他们强调,更易于访问的语言和简化的网页组织可以促进这些平台的使用,并促进老年人对这些平台的参与。研究结果对电子参与系统和流程的设计进行了思考,以促进老年人真正参与社会政治。尽管这项研究不能代表巴西老年人,但定性调查结果和建议已提交给巴西众议院无障碍委员会,并用于指导和改进平台。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
15.40%
发文量
51
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information Issue Information Digital transformation of warungs in Indonesia: The interrelation of socio-technical and indigenous factors User readiness as a determinant for use of big data analytics: A case of state corporations in Kenya
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1