Comparison of the Analgesic Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Quadratus Lumborum Block and Ilioinguinal-Iliohypogastric Nerve Block in Paediatric Patients After Inguinal Hernia Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

Mustafa Altınay, Hacer Şebnem Türk
{"title":"Comparison of the Analgesic Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Quadratus Lumborum Block and Ilioinguinal-Iliohypogastric Nerve Block in Paediatric Patients After Inguinal Hernia Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Mustafa Altınay,&nbsp;Hacer Şebnem Türk","doi":"10.4274/TJAR.2023.231289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of quadratus lumborum block (QLB) and ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block (IIIHB) in paediatric patients who have undergone unilateral inguinal hernia surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective randomized controlled study was designed in a single center and included 60 paediatric patients aged 2-7 years who had undergone inguinal hernia repair surgery and received an American Society of Anesthesiologists score of 1-2. Patients were randomized into two groups: those receiving ultrasound-guided QLB and those receiving IIIHB. The primary outcomes of the study were patients' face, legs, activity, cry, and consolability (FLACC) scores at 1, 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours post-surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean heart rate 15 and 30 minutes post-surgery in the QLB group was lower than that of the IIIHB group, and the difference at both times was statistically significant (<i>P</i> < 0.001). The mean FLACC score of the QLB group was lower than that of the IIIHB group at 6, 12, and 24 hours post-surgery, and the differences were statistically significant (<i>P</i>=0.004, <i>P</i>=0.006, and <i>P</i> < 0.001, respectively). Between the groups, there was no statistically significant difference in the number of patients who were administered rescue analgesics or oral ibuprofen, the time of first ibuprofen administration, or the frequency of complications (<i>P</i>=1.000, <i>P</i>=0.145, <i>P</i>=0.195, and <i>P</i>=1.000, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with IIIHB, QLB achieves superior postoperative analgesic effects in paediatric patients who have undergone inguinal hernia surgery, as evidenced by longer analgesic periods, lower pain scores, and lower analgesic consumption.</p>","PeriodicalId":23353,"journal":{"name":"Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation","volume":"51 5","pages":"443-449"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10606743/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/TJAR.2023.231289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of quadratus lumborum block (QLB) and ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block (IIIHB) in paediatric patients who have undergone unilateral inguinal hernia surgery.

Methods: This prospective randomized controlled study was designed in a single center and included 60 paediatric patients aged 2-7 years who had undergone inguinal hernia repair surgery and received an American Society of Anesthesiologists score of 1-2. Patients were randomized into two groups: those receiving ultrasound-guided QLB and those receiving IIIHB. The primary outcomes of the study were patients' face, legs, activity, cry, and consolability (FLACC) scores at 1, 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours post-surgery.

Results: The mean heart rate 15 and 30 minutes post-surgery in the QLB group was lower than that of the IIIHB group, and the difference at both times was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The mean FLACC score of the QLB group was lower than that of the IIIHB group at 6, 12, and 24 hours post-surgery, and the differences were statistically significant (P=0.004, P=0.006, and P < 0.001, respectively). Between the groups, there was no statistically significant difference in the number of patients who were administered rescue analgesics or oral ibuprofen, the time of first ibuprofen administration, or the frequency of complications (P=1.000, P=0.145, P=0.195, and P=1.000, respectively).

Conclusion: Compared with IIIHB, QLB achieves superior postoperative analgesic effects in paediatric patients who have undergone inguinal hernia surgery, as evidenced by longer analgesic periods, lower pain scores, and lower analgesic consumption.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声引导下腰方肌阻滞与髂腹股沟-髂腹下神经阻滞治疗小儿腹股沟疝术后镇痛效果的比较:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
目的:比较腰方肌阻滞(QLB)和髂腹股沟-髂腹下神经阻滞(IIIHB)在小儿单侧腹股沟疝手术后的镇痛效果。方法:这项前瞻性随机对照研究是在一个中心设计的,包括60名年龄在2-7岁的儿科患者,他们接受了腹股沟疝修补手术,美国麻醉师协会的评分为1-2。患者被随机分为两组:接受超声引导QLB的患者和接受IIIHB的患者。研究的主要结果是患者在术后1、2、6、12和24小时的面部、腿部、活动、哭泣和安慰(FLACC)评分。结果:QLB组术后15和30分钟的平均心率低于IIIHB组,QLB组在术后6、12和24小时的平均FLACC评分低于IIIHB组,差异具有统计学意义(分别为P=0.004、P=0.006和P<0.001)。两组之间,服用抢救性镇痛药或口服布洛芬的患者人数、首次服用布洛芬的时间或并发症发生率均无统计学意义(分别为P=1.000、P=0.145、P=0.195和P=1.000)。结论:与IIIHB相比,QLB在接受腹股沟疝手术的儿科患者中获得了卓越的术后镇痛效果,镇痛时间更长、疼痛评分更低、镇痛消耗量更低就是明证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Comparative Study of Magnesium Sulfate, Lignocaine, and Propofol for Attenuating Hemodynamic Response During Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Under General Anaesthesia: A Prospective Randomized Trial. Anaesthesia Management of A Patient with Airway Obstruction Caused by Prosthetic Vascular Graft Invasion into the Tracheal Lumen. Bispectral Index Guidance Reduced Target Plasma Propofol Concentration During ERCP in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis. Dexmedetomidine Versus Fentanyl in Intraoperative Neuromuscular Monitoring Using A Propofol-based Total Intravenous Anaesthesia Regimen in Spine Surgeries. Implementation of ERAS Protocols: In Theory and Practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1