Going Nordic—Can the Nordic model tackle grand challenges and be a beacon to follow?

IF 3.2 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW Regulation & Governance Pub Date : 2022-09-12 DOI:10.1111/rego.12494
Caroline de la Porte, Mads Dagnis Jensen, Jon Kvist
{"title":"Going Nordic—Can the Nordic model tackle grand challenges and be a beacon to follow?","authors":"Caroline de la Porte, Mads Dagnis Jensen, Jon Kvist","doi":"10.1111/rego.12494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nordic countries are known for having extensive welfare services, a highly compressed wage structure owing to strong social partners, as well as effective regulation and governance in public administration. Various typologies capture aspects of the institutional features of families of nations across various policy areas, showing that there is a specific Nordic variant of political economy. While there is an extensive literature focusing on socio-economic outcomes in the Nordic countries, there is less scholarly focus on the linkages between the regulatory processes, and their policy output, in response to various challenges. This volume examines how exogenous challenges (market liberalization promoted by EU integration and the gig economy, as well as the COVID-19 pandemic) and endogenous challenges in the welfare state (regulation of child-care quality and retirement ages) are tackled in a selection of Nordic countries. After a bibliometric analysis on the state of the literature, features of the Nordic model are presented. Then, the contributions of the articles to the special issue are summarized, after which lessons for other models of political economy are pinpointed. We find that although there is high variation within the Nordics in the studies of the special issue, there is a trend whereby, over time, a broader range of actors involved in the policy and regulatory process. Although not perfect, challenges are solved incrementally and often at an early stage. In other words, the Nordic regulatory model is highly adaptable to different challenges. Thus, the Nordic model does present crucial lessons for other types of political economy.","PeriodicalId":21026,"journal":{"name":"Regulation & Governance","volume":"2 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulation & Governance","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12494","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Nordic countries are known for having extensive welfare services, a highly compressed wage structure owing to strong social partners, as well as effective regulation and governance in public administration. Various typologies capture aspects of the institutional features of families of nations across various policy areas, showing that there is a specific Nordic variant of political economy. While there is an extensive literature focusing on socio-economic outcomes in the Nordic countries, there is less scholarly focus on the linkages between the regulatory processes, and their policy output, in response to various challenges. This volume examines how exogenous challenges (market liberalization promoted by EU integration and the gig economy, as well as the COVID-19 pandemic) and endogenous challenges in the welfare state (regulation of child-care quality and retirement ages) are tackled in a selection of Nordic countries. After a bibliometric analysis on the state of the literature, features of the Nordic model are presented. Then, the contributions of the articles to the special issue are summarized, after which lessons for other models of political economy are pinpointed. We find that although there is high variation within the Nordics in the studies of the special issue, there is a trend whereby, over time, a broader range of actors involved in the policy and regulatory process. Although not perfect, challenges are solved incrementally and often at an early stage. In other words, the Nordic regulatory model is highly adaptable to different challenges. Thus, the Nordic model does present crucial lessons for other types of political economy.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
走向北欧——北欧模式能解决巨大的挑战并成为效仿的灯塔吗?
北欧国家以拥有广泛的福利服务、由于强大的社会伙伴而高度压缩的工资结构以及有效的公共行政管制和治理而闻名。不同的类型学捕捉了不同政策领域的民族家庭制度特征的各个方面,表明存在一种特定的北欧政治经济学变体。虽然有大量文献关注北欧国家的社会经济结果,但较少关注监管过程与其政策产出之间的联系,以应对各种挑战。本卷探讨了在一些北欧国家如何应对外生挑战(欧盟一体化和零工经济推动的市场自由化,以及2019冠状病毒病大流行)和福利国家的内生挑战(对儿童保育质量和退休年龄的监管)。在对文献状况进行文献计量分析后,提出了北欧模式的特点。然后,对特刊文章的贡献进行总结,并指出对其他政治经济学模型的借鉴。我们发现,尽管北欧国家对特别问题的研究存在很大差异,但有一种趋势,即随着时间的推移,参与政策和监管过程的行为者范围越来越广。虽然不完美,但挑战是逐步解决的,而且通常是在早期阶段。换句话说,北欧的监管模式对不同的挑战具有很强的适应性。因此,北欧模式确实为其他类型的政治经济学提供了重要的经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: Regulation & Governance serves as the leading platform for the study of regulation and governance by political scientists, lawyers, sociologists, historians, criminologists, psychologists, anthropologists, economists and others. Research on regulation and governance, once fragmented across various disciplines and subject areas, has emerged at the cutting edge of paradigmatic change in the social sciences. Through the peer-reviewed journal Regulation & Governance, we seek to advance discussions between various disciplines about regulation and governance, promote the development of new theoretical and empirical understanding, and serve the growing needs of practitioners for a useful academic reference.
期刊最新文献
Scenes From a Sociolegal Career: An Informal Memoir Analysis of Institutional Design of European Union Cyber Incident and Crisis Management as a Complex Public Good The Political Influence of Proxy Advisors in Campaigns for Ethical Investment: Guiding the Invisible Hand Historical Foundations of Green Developmental Policies: Divergent Trajectories in United States and France Core funding and the performance of international organizations: Evidence from UNDP projects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1