You'll never walk alone: Loneliness, religion, and politico-economic transformation

IF 1.4 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Politics & Policy Pub Date : 2023-06-27 DOI:10.1111/polp.12538
Annie Tubadji
{"title":"You'll never walk alone: Loneliness, religion, and politico-economic transformation","authors":"Annie Tubadji","doi":"10.1111/polp.12538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>The rise of subversive religious beliefs has been recently documented as related to the politico-economic radicalization of places that feel left behind. When is the traditional local religious institution so socio-economically inefficient in providing hope for “not walking alone” to become substituted by subversive religious beliefs on the market for hope? This article suggests a detailed methodology, linking micro and macro levels, that starts from the quantification of the individual gain from religion as a source for well-being by providing the feeling of “not walking alone.” This micro gain is next used: (i) to evaluate a religious institution in terms of the social welfare that it generates, and (ii) to monitor this religious institution for losing its market to subversive religious beliefs, related to radical politico-economic transformations. To illustrate this methodology, I analyze the socio-economic efficiency of the Church of England as a predictive tool for the Brexit vote.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Related Articles</h3>\n \n <p>Gainous, Jason, and Bill Radunovich. 2008. “Religion and Core Values: A Reformulation of the Funnel of Causality.” <i>Politics &amp; Policy</i> 33(1): 154–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2005.tb00213.x.</p>\n \n <p>Giugni, Marco, and Maria T. Grasso. 2016. “How Civil Society Actors Responded to the Economic Crisis: The Interaction of Material Deprivation and Perceptions of Political Opportunity Structures.” <i>Politics &amp; Policy</i> 44(3): 447–72. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/polp.12157/abstract.</p>\n \n <p>Temple, Luke, Maria T. Grasso, Barbara Buraczynska, Sotirios Karampampas, and Patrick English. 2016. “Neoliberal Narrative in Times of Economic Crisis: A Political Claims Analysis of the U.K. Press, 2007–14.” <i>Politics &amp; Policy</i> 44(3): 553–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12161.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51679,"journal":{"name":"Politics & Policy","volume":"51 4","pages":"661-695"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/polp.12538","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/polp.12538","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The rise of subversive religious beliefs has been recently documented as related to the politico-economic radicalization of places that feel left behind. When is the traditional local religious institution so socio-economically inefficient in providing hope for “not walking alone” to become substituted by subversive religious beliefs on the market for hope? This article suggests a detailed methodology, linking micro and macro levels, that starts from the quantification of the individual gain from religion as a source for well-being by providing the feeling of “not walking alone.” This micro gain is next used: (i) to evaluate a religious institution in terms of the social welfare that it generates, and (ii) to monitor this religious institution for losing its market to subversive religious beliefs, related to radical politico-economic transformations. To illustrate this methodology, I analyze the socio-economic efficiency of the Church of England as a predictive tool for the Brexit vote.

Related Articles

Gainous, Jason, and Bill Radunovich. 2008. “Religion and Core Values: A Reformulation of the Funnel of Causality.” Politics & Policy 33(1): 154–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2005.tb00213.x.

Giugni, Marco, and Maria T. Grasso. 2016. “How Civil Society Actors Responded to the Economic Crisis: The Interaction of Material Deprivation and Perceptions of Political Opportunity Structures.” Politics & Policy 44(3): 447–72. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/polp.12157/abstract.

Temple, Luke, Maria T. Grasso, Barbara Buraczynska, Sotirios Karampampas, and Patrick English. 2016. “Neoliberal Narrative in Times of Economic Crisis: A Political Claims Analysis of the U.K. Press, 2007–14.” Politics & Policy 44(3): 553–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12161.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
你永远不会独行:孤独、宗教和政治经济转型
颠覆性宗教信仰的兴起最近被记录为与感觉落后的地方的政治经济激进化有关。什么时候,传统的地方宗教机构在为“不独行”提供希望方面社会经济效率如此低下,却被市场上颠覆性的宗教信仰所取代?这篇文章提出了一种详细的方法,将微观和宏观层面联系起来,从量化宗教作为幸福来源的个人收益开始,通过提供“不孤独行走”的感觉。这种微观收益接下来被使用:(i)从宗教机构产生的社会福利角度评估宗教机构,以及(ii)监督这一宗教机构是否因与激进政治经济转型有关的颠覆性宗教信仰而失去市场。为了说明这种方法,我分析了作为英国脱欧投票预测工具的英国教会的社会经济效率。相关文章Gainous,Jason和Bill Radunovich。2008年,《宗教与核心价值观:因果关系漏斗的改造》,《政治学》;政策33(1):154–80。https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2005.tb00213.x.Giugni、Marco和Maria T.Grasso。2016年,《公民社会行动者如何应对经济危机:物质剥夺与政治机会结构感知的相互作用》,《政治与经济》;政策44(3):447-72。http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/polp.12157/abstract.Temple、Luke、Maria T.Grasso、Barbara Buraczynska、Sotirios Karampampas和Patrick English。《经济危机时期的新自由主义叙事:英国出版社政治主张分析》,2007-14;政策44(3):553-76。https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12161.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Politics & Policy
Politics & Policy POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
23.10%
发文量
61
期刊最新文献
Issue Information “Where you stand depends on where you sit”: The politics of petroleum pricing in Ghana's election cycle Note from the Editor and Acknowledgment of Reviewers 2023–2024 A paradox of public engagement: The discursive politics of environmental justice in Canada's Chemical Valley Democratic interventionists versus pragmatic realists: Employing the advocacy coalition framework to explain Obama's shift in multilateralism with European allies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1