A paradox of openness: Democracies, financial integration & crisis

Devin Case-Ruchala
{"title":"A paradox of openness: Democracies, financial integration & crisis","authors":"Devin Case-Ruchala","doi":"10.1007/s11558-023-09502-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Why do democracies experience financial crises more often than non-democracies? Revisiting the 2008 Great Financial Crisis (GFC) as a significant and informative test case, I argue that considering the way domestic institutions inhere in system-level structures is important to explaining crisis susceptibility among democracies since the turn of the twenty-first century. I introduce the mechanism of co-regime financial connections in showing that regime type is an important systematic feature of global financial flows. Employing a latent space network regression model using IMF Coordinated Portfolio Investment Survey (CPIS), I find that the network of cross-border portfolio asset investments is systematically patterned by co-democracy pairs. I then show that this regime-patterned interdependence affects increased financial crisis susceptibility among democracies. My findings build on literature highlighting the interdependence between domestic- and system-level factors and inform an empirical puzzle regarding the prevalence of financial crises among democracies.</p>","PeriodicalId":75182,"journal":{"name":"The review of international organizations","volume":"28 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The review of international organizations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-023-09502-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Why do democracies experience financial crises more often than non-democracies? Revisiting the 2008 Great Financial Crisis (GFC) as a significant and informative test case, I argue that considering the way domestic institutions inhere in system-level structures is important to explaining crisis susceptibility among democracies since the turn of the twenty-first century. I introduce the mechanism of co-regime financial connections in showing that regime type is an important systematic feature of global financial flows. Employing a latent space network regression model using IMF Coordinated Portfolio Investment Survey (CPIS), I find that the network of cross-border portfolio asset investments is systematically patterned by co-democracy pairs. I then show that this regime-patterned interdependence affects increased financial crisis susceptibility among democracies. My findings build on literature highlighting the interdependence between domestic- and system-level factors and inform an empirical puzzle regarding the prevalence of financial crises among democracies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开放的悖论:民主、金融一体化与危机
为什么民主国家比非民主国家更容易经历金融危机?回顾2008年金融大危机(GFC)作为一个重要且信息丰富的测试案例,我认为考虑系统级结构中固有的国内制度方式对于解释21世纪之交以来民主国家的危机敏感性非常重要。我介绍了共同制度金融联系的机制,表明制度类型是全球金融流动的一个重要系统特征。利用国际货币基金组织协调组合投资调查(CPIS)的潜在空间网络回归模型,我发现跨境组合资产投资网络是由共同民主对系统地模式化的。然后,我表明,这种以政权为模式的相互依存关系会增加民主国家对金融危机的敏感性。我的发现建立在强调国内和制度层面因素之间相互依赖的文献基础上,并揭示了一个关于民主国家金融危机普遍存在的实证难题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The brothers Karamazov go abroad: A dataset of Russian leaders’ foreign visits Global value chains and the design of trade agreements Locking in democracy? Transitions, returning autocratic elites, and human rights treaty commitment Power by Proxy: Participation as a Resource in Global Governance Less is more: Property rights and dictators’ demand for foreign direct investment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1