Cis women's bodies at work: co-modification and (in)visibility in organization and management studies and menopause at work scholarship

IF 7.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS International Journal of Management Reviews Pub Date : 2022-11-25 DOI:10.1111/ijmr.12318
Vanessa Beck, Jo Brewis, Andrea Davies, Jesse Matheson
{"title":"Cis women's bodies at work: co-modification and (in)visibility in organization and management studies and menopause at work scholarship","authors":"Vanessa Beck,&nbsp;Jo Brewis,&nbsp;Andrea Davies,&nbsp;Jesse Matheson","doi":"10.1111/ijmr.12318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper reviews research on cis women's bodily self-discipline in the workplace. We compare literature exemplifying the ‘bodily turn’ in organization and management studies to scholarship on menopause at work, to identify key themes across these oeuvres and the significance of the blind spots in each. There is little overlap between them: only eleven organization and management studies publications dealt with menopause. In classifying these literatures using Forbes’ (2009) concept of co-modification, we distil four themes: bodily moulding; non-disclosure; failing; and resistance, redefinition and reclamation. Based on this, we argue for more substantive considerations of menopause in organization and management studies, and suggest what the organization and management literature has to offer its sister scholarship. For example, we foreground how menopause exacerbates the visibility paradox facing female workers which organization and management studies identifies; and argue that menopause at work scholarship should pay more attention to specific bodily accommodations, refusals and the ‘unscripted’ aspects of menopause in organizations.</p>","PeriodicalId":48326,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Management Reviews","volume":"25 3","pages":"495-514"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijmr.12318","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Management Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijmr.12318","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper reviews research on cis women's bodily self-discipline in the workplace. We compare literature exemplifying the ‘bodily turn’ in organization and management studies to scholarship on menopause at work, to identify key themes across these oeuvres and the significance of the blind spots in each. There is little overlap between them: only eleven organization and management studies publications dealt with menopause. In classifying these literatures using Forbes’ (2009) concept of co-modification, we distil four themes: bodily moulding; non-disclosure; failing; and resistance, redefinition and reclamation. Based on this, we argue for more substantive considerations of menopause in organization and management studies, and suggest what the organization and management literature has to offer its sister scholarship. For example, we foreground how menopause exacerbates the visibility paradox facing female workers which organization and management studies identifies; and argue that menopause at work scholarship should pay more attention to specific bodily accommodations, refusals and the ‘unscripted’ aspects of menopause in organizations.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cis妇女工作中的身体:在组织和管理研究中的共同修改和可见性以及更年期工作奖学金
本文综述了独联体女性职场身体自律的研究现状。我们将组织和管理研究中体现“身体转向”的文献与工作中更年期的学术文献进行了比较,以确定这些作品中的关键主题以及每个作品中盲点的重要性。它们之间几乎没有重叠:只有11份组织和管理研究出版物涉及更年期。在使用Forbes(2009)的共同修饰概念对这些文献进行分类时,我们提炼出四个主题:身体塑造;不披露;弱点以及抵抗、重新定义和开垦。基于此,我们主张在组织和管理研究中对更年期进行更实质性的考虑,并提出组织和管理文献可以提供的姊妹学术。例如,我们展望了更年期如何加剧组织和管理研究所发现的女性工作者面临的可见性悖论;并认为更年期工作奖学金应该更多地关注组织中更年期的具体身体适应、拒绝和“无剧本”方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Management Reviews (IJMR) stands as the premier global review journal in Organisation and Management Studies (OMS). Its published papers aim to provide substantial conceptual contributions, acting as a strategic platform for new research directions. IJMR plays a pivotal role in influencing how OMS scholars conceptualize research in their respective fields. The journal's reviews critically assess the state of knowledge in specific fields, appraising the conceptual foundations of competing paradigms to advance current and future research in the area.
期刊最新文献
Uncovering the impact of digital technologies on strategising: Evidence from a systematic literature review One name for two concepts: A systematic literature review about meta‐organizations Career success and geographical location: A systematic review and future research agenda Towards a heuristic view of managerial heuristics: Integrating divergent perspectives The good, the bad and the evil: A unified conceptualization of negative leadership behaviour
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1