Does the Number of Stimuli Influence the Formation of the Endogenous Components of the Event-Related Auditory Evoked Potentials?

IF 1 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology Pub Date : 2023-10-06 eCollection Date: 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0042-1759605
Yorran Marques de Oliveira, Victor Goiris Calderaro, Eduardo Tanaka Massuda, Sthella Zanchetta, Humberto de Oliveira Simões
{"title":"Does the Number of Stimuli Influence the Formation of the Endogenous Components of the Event-Related Auditory Evoked Potentials?","authors":"Yorran Marques de Oliveira, Victor Goiris Calderaro, Eduardo Tanaka Massuda, Sthella Zanchetta, Humberto de Oliveira Simões","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1759605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>  The number of stimuli is important to determine the quality of auditory evoked potential records. However, there is no consensus on that number in studies, especially in the sample studied. <b>Objectives</b>  To investigate the influence of the number of rare stimuli on forming N2 and P3 components, with different types of acoustic stimuli. <b>Methods</b>  Cross-sectional, descriptive, comparative study, approved by the ethics committee of the institution. The sample comprised 20 normal hearing adults of both sexes, aged 18 to 29 years old, with normal scores in the mental state examination and auditory processing skills. The event-related auditory evoked potentials were performed with nonverbal (1 kHz versus 2 kHz) and verbal stimuli (/BA/ versus /DA/). The number of rare stimuli varied randomly in the recordings, with 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 presentations. <b>Results</b>  P3 latency was significantly higher for nonverbal stimuli with 50 rare stimuli. N2 latency did not show any difference between the type and number of stimuli. The absolute P3 and N2-P3 amplitudes showed significant differences for both types of stimuli, with higher amplitude for 10 rare stimuli, in contrast with the other ones. The linear tendency test indicated significance only for the amplitude - as the number of rare stimuli increased, the amplitude tended to decrease. <b>Conclusion</b>  The components were identifiable in the different numbers of rare stimuli and types of stimuli. The P3 and N2-P3 latency and amplitude increased with fewer verbal and nonverbal stimuli. Recording protocols must consider the number of rare stimuli.</p>","PeriodicalId":13731,"journal":{"name":"International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology","volume":"27 4","pages":"e636-e644"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a9/bd/10-1055-s-0042-1759605.PMC10593534.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1759605","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction  The number of stimuli is important to determine the quality of auditory evoked potential records. However, there is no consensus on that number in studies, especially in the sample studied. Objectives  To investigate the influence of the number of rare stimuli on forming N2 and P3 components, with different types of acoustic stimuli. Methods  Cross-sectional, descriptive, comparative study, approved by the ethics committee of the institution. The sample comprised 20 normal hearing adults of both sexes, aged 18 to 29 years old, with normal scores in the mental state examination and auditory processing skills. The event-related auditory evoked potentials were performed with nonverbal (1 kHz versus 2 kHz) and verbal stimuli (/BA/ versus /DA/). The number of rare stimuli varied randomly in the recordings, with 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 presentations. Results  P3 latency was significantly higher for nonverbal stimuli with 50 rare stimuli. N2 latency did not show any difference between the type and number of stimuli. The absolute P3 and N2-P3 amplitudes showed significant differences for both types of stimuli, with higher amplitude for 10 rare stimuli, in contrast with the other ones. The linear tendency test indicated significance only for the amplitude - as the number of rare stimuli increased, the amplitude tended to decrease. Conclusion  The components were identifiable in the different numbers of rare stimuli and types of stimuli. The P3 and N2-P3 latency and amplitude increased with fewer verbal and nonverbal stimuli. Recording protocols must consider the number of rare stimuli.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
刺激数量是否影响事件相关听觉诱发电位内源性成分的形成?
介绍 刺激的数量对于确定听觉诱发电位记录的质量是重要的。然而,在研究中,尤其是在所研究的样本中,对这个数字没有达成共识。目标 研究在不同类型的声刺激下,稀有刺激次数对N2和P3成分形成的影响。方法 经机构伦理委员会批准的横断面、描述性、比较研究。样本包括20名听力正常的男女成年人,年龄在18至29岁之间,在精神状态检查和听觉处理技能方面得分正常。事件相关听觉诱发电位是用非语言(1 kHz与2 kHz)和言语刺激(/BA/对/DA/)。罕见刺激的数量在记录中随机变化,分别为10、20、30、40和50次。后果 在50种罕见刺激的非言语刺激中,P3潜伏期显著较高。N2潜伏期在刺激的类型和数量之间没有显示出任何差异。两种类型的刺激的绝对P3和N2-P3振幅显示出显著差异,与其他刺激相比,10种罕见刺激的振幅更高。线性趋势测试只对振幅有显著性——随着稀有刺激次数的增加,振幅有下降的趋势。结论 在不同数量的稀有刺激和刺激类型中,这些成分是可识别的。P3和N2-P3的潜伏期和振幅随着言语和非言语刺激的减少而增加。记录协议必须考虑罕见刺激的数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Audiological Characterization of Individuals with Cornelia de Lange Syndrome. Do Anatomical Variations of Sphenoid Sinus Influence Sella Exposure and Residual Disease in Pituitary Surgery? - A Study in an Indian Population. Dysphagia: Focus in Diagnosis. Efficacy of Expansion Pharyngoplasty without Drug-induced Sleep Endoscopy Screening in Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Results of a New Treatment Protocol for Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss Using Betamethasone for Intratympanic Therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1