Homophily, Setbacks, and the Dissolution of Heterogeneous Ties: Evidence from Professional Tennis

IF 2.7 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY Sociological Science Pub Date : 2023-03-24 DOI:10.15195/v10.a7
Xuege (Cathy) Lu, Shinan Wang, Letian Zhang
{"title":"Homophily, Setbacks, and the Dissolution of Heterogeneous Ties: Evidence from Professional Tennis","authors":"Xuege (Cathy) Lu, Shinan Wang, Letian Zhang","doi":"10.15195/v10.a7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Why do people engage with similar others despite ample opportunities to interact with dissimilar others? We argue that adversity or setbacks may have a stronger deteriorative effect on ties made up of dissimilar individuals, prompting people to give up on such ties more easily, which, over the long run, results in people forming ties with similar others. We examine this argument in the context of Association of Tennis Professionals tournaments, using data on 9,669 unique doubles pairs involving 1,812 unique players from 99 countries from 2000 to 2020. We find that doubles pairs with players from different countries are more likely to dissolve after a setback, especially if those countries lack social trust and connections with one another; this reality further contributes to the individual player's increased tendency to collaborate with same-country players in the next tournament. Our study has direct implications for interventions for diversity and inclusion.","PeriodicalId":22029,"journal":{"name":"Sociological Science","volume":"44 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociological Science","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15195/v10.a7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Why do people engage with similar others despite ample opportunities to interact with dissimilar others? We argue that adversity or setbacks may have a stronger deteriorative effect on ties made up of dissimilar individuals, prompting people to give up on such ties more easily, which, over the long run, results in people forming ties with similar others. We examine this argument in the context of Association of Tennis Professionals tournaments, using data on 9,669 unique doubles pairs involving 1,812 unique players from 99 countries from 2000 to 2020. We find that doubles pairs with players from different countries are more likely to dissolve after a setback, especially if those countries lack social trust and connections with one another; this reality further contributes to the individual player's increased tendency to collaborate with same-country players in the next tournament. Our study has direct implications for interventions for diversity and inclusion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
同质性、挫折与异质性关系的消解:来自职业网球的证据
尽管有很多机会与不同的人互动,为什么人们还是与相似的人交往?我们认为,逆境或挫折可能会对由不同个体组成的关系产生更强的恶化效应,促使人们更容易放弃这种关系,从长远来看,这导致人们与相似的人建立联系。我们在职业网球协会锦标赛的背景下检验了这一论点,使用了2000年至2020年来自99个国家的9669对独特双打的数据,涉及1812名独特的球员。我们发现,由不同国家选手组成的双打组合更有可能在遭遇挫折后解散,特别是当这些国家之间缺乏社会信任和联系时;这一现实进一步促进了个人球员在下一届比赛中更倾向于与本国球员合作。我们的研究对多样性和包容性的干预具有直接意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sociological Science
Sociological Science Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
2.90%
发文量
13
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Sociological Science is an open-access, online, peer-reviewed, international journal for social scientists committed to advancing a general understanding of social processes. Sociological Science welcomes original research and commentary from all subfields of sociology, and does not privilege any particular theoretical or methodological approach.
期刊最新文献
Some Birds Have Mixed Feathers: Bringing the Multiracial Population into the Study of Race Homophily Gender Segregation and Decision-Making in Undergraduate Course-Taking Social Status and the Moral Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence Can't Catch a Break: Intersectional Inequalities at Work. Money, Birth, Gender: Explaining Unequal Earnings Trajectories following Parenthood
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1