Reconciling identity leadership and leader identity: A dual-identity framework

IF 9.1 1区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Leadership Quarterly Pub Date : 2022-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.leaqua.2022.101620
S. Alexander Haslam , Amber M. Gaffney , Michael A. Hogg , David E. Rast III , Niklas K. Steffens
{"title":"Reconciling identity leadership and leader identity: A dual-identity framework","authors":"S. Alexander Haslam ,&nbsp;Amber M. Gaffney ,&nbsp;Michael A. Hogg ,&nbsp;David E. Rast III ,&nbsp;Niklas K. Steffens","doi":"10.1016/j.leaqua.2022.101620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Research exploring the powerful links between leadership and identity has burgeoned in recent years but cohered around two distinct approaches. Research on <em>identity leadership</em>, the main focus of this special issue, sees leadership as a group process that centers on leaders’ ability to represent, advance, create and embed a social identity that they share with the collectives they lead—a sense of “us as a group”. Research on <em>leader identity</em> sees leadership as a process that is advanced by individuals who have a well-developed personal understanding of themselves as leaders—a sense of “me as a leader”. This article explores the nature and implications of these divergent approaches, focusing on their specification of profiles, processes, pathways, products, and philosophies that have distinct implications for theory and practice. We formalize our observations in a series of propositions and also outline a dual-identity framework with the potential to integrate the two approaches.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48434,"journal":{"name":"Leadership Quarterly","volume":"33 4","pages":"Article 101620"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leadership Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1048984322000236","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research exploring the powerful links between leadership and identity has burgeoned in recent years but cohered around two distinct approaches. Research on identity leadership, the main focus of this special issue, sees leadership as a group process that centers on leaders’ ability to represent, advance, create and embed a social identity that they share with the collectives they lead—a sense of “us as a group”. Research on leader identity sees leadership as a process that is advanced by individuals who have a well-developed personal understanding of themselves as leaders—a sense of “me as a leader”. This article explores the nature and implications of these divergent approaches, focusing on their specification of profiles, processes, pathways, products, and philosophies that have distinct implications for theory and practice. We formalize our observations in a series of propositions and also outline a dual-identity framework with the potential to integrate the two approaches.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调和身份领导与领导身份:双重身份框架
近年来,有关领导力和身份认同之间强大联系的研究层出不穷,但主要围绕两种截然不同的方法展开。作为本期特刊的主要焦点,对身份领导力的研究将领导力视为一个群体过程,其核心是领导者代表、推进、创造和嵌入他们与所领导的集体共享的社会身份的能力——一种“我们作为一个群体”的感觉。对领导者身份的研究认为,领导是一个过程,是由那些对自己作为领导者有良好的个人理解的人推进的——一种“我作为领导者”的感觉。本文探讨了这些不同方法的本质和含义,重点关注它们对理论和实践具有不同含义的概要、过程、途径、产品和哲学的说明。我们在一系列命题中形式化了我们的观察结果,并概述了一个具有整合两种方法潜力的双重身份框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
9.30%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: The Leadership Quarterly is a social-science journal dedicated to advancing our understanding of leadership as a phenomenon, how to study it, as well as its practical implications. Leadership Quarterly seeks contributions from various disciplinary perspectives, including psychology broadly defined (i.e., industrial-organizational, social, evolutionary, biological, differential), management (i.e., organizational behavior, strategy, organizational theory), political science, sociology, economics (i.e., personnel, behavioral, labor), anthropology, history, and methodology.Equally desirable are contributions from multidisciplinary perspectives.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Effects of women on corporate boards: An integrative review from a political capital perspective The business case for demographic diversity in strategic leadership teams: A systematic and critical review of the causal evidence Effect size benchmarks: Time for a causal renaissance Building foundations for explanatory theory and causally trustworthy evidence-based leadership
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1