Gulnar Azevedo E Silva, Giseli Nogueira Damacena, Caroline Madalena Ribeiro, Luciana Leite de Mattos Alcantara, Paulo Roberto Borges de Souza Júnior, Célia Landmann Szwarcwald
{"title":"Papanicolaou test in Brazil: analysis of the National Health Survey of 2013 and 2019.","authors":"Gulnar Azevedo E Silva, Giseli Nogueira Damacena, Caroline Madalena Ribeiro, Luciana Leite de Mattos Alcantara, Paulo Roberto Borges de Souza Júnior, Célia Landmann Szwarcwald","doi":"10.11606/s1518-8787.2023057004798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the coverage of cervical cancer screening in Brazil in 2013 and 2019, investigating the factors associated with having the test performed and the reasons given for not doing it. Additionally, a comparison is made concerning the time taken to receive the test result in SUS (Sistema Único de Saúde) and in the private health services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from the National Health Survey (Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde - PNS), prevalence rates and corresponding confidence intervals were calculated to determine the frequency of recent cervical cancer screenings among women aged between 25 and 64 years old in Brazil, for both 2013 and 2019. Poisson regression models were employed to compare the prevalence of the outcome according to sociodemographic characteristics. The reasons for not having the test and the time between performing and receiving the result were also analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings revealed an increase in the coverage of preventive cervical cancer exams in Brazil from 78.7% in 2013 to 81.3% in 2019. Additionally, there was a decline in the proportion of women who had never undergone the exam, from 9.7% to 6.1%. Prevalence of test uptake was higher among white women, those with higher levels of education and income, and those residing in the South and Southeast regions of the country. The most commonly cited reasons for not taking the test were the impression it was unnecessary (45% in both 2013 and 2019) and never having been asked to undergo the test (20.6% in 2013 and 14.8% in 2019).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the high coverage of screening achieved in the country, there is great inequality in access to the test, and a non-negligible number of women are at greater risk of dying from a preventable disease. Efforts must be made to structure an organized screening program that identifies and captures the most vulnerable women.</p>","PeriodicalId":21230,"journal":{"name":"Revista de saude publica","volume":"57 ","pages":"55"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10519687/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de saude publica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2023057004798","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To compare the coverage of cervical cancer screening in Brazil in 2013 and 2019, investigating the factors associated with having the test performed and the reasons given for not doing it. Additionally, a comparison is made concerning the time taken to receive the test result in SUS (Sistema Único de Saúde) and in the private health services.
Methods: Using data from the National Health Survey (Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde - PNS), prevalence rates and corresponding confidence intervals were calculated to determine the frequency of recent cervical cancer screenings among women aged between 25 and 64 years old in Brazil, for both 2013 and 2019. Poisson regression models were employed to compare the prevalence of the outcome according to sociodemographic characteristics. The reasons for not having the test and the time between performing and receiving the result were also analyzed.
Results: The findings revealed an increase in the coverage of preventive cervical cancer exams in Brazil from 78.7% in 2013 to 81.3% in 2019. Additionally, there was a decline in the proportion of women who had never undergone the exam, from 9.7% to 6.1%. Prevalence of test uptake was higher among white women, those with higher levels of education and income, and those residing in the South and Southeast regions of the country. The most commonly cited reasons for not taking the test were the impression it was unnecessary (45% in both 2013 and 2019) and never having been asked to undergo the test (20.6% in 2013 and 14.8% in 2019).
Conclusions: Despite the high coverage of screening achieved in the country, there is great inequality in access to the test, and a non-negligible number of women are at greater risk of dying from a preventable disease. Efforts must be made to structure an organized screening program that identifies and captures the most vulnerable women.
目的:比较2013年和2019年巴西宫颈癌症筛查的覆盖率,调查与进行检测相关的因素和未进行检测的原因。此外,还比较了在SUS(SistemaÚnico de Saúde)和私人医疗服务机构收到检测结果所需的时间。方法:利用国家健康调查(Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde-PNS)的数据,计算2013年和2019年巴西25岁至64岁女性的患病率和相应的置信区间,以确定近期癌症筛查频率。根据社会人口学特征,采用泊松回归模型来比较结果的患病率。还分析了没有进行测试的原因以及执行和接收结果之间的时间。结果:研究结果显示,巴西预防性宫颈癌症检查的覆盖率从2013年的78.7%增加到2019年的81.3%。此外,从未参加过考试的女性比例从9.7%下降到6.1%。白人女性、教育水平和收入较高的女性以及居住在该国南部和东南部地区的女性的考试普及率更高。不参加检测的最常见原因是认为没有必要(2013年和2019年均为45%),而且从未被要求接受检测(2013年为20.6%,2019年为14.8%),不可忽视的一部分妇女死于可预防疾病的风险更大。必须努力构建一个有组织的筛查计划,以识别和捕获最弱势的妇女。