The Myth of Counter-modern Ontologies: Indigenous People and the Modern Politics of Extractivism in Ecuador

IF 3 2区 社会学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Development and Change Pub Date : 2023-09-22 DOI:10.1111/dech.12790
Christian Tym
{"title":"The Myth of Counter-modern Ontologies: Indigenous People and the Modern Politics of Extractivism in Ecuador","authors":"Christian Tym","doi":"10.1111/dech.12790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Anti-extractivist critique still positions Indigenous people as protagonists of counter-modern political sentiment, whether as opponents of modernity's processes of productive rationalization and economic integration, or as embodying ontologies that reject modernity's conceptual separation of humanity from natural resources. Indigenous anti-extractivism is thus said to represent a rupture of modern politics in that it exceeds politics as we know it. Yet the calculus of modern politics remains central to Indigenous responses to resource extraction, even in social contexts where non-modern ontological suppositions are widely adhered to. This is illustrated through an ethnography of Indigenous mining in the southern Ecuadorean Amazon and national-level electoral data showing the sweeping support of Indigenous people for former leftist President Rafael Correa's ‘neo-extractivist’ programme. This persistent modernity of Indigenous resource politics exposes the fallacy of projecting counter-modern sentiments onto Indigenous peoples.</p>","PeriodicalId":48194,"journal":{"name":"Development and Change","volume":"54 4","pages":"714-738"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dech.12790","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development and Change","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dech.12790","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Anti-extractivist critique still positions Indigenous people as protagonists of counter-modern political sentiment, whether as opponents of modernity's processes of productive rationalization and economic integration, or as embodying ontologies that reject modernity's conceptual separation of humanity from natural resources. Indigenous anti-extractivism is thus said to represent a rupture of modern politics in that it exceeds politics as we know it. Yet the calculus of modern politics remains central to Indigenous responses to resource extraction, even in social contexts where non-modern ontological suppositions are widely adhered to. This is illustrated through an ethnography of Indigenous mining in the southern Ecuadorean Amazon and national-level electoral data showing the sweeping support of Indigenous people for former leftist President Rafael Correa's ‘neo-extractivist’ programme. This persistent modernity of Indigenous resource politics exposes the fallacy of projecting counter-modern sentiments onto Indigenous peoples.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
反现代本体论的神话:厄瓜多尔土著人民与采掘主义的现代政治
反采掘主义批判仍然将土著人定位为反现代政治情绪的主角,无论是作为现代性生产合理化和经济一体化进程的反对者,还是作为拒绝现代性将人类与自然资源概念分离的本体论的体现者。因此,土著人的反采掘主义被认为代表了现代政治的断裂,因为它超越了我们所知的政治。然而,现代政治的演算仍然是土著人对资源开采的反应的核心,即使在广泛遵循非现代本体论假设的社会背景下也是如此。厄瓜多尔亚马逊南部土著采矿的民族志和国家层面的选举数据表明,土著人民对前左翼总统拉斐尔·科雷亚的“新采掘主义者”计划给予了广泛支持。土著资源政治的这种持续的现代性暴露了将反现代情绪投射到土著人民身上的谬论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Development and Change
Development and Change DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
3.30%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Development and Change is essential reading for anyone interested in development studies and social change. It publishes articles from a wide range of authors, both well-established specialists and young scholars, and is an important resource for: - social science faculties and research institutions - international development agencies and NGOs - graduate teachers and researchers - all those with a serious interest in the dynamics of development, from reflective activists to analytical practitioners
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information The Political Economy of Reparations and the Dialectic of Transnational Capitalism Mobilized Resilience and Development under Sanctions in Iran A Critical Framing of Data for Development: Historicizing Data Relations and AI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1