Investigating the role of internal security resources in post-adoption satisfaction with the Security-as-a-Service model: an organizational mindfulness perspective

IF 7.4 3区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Journal of Enterprise Information Management Pub Date : 2023-09-22 DOI:10.1108/jeim-07-2022-0227
Ali Vedadi, Nita Brooks, Tim Greer
{"title":"Investigating the role of internal security resources in post-adoption satisfaction with the Security-as-a-Service model: an organizational mindfulness perspective","authors":"Ali Vedadi, Nita Brooks, Tim Greer","doi":"10.1108/jeim-07-2022-0227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Many organizations struggle to utilize security-as-a-service (SecaaS) advantages effectively, thus challenging the assumption that adopting the SecaaS model will necessarily lead to post-adoption satisfaction. This research paper draws on the organizational mindfulness theory and investigates the factors that lead to satisfaction with SecaaS.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The key informant-based survey approach was employed to collect data from 215 organizations that were using the SecaaS model. PLS was used for data analysis.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Organizations with greater extents of internal security resources report higher satisfaction levels with SecaaS, thanks to the mediating effect of organizational mindfulness, and that organizations with extensive and mature security auditing were especially well-positioned to experience satisfaction with SecaaS.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This research provides new theoretical insights into the conditions under which organizations' post-adoption satisfaction with the SecaaS model is shaped by investigating the role of internal security resources and organizational mindfulness.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47889,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Enterprise Information Management","volume":"19 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Enterprise Information Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jeim-07-2022-0227","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Many organizations struggle to utilize security-as-a-service (SecaaS) advantages effectively, thus challenging the assumption that adopting the SecaaS model will necessarily lead to post-adoption satisfaction. This research paper draws on the organizational mindfulness theory and investigates the factors that lead to satisfaction with SecaaS.

Design/methodology/approach

The key informant-based survey approach was employed to collect data from 215 organizations that were using the SecaaS model. PLS was used for data analysis.

Findings

Organizations with greater extents of internal security resources report higher satisfaction levels with SecaaS, thanks to the mediating effect of organizational mindfulness, and that organizations with extensive and mature security auditing were especially well-positioned to experience satisfaction with SecaaS.

Originality/value

This research provides new theoretical insights into the conditions under which organizations' post-adoption satisfaction with the SecaaS model is shaped by investigating the role of internal security resources and organizational mindfulness.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调查内部安全资源在采用后对安全即服务模型的满意度中的作用:组织正念视角
目的:许多组织都在努力有效地利用安全即服务(SecaaS)的优势,因此挑战了采用SecaaS模型将必然导致采用后满意度的假设。本研究以组织正念理论为基础,探讨影响组织服务满意度的因素。设计/方法/方法采用基于关键信息的调查方法从215个使用SecaaS模型的组织中收集数据。采用PLS进行数据分析。由于组织意识的中介作用,拥有更多内部安全资源的组织对SecaaS的满意度更高,并且拥有广泛和成熟的安全审计的组织对SecaaS的满意度尤其高。原创性/价值本研究通过调查内部安全资源和组织正念的作用,为组织采用SecaaS模型后满意度的形成条件提供了新的理论见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The Journal of Enterprise Information Management (JEIM) is a significant contributor to the normative literature, offering both conceptual and practical insights supported by innovative discoveries that enrich the existing body of knowledge. Within its pages, JEIM presents research findings sourced from globally renowned experts. These contributions encompass scholarly examinations of cutting-edge theories and practices originating from leading research institutions. Additionally, the journal features inputs from senior business executives and consultants, who share their insights gleaned from specific enterprise case studies. Through these reports, readers benefit from a comparative analysis of different environmental contexts, facilitating valuable learning experiences. JEIM's distinctive blend of theoretical analysis and practical application fosters comprehensive discussions on commercial discoveries. This approach enhances the audience's comprehension of contemporary, applied, and rigorous information management practices, which extend across entire enterprises and their intricate supply chains.
期刊最新文献
Capabilities toward adoption of outcome-based contracts Unveiling the dark and scary side of metaverse: an in-depth qualitative investigation Building cybersecurity resilience: integrating defense and recovery investment strategies in an expected resilience framework Assessing the impact of digital service innovation (DSI) on business performance: the mediating effect of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Organisational cyber resilience: a heuristic for bridging foundations and applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1