Preserved 2-y Liver Transplant Outcomes Following Simultaneous Thoracoabdominal DCD Organ Procurement Despite Effects on Liver Utilization Rate.

IF 1.9 Q3 TRANSPLANTATION Transplantation Direct Pub Date : 2023-10-20 eCollection Date: 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1097/TXD.0000000000001528
Steven A Wisel, Justin A Steggerda, Carrie Thiessen, Garrett R Roll, Qiudong Chen, Jason Thomas, Bhupinder Kaur, Pedro Catarino, Joanna Chikwe, Irene K Kim
{"title":"Preserved 2-y Liver Transplant Outcomes Following Simultaneous Thoracoabdominal DCD Organ Procurement Despite Effects on Liver Utilization Rate.","authors":"Steven A Wisel, Justin A Steggerda, Carrie Thiessen, Garrett R Roll, Qiudong Chen, Jason Thomas, Bhupinder Kaur, Pedro Catarino, Joanna Chikwe, Irene K Kim","doi":"10.1097/TXD.0000000000001528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current techniques for donation after circulatory determination of death (DCD) heart procurement, through either direct procurement and machine perfusion or thoracoabdominal normothermic regional perfusion (NRP), have demonstrated excellent heart transplant outcomes. However, the impact of thoracoabdominal DCD (TA-DCD) heart procurement on liver allograft outcomes and utilization is poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred sixty simultaneous heart and liver DCD donors were identified using the United Network for Organ Sharing/Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database between December 2019 and July 2021. Liver outcomes from TA-DCD donors were stratified by heart procurement technique and evaluated for organ utilization, graft survival, and patient survival. Results were compared with abdominal-only DCD (A-DCD; n = 1332) and donation after brain death (DBD; n = 12 891) liver transplants during the study interval. Kaplan-Meier methods with log-rank testing were used to evaluate patient and graft survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred thirty-three of 160 livers procured from TA-DCD donors proceeded to transplant. TA-DCD donors were younger (mean 28.26 y; <i>P</i> < 0.0001) with lower body mass index (mean 26.61; <i>P</i> < 0.0001) than A-DCD and DBD donors. TA-DCD livers had equivalent patient survival ( <i>P</i> = 0.893) and superior graft survival (<i>P</i> = 0.009) compared with A-DCD. TA-DCD livers had higher rates of organ discard for long warm ischemia time (37.0%) than A-DCD (20.5%) and DBD (0.5%; <i>P</i> < 0.0001), with direct procurement and machine perfusion procurements leading to a higher discard rate (18.5%) than NRP procurements (7.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Liver transplants after TA-DCD donation demonstrated equivalent patient outcomes and excellent graft outcomes. NRP procurements resulted in the lowest rate of organ discard after DCD donation and may represent an optimal strategy to maximize organ utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":23225,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation Direct","volume":"9 11","pages":"e1528"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10593259/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation Direct","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001528","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPLANTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Current techniques for donation after circulatory determination of death (DCD) heart procurement, through either direct procurement and machine perfusion or thoracoabdominal normothermic regional perfusion (NRP), have demonstrated excellent heart transplant outcomes. However, the impact of thoracoabdominal DCD (TA-DCD) heart procurement on liver allograft outcomes and utilization is poorly understood.

Methods: One hundred sixty simultaneous heart and liver DCD donors were identified using the United Network for Organ Sharing/Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database between December 2019 and July 2021. Liver outcomes from TA-DCD donors were stratified by heart procurement technique and evaluated for organ utilization, graft survival, and patient survival. Results were compared with abdominal-only DCD (A-DCD; n = 1332) and donation after brain death (DBD; n = 12 891) liver transplants during the study interval. Kaplan-Meier methods with log-rank testing were used to evaluate patient and graft survival.

Results: One hundred thirty-three of 160 livers procured from TA-DCD donors proceeded to transplant. TA-DCD donors were younger (mean 28.26 y; P < 0.0001) with lower body mass index (mean 26.61; P < 0.0001) than A-DCD and DBD donors. TA-DCD livers had equivalent patient survival ( P = 0.893) and superior graft survival (P = 0.009) compared with A-DCD. TA-DCD livers had higher rates of organ discard for long warm ischemia time (37.0%) than A-DCD (20.5%) and DBD (0.5%; P < 0.0001), with direct procurement and machine perfusion procurements leading to a higher discard rate (18.5%) than NRP procurements (7.4%).

Conclusions: Liver transplants after TA-DCD donation demonstrated equivalent patient outcomes and excellent graft outcomes. NRP procurements resulted in the lowest rate of organ discard after DCD donation and may represent an optimal strategy to maximize organ utilization.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
保存2 y肝脏移植手术后结果同时胸腹的器官DCD计划尽管对肝脏利用率的影响。
背景:目前通过直接获取和机器灌注或胸腹常温区域灌注(NRP)获得心脏的循环死亡确定(DCD)后捐赠技术已经证明了良好的心脏移植结果。然而,胸腹DCD(TA-DCD)心脏采购对肝移植结果和利用率的影响尚不清楚。方法:在2019年12月至2021年7月期间,使用器官共享联合网络/器官采购和移植网络数据库确定了160名同时进行心脏和肝脏DCD捐献者。通过心脏获取技术对TADCD供体的肝脏结果进行分层,并评估器官利用率、移植物存活率和患者存活率。结果与仅腹部DCD(A-DCD;n = 1332)和脑死亡后的捐赠(DBD;n = 12 891)肝移植。Kaplan-Meier方法和对数秩检验用于评估患者和移植物的生存率。结果:从TADCD供体获得的160个肝脏中有133个进行了移植。TADCD供体较年轻(平均28.26岁;P P P = 0.893)和优良移植物存活率(P = 0.009)。TA-DCD肝在长时间热缺血时的器官丢弃率(37.0%)高于A-DCD(20.5%)和DBD(0.5%);P 结论:TA-DCD捐献后的肝移植显示出同等的患者结果和良好的移植物结果。NRP采购导致DCD捐赠后器官丢弃率最低,可能代表了最大限度利用器官的最佳策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transplantation Direct
Transplantation Direct TRANSPLANTATION-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
193
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cardiorespiratory Fitness From Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing Is a Comprehensive Risk-stratifying Tool in Liver Transplant Candidates. Critical Considerations for Expanding Indications for Nonvascularized Rectus Fascia Transplantation: Clarifying Definitions, Techniques, and Immunogenicity. First Longitudinal Analysis of the Immunological Mechanism at Play in Uterus Transplantation. Mitigating High-risk EBV and CMV Through Kidney Paired Donation: A Survey of Potential Donor and Recipient Candidates. Outcomes Using High KDPI Kidneys in Recipients Over 65 y of Age.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1