{"title":"An Uncommonly Good Foundation for Research Ethics","authors":"Nancy M. P. King","doi":"10.1002/eahr.500161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Should research ethics scholars, clinical investigators, and human research professionals read a thick book by a moral philosopher on the foundations of research ethics? Absolutely. Why? Because everyone who has tried to figure out how research ethics and regulatory compliance fit together, or tried to keep up with the vast array of regulations, guidance documents, educational materials, and scholarly literature, already knows that the human research protections system is mined with contradictions, gaps, and confusions. It holds together well enough, but many dedicated folks have long struggled to MacGyver rickety spots of theory and practice known to be problematic. <i>For the Common Good</i>: <i>Philosophical Foundations of Research Ethics</i>, by Alex John London, comes to the rescue, offering an eloquently structured, amply justified, and ultimately persuasive theoretical foundation on which many necessary repairs can now be built.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36829,"journal":{"name":"Ethics & human research","volume":"45 2","pages":"40-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics & human research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eahr.500161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Should research ethics scholars, clinical investigators, and human research professionals read a thick book by a moral philosopher on the foundations of research ethics? Absolutely. Why? Because everyone who has tried to figure out how research ethics and regulatory compliance fit together, or tried to keep up with the vast array of regulations, guidance documents, educational materials, and scholarly literature, already knows that the human research protections system is mined with contradictions, gaps, and confusions. It holds together well enough, but many dedicated folks have long struggled to MacGyver rickety spots of theory and practice known to be problematic. For the Common Good: Philosophical Foundations of Research Ethics, by Alex John London, comes to the rescue, offering an eloquently structured, amply justified, and ultimately persuasive theoretical foundation on which many necessary repairs can now be built.
研究伦理学者、临床研究人员和人类研究专业人员是否应该阅读一本道德哲学家关于研究伦理基础的厚书?绝对地为什么?因为每个试图弄清楚研究伦理和监管合规性如何结合在一起的人,或者试图跟上大量法规、指导文件、教育材料和学术文献的人,都知道人类研究保护体系充满了矛盾、空白和困惑。它很好地结合在一起,但许多敬业的人长期以来一直在努力克服理论和实践中存在问题的薄弱环节。亚历克斯·约翰·伦敦(Alex John London)的《为了共同利益:研究伦理的哲学基础》(For the Common Good:Philosophy Foundations of Research Ethics)拯救了这一局面,为现在可以进行许多必要的修复提供了一个结构清晰、充分合理且最终具有说服力的理论基础。