Improving primary to secondary school transitions: A systematic review of school-based interventions to prepare and support student social-emotional and educational outcomes

IF 9.6 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Educational Research Review Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100553
Ruth Beatson , Jon Quach , Louise Canterford , Paige Farrow , Charlotte Bagnall , Paul Hockey , Elissa Phillips , George C. Patton , Craig A. Olsson , Jemimah Ride , Lisa McKay Brown , Alasdair Roy , Lisa K Mundy
{"title":"Improving primary to secondary school transitions: A systematic review of school-based interventions to prepare and support student social-emotional and educational outcomes","authors":"Ruth Beatson ,&nbsp;Jon Quach ,&nbsp;Louise Canterford ,&nbsp;Paige Farrow ,&nbsp;Charlotte Bagnall ,&nbsp;Paul Hockey ,&nbsp;Elissa Phillips ,&nbsp;George C. Patton ,&nbsp;Craig A. Olsson ,&nbsp;Jemimah Ride ,&nbsp;Lisa McKay Brown ,&nbsp;Alasdair Roy ,&nbsp;Lisa K Mundy","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The transition from primary to secondary school is characterised by multiple substantial changes in children's physical, organisational, social, and pedagogical environments. Adjusting to these changes can be difficult, and problems doing so can have serious and wide-ranging long-term consequences. Currently it is not clear for educators, policy makers and researchers which programs and practices to prepare and support students are most efficacious, feasible to deliver, and suitable for different student populations. This review systematically identified and evaluated published experimental and quasi-experimental studies of school-based interventions to improve student social-emotional (i.e., peer-relationships, self-concept, mental health) and educational (i.e., school engagement, academic achievement) outcomes following primary-secondary transition. Searches were conducted across five bibliographic databases (ERIC, ERC, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Web of Science Core Collections), several program databases and research registers, in February 2022. A total of 26 studies met inclusion criteria. Overall, the review found most interventions had positive effects on at least one relevant transition adjustment outcome. However, there is a need for replication across different educational contexts, consistent measurement of outcomes, and use of more rigorous evaluation methods. The evidence presented in this review will inform decisions about the design or selection, implementation and further evaluation of primary-secondary transition interventions. In turn, this should lead to better social-emotional and educational outcomes for students, and may reduce some of the inequities exacerbated by a difficult transition to secondary school.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":"40 ","pages":"Article 100553"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Research Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X23000465","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The transition from primary to secondary school is characterised by multiple substantial changes in children's physical, organisational, social, and pedagogical environments. Adjusting to these changes can be difficult, and problems doing so can have serious and wide-ranging long-term consequences. Currently it is not clear for educators, policy makers and researchers which programs and practices to prepare and support students are most efficacious, feasible to deliver, and suitable for different student populations. This review systematically identified and evaluated published experimental and quasi-experimental studies of school-based interventions to improve student social-emotional (i.e., peer-relationships, self-concept, mental health) and educational (i.e., school engagement, academic achievement) outcomes following primary-secondary transition. Searches were conducted across five bibliographic databases (ERIC, ERC, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Web of Science Core Collections), several program databases and research registers, in February 2022. A total of 26 studies met inclusion criteria. Overall, the review found most interventions had positive effects on at least one relevant transition adjustment outcome. However, there is a need for replication across different educational contexts, consistent measurement of outcomes, and use of more rigorous evaluation methods. The evidence presented in this review will inform decisions about the design or selection, implementation and further evaluation of primary-secondary transition interventions. In turn, this should lead to better social-emotional and educational outcomes for students, and may reduce some of the inequities exacerbated by a difficult transition to secondary school.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改善中小学过渡:对学校干预措施的系统审查,以准备和支持学生的社会情感和教育成果
从小学到中学的转变的特点是儿童的身体、组织、社会和教学环境发生了多重实质性变化。适应这些变化可能很困难,这样做可能会产生严重而广泛的长期后果。目前,教育工作者、政策制定者和研究人员尚不清楚哪些为学生提供准备和支持的计划和实践最有效、最可行、最适合不同的学生群体。这篇综述系统地确定并评估了已发表的基于学校干预的实验和准实验研究,以改善中小学过渡后的学生社会情绪(即同伴关系、自我概念、心理健康)和教育(即学校参与度、学业成绩)结果。2022年2月,在五个书目数据库(ERIC、ERC、PsycINFO、CINAHL和Web of Science核心收藏)、几个项目数据库和研究登记册中进行了搜索。共有26项研究符合纳入标准。总体而言,审查发现,大多数干预措施至少对一个相关的过渡调整结果产生了积极影响。然而,需要在不同的教育背景下进行复制,对结果进行一致的衡量,并使用更严格的评估方法。本次审查中提供的证据将为有关初级-次级过渡干预措施的设计或选择、实施和进一步评估的决定提供信息。反过来,这应该会为学生带来更好的社会情感和教育成果,并可能减少因艰难过渡到中学而加剧的一些不平等现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Educational Research Review
Educational Research Review EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
19.40
自引率
0.90%
发文量
53
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Educational Research Review is an international journal catering to researchers and diverse agencies keen on reviewing studies and theoretical papers in education at any level. The journal welcomes high-quality articles that address educational research problems through a review approach, encompassing thematic or methodological reviews and meta-analyses. With an inclusive scope, the journal does not limit itself to any specific age range and invites articles across various settings where learning and education take place, such as schools, corporate training, and both formal and informal educational environments.
期刊最新文献
Data literacy of principals in K–12 school contexts: A systematic review Conceptualization, measurement, predictors, outcomes, and interventions in digital parenting research: A comprehensive umbrella review A meta-analysis of the correlation between teacher self-efficacy and teacher resilience: Concerted growth and contextual variance Unveiling the competencies at the core of lifelong learning: A systematic literature review A systematic review on how educators teach AI in K-12 education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1