Home OCT Imaging for Newly Diagnosed Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

IF 5.7 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY Ophthalmology. Retina Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.oret.2023.10.012
Kevin J. Blinder MD , Claire Calhoun MS , Maureen G. Maguire PhD , Adam R. Glassman MS , Calvin E. Mein MD , Darrell E. Baskin MD , Gabriela Vieyra PhD, MPH , Lee M. Jampol MD , Moises A. Chica MD , Jennifer K. Sun MD, MPH , Daniel F. Martin MD
{"title":"Home OCT Imaging for Newly Diagnosed Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration","authors":"Kevin J. Blinder MD ,&nbsp;Claire Calhoun MS ,&nbsp;Maureen G. Maguire PhD ,&nbsp;Adam R. Glassman MS ,&nbsp;Calvin E. Mein MD ,&nbsp;Darrell E. Baskin MD ,&nbsp;Gabriela Vieyra PhD, MPH ,&nbsp;Lee M. Jampol MD ,&nbsp;Moises A. Chica MD ,&nbsp;Jennifer K. Sun MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Daniel F. Martin MD","doi":"10.1016/j.oret.2023.10.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess the feasibility of daily Home OCT imaging among patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Prospective observational study.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Participants with ≥ 1 eye with previously untreated nAMD and visual acuity 20/20 to 20/320.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Participants meeting the ocular eligibility criteria were considered for enrollment; those who provided consent received a Notal Vision Home OCT device. Participants were instructed to scan both eyes daily. Retina specialists managed treatment according to their standard practice, without access to the Home OCT data. The presence of fluid detected by a reading center (RC) from in-office OCT scans was compared with fluid volumes measured by the Notal OCT Analyzer (NOA) on Home OCT images.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>Proportion of participants meeting ocular eligibility criteria who participated in daily scanning, frequency and duration of scanning, proportion of scans eligible for fluid quantification, participant experience with the device, agreement between the RC and NOA fluid determinations, and characteristics of fluid dynamics.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 40 participants meeting ocular eligibility criteria, 14 (35%) initiated self-scanning. Planned travel (n = 7, 17.5%) and patient-reported inadequate cell reception for the upload of images (n = 5, 12.5%) were the most frequent reasons for not participating. Considering scans of the study eye only, the mean (standard deviation) was 6.3 (0.6) for weekly scanning frequency and 47 (17) seconds for scan duration per eye. Among 2304 scans, 86.5% were eligible for fluid quantification. All participants agreed that scanning became easier over time, and only 1 did not want to continue daily scanning. For 35 scan pairs judged as having fluid by in-office OCT, the NOA detected fluid on 31 scans (89%). For 14 scan pairs judged as having no fluid on in-office OCT, the NOA did not detect fluid on 10 scans (71%). Daily fluid patterns after treatment initiation varied considerably between patients.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>For patients with nAMD who initiated home scanning, frequency and quality of scanning and accuracy of fluid detection were sufficient to assess the monitoring of fluid at home. Accommodations for travel and Wi-Fi connectivity could improve uptake of the Home OCT device.</p></div><div><h3>Financial Disclosure(s)</h3><p>Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19501,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology. Retina","volume":"8 4","pages":"Pages 376-387"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology. Retina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468653023005146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To assess the feasibility of daily Home OCT imaging among patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).

Design

Prospective observational study.

Participants

Participants with ≥ 1 eye with previously untreated nAMD and visual acuity 20/20 to 20/320.

Methods

Participants meeting the ocular eligibility criteria were considered for enrollment; those who provided consent received a Notal Vision Home OCT device. Participants were instructed to scan both eyes daily. Retina specialists managed treatment according to their standard practice, without access to the Home OCT data. The presence of fluid detected by a reading center (RC) from in-office OCT scans was compared with fluid volumes measured by the Notal OCT Analyzer (NOA) on Home OCT images.

Main Outcome Measures

Proportion of participants meeting ocular eligibility criteria who participated in daily scanning, frequency and duration of scanning, proportion of scans eligible for fluid quantification, participant experience with the device, agreement between the RC and NOA fluid determinations, and characteristics of fluid dynamics.

Results

Among 40 participants meeting ocular eligibility criteria, 14 (35%) initiated self-scanning. Planned travel (n = 7, 17.5%) and patient-reported inadequate cell reception for the upload of images (n = 5, 12.5%) were the most frequent reasons for not participating. Considering scans of the study eye only, the mean (standard deviation) was 6.3 (0.6) for weekly scanning frequency and 47 (17) seconds for scan duration per eye. Among 2304 scans, 86.5% were eligible for fluid quantification. All participants agreed that scanning became easier over time, and only 1 did not want to continue daily scanning. For 35 scan pairs judged as having fluid by in-office OCT, the NOA detected fluid on 31 scans (89%). For 14 scan pairs judged as having no fluid on in-office OCT, the NOA did not detect fluid on 10 scans (71%). Daily fluid patterns after treatment initiation varied considerably between patients.

Conclusions

For patients with nAMD who initiated home scanning, frequency and quality of scanning and accuracy of fluid detection were sufficient to assess the monitoring of fluid at home. Accommodations for travel and Wi-Fi connectivity could improve uptake of the Home OCT device.

Financial Disclosure(s)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
家庭光学相干断层扫描成像治疗新诊断的新血管年龄相关性黄斑变性:可行性研究。
目的:评价在新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性(nAMD)患者中进行日常家庭光学相干断层扫描(OCT)成像的可行性。设计:前瞻性观察研究。参与者:至少有一只眼睛以前未经治疗,视力为20/20至20/320的参与者。方法:符合眼部资格标准的参与者被考虑入组;提供同意书的患者接受了Notal Vision Home OCT设备。参与者被要求每天扫描双眼。视网膜专家根据他们的标准实践管理治疗,没有访问家庭OCT数据。将读取中心从办公室OCT扫描中检测到的流体存在与Notal OCT分析仪(NOA)在家庭OCT图像上测量的流体体积进行比较。主要结果指标:符合眼部资格标准的参与者参与日常扫描的比例、扫描频率和持续时间、符合液体定量的扫描比例、参与者对该设备的体验、阅读中心和NOA液体测定之间的一致性以及流体动力学特征。结果:在40名符合眼部资格标准的参与者中,14人(35%)开始自我扫描。计划旅行(n=7,17.5%)和患者报告的上传图像的细胞接收不足(n=5,12.5%)是不参与的最常见原因。仅考虑研究眼睛的扫描,每周扫描频率的平均值(SD)为6.3(0.6),每只眼睛的扫描持续时间为47(17)秒。在2304次扫描中,86.5%符合液体定量。所有参与者都认为,随着时间的推移,扫描变得越来越容易,只有一个人不想继续每天的扫描。对于办公室OCT判断为有液体的35对扫描,NOA在31次扫描中检测到液体(89%)。对于在办公室OCT上被判断为没有液体的14对扫描,NOA在10次扫描中没有检测到液体(71%)。开始治疗后,患者的日常体液模式差异很大。结论:对于开始家庭扫描的nAMD患者,扫描的频率和质量以及液体检测的准确性足以评估在家中对液体的监测。旅行和Wi-Fi连接的便利条件可以提高家庭OCT设备的使用率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ophthalmology. Retina
Ophthalmology. Retina Medicine-Ophthalmology
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
274
审稿时长
33 days
期刊最新文献
Giant Outer Retinal Tear in Retinoschisis Retinal Detachment. Misdiagnosis in Referrals for Advanced Retinopathy of Prematurity. Vitreous Cyst from Retinal Hole in Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy. Bilateral Macular Cherry-Red Spots in Infantile Sandhoff Disease. Transscleral Anterior Segment OCT Imaging in Choroidal Detachment Using Swept-Source OCT.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1