A Fair Comparison: Women's and Men's Farms at Seven Scales in the United States☆

IF 2.3 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY RURAL SOCIOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-09-07 DOI:10.1111/ruso.12512
Katherine Dentzman, Paul Lewin
{"title":"A Fair Comparison: Women's and Men's Farms at Seven Scales in the United States☆","authors":"Katherine Dentzman, Paul Lewin","doi":"10.1111/ruso.12512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Successful farms—in the public imagination, agricultural policy, and more—tend to be highly profitable and operate at extremely large scales. Research has shown that women are less likely to operate these types of farms, possibly due to their preferences and lifestyle choices. There is evidence, however, that these gaps are additionally the result of differences in access to resources due to gender discrimination. Patterns of inequity in land inheritance and other resources limit women's farm size and choice of crops, and thus their opportunities to farm at larger, more profitable scales. Nonetheless, women farmers also employ creative strategies to make farming work for them. Our study uses 2017 Census of Agriculture data to compare women and men farmers at 7 different farm scales, revealing gendered strategies and comparing men and women farmers on equal footing. This presents a more nuanced picture of women's participation in farming at various scales. Overall, we find that within farm scales, women are often doing just as well as men—usually with fewer or different resources and approaches. Women's unbalanced representation at each farm scale, however, helps to explain why women are not always envisioned as “real farmers” in the popular conscience.","PeriodicalId":47924,"journal":{"name":"RURAL SOCIOLOGY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RURAL SOCIOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.12512","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Successful farms—in the public imagination, agricultural policy, and more—tend to be highly profitable and operate at extremely large scales. Research has shown that women are less likely to operate these types of farms, possibly due to their preferences and lifestyle choices. There is evidence, however, that these gaps are additionally the result of differences in access to resources due to gender discrimination. Patterns of inequity in land inheritance and other resources limit women's farm size and choice of crops, and thus their opportunities to farm at larger, more profitable scales. Nonetheless, women farmers also employ creative strategies to make farming work for them. Our study uses 2017 Census of Agriculture data to compare women and men farmers at 7 different farm scales, revealing gendered strategies and comparing men and women farmers on equal footing. This presents a more nuanced picture of women's participation in farming at various scales. Overall, we find that within farm scales, women are often doing just as well as men—usually with fewer or different resources and approaches. Women's unbalanced representation at each farm scale, however, helps to explain why women are not always envisioned as “real farmers” in the popular conscience.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一个公平的比较:美国女性和男性农场的七个尺度
成功的农场——在公众的想象中,在农业政策中,以及更多——往往是高利润的,而且经营规模非常大。研究表明,女性不太可能经营这类农场,可能是由于她们的偏好和生活方式的选择。然而,有证据表明,这些差距也是由于性别歧视导致的资源获取方面的差异造成的。土地继承和其他资源方面的不平等模式限制了妇女的农场规模和作物选择,从而限制了她们以更大、更有利可图的规模耕种的机会。尽管如此,女性农民也采用创造性的策略使农业为她们工作。我们的研究使用了2017年农业普查数据,比较了7个不同农场规模的女性和男性农民,揭示了性别策略,并在平等基础上比较了男性和女性农民。这显示了妇女在不同规模上参与农业的更细微的情况。总的来说,我们发现在农场规模内,女性通常做得和男性一样好——通常是用更少或不同的资源和方法。然而,女性在每个农场规模中所占比例的不平衡,有助于解释为什么在大众的良知中,女性并不总是被视为“真正的农民”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
RURAL SOCIOLOGY
RURAL SOCIOLOGY SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
13.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: A forum for cutting-edge research, Rural Sociology explores sociological and interdisciplinary approaches to emerging social issues and new approaches to recurring social issues affecting rural people and places. The journal is particularly interested in advancing sociological theory and welcomes the use of a wide range of social science methodologies. Manuscripts that use a sociological perspective to address the effects of local and global systems on rural people and places, rural community revitalization, rural demographic changes, rural poverty, natural resource allocations, the environment, food and agricultural systems, and related topics from all regions of the world are welcome. Rural Sociology also accepts papers that significantly advance the measurement of key sociological concepts or provide well-documented critical analysis of one or more theories as these measures and analyses are related to rural sociology.
期刊最新文献
Indigenous Perspectives on Dismantling the Legacies of Settler Colonialism in Rural Sociology☆ Energy Service Security for Public Health Resilience: Perception and Concerns in Western Upper Peninsula of Michigan☆ The Dignity of Nonworking Men* Family Farmers as Agents in the Struggle for Survival: A Case Study from Turkey☆ Shared Ideals, But Persistent Barriers: Improving Tribal‐University Research Engagement to Strengthen Native Nation Building and Rural Development☆
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1