Transparency and corruption: Measuring real transparency by a new index

IF 3.2 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW Regulation & Governance Pub Date : 2022-11-15 DOI:10.1111/rego.12502
Alina Mungiu-Pippidi
{"title":"Transparency and corruption: Measuring real transparency by a new index","authors":"Alina Mungiu-Pippidi","doi":"10.1111/rego.12502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the salience of transparency in policy and democracy debates a global measurement of transparency has always been missing. In its absence, measuring the impact of transparency on accountability and corruption for a large number of countries has been difficult, with scholars using more or less adequate proxies. This paper introduces a new measurement of real transparency—the T-index—using 14 <i>de facto</i> components, based on direct observations of official websites in 129 countries and five <i>de jure</i> components, based on the transparency laws and conventions adopted. The resulting index is a measurement with very good internal and external validity and moderate precision. The paper argues that <i>de facto</i> transparency must be considered alongside <i>de jure</i> (legal) transparency if we are to judge the impact (or lack of) transparency against accountability and corruption, as a large implementation gap exists, in particular in poor countries, between legal commitments and real transparency. The T-index has significant impact on both perception and objective indicators of corruption, including perceived change in corruption over time as measured by the Global Corruption Barometer. An analysis of outliers shows that high transparency alone is not sufficient to achieve control of corruption, especially in countries with low human development and poor rule of law, although transparency is a robust predictor of corruption with GDP controls. The data with all sources is available for download as T-index 2022 dataset: DOI 10.5281/zenodo.7225627 and an interactive webpage developed for updates is available at www.corruptionrisk.org/transparency.","PeriodicalId":21026,"journal":{"name":"Regulation & Governance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulation & Governance","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12502","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Despite the salience of transparency in policy and democracy debates a global measurement of transparency has always been missing. In its absence, measuring the impact of transparency on accountability and corruption for a large number of countries has been difficult, with scholars using more or less adequate proxies. This paper introduces a new measurement of real transparency—the T-index—using 14 de facto components, based on direct observations of official websites in 129 countries and five de jure components, based on the transparency laws and conventions adopted. The resulting index is a measurement with very good internal and external validity and moderate precision. The paper argues that de facto transparency must be considered alongside de jure (legal) transparency if we are to judge the impact (or lack of) transparency against accountability and corruption, as a large implementation gap exists, in particular in poor countries, between legal commitments and real transparency. The T-index has significant impact on both perception and objective indicators of corruption, including perceived change in corruption over time as measured by the Global Corruption Barometer. An analysis of outliers shows that high transparency alone is not sufficient to achieve control of corruption, especially in countries with low human development and poor rule of law, although transparency is a robust predictor of corruption with GDP controls. The data with all sources is available for download as T-index 2022 dataset: DOI 10.5281/zenodo.7225627 and an interactive webpage developed for updates is available at www.corruptionrisk.org/transparency.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
透明度与腐败:用一个新指数衡量真正的透明度
尽管透明度在政策和民主辩论中占有重要地位,但一直缺乏对透明度的全球衡量。在缺乏透明度的情况下,衡量透明度对许多国家的问责制和腐败的影响一直很困难,学者们使用了或多或少适当的代理。本文介绍了一种衡量实际透明度的新方法——t指数,它使用了基于对129个国家官方网站的直接观察的14个事实组成部分和基于所采用的透明度法律和公约的5个法律组成部分。该指标具有良好的内外效度和中等的精度。本文认为,如果我们要判断透明度对问责制和腐败的影响(或缺乏),就必须同时考虑事实上的透明度和法律上的透明度,因为在法律承诺和真正的透明度之间存在着巨大的执行差距,特别是在贫穷国家。t指数对腐败的感知和客观指标都有重大影响,包括全球腐败晴雨表(Global corruption Barometer)衡量的腐败随时间变化的感知。对异常值的分析表明,仅靠高透明度不足以实现对腐败的控制,特别是在人类发展水平低和法治不佳的国家,尽管透明度是GDP控制下腐败的有力预测指标。所有来源的数据可下载为T-index 2022数据集:DOI 10.5281/zenodo。7225627和为更新而开发的互动网页可在www.corruptionrisk.org/transparency上找到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: Regulation & Governance serves as the leading platform for the study of regulation and governance by political scientists, lawyers, sociologists, historians, criminologists, psychologists, anthropologists, economists and others. Research on regulation and governance, once fragmented across various disciplines and subject areas, has emerged at the cutting edge of paradigmatic change in the social sciences. Through the peer-reviewed journal Regulation & Governance, we seek to advance discussions between various disciplines about regulation and governance, promote the development of new theoretical and empirical understanding, and serve the growing needs of practitioners for a useful academic reference.
期刊最新文献
Procedural constraints and regulatory ossification in the US states Digitalization and the green transition: Different challenges, same policy responses? To sandbox or not to sandbox? Diverging strategies of regulatory responses to FinTech Self‐enforcing path dependent trajectories? A comparison of the implementation of the EU energy packages in Germany and the Netherlands From a cultural to a distributive issue: Public climate action as a new field for comparative political economy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1