Dissecting the Lexis Table: Summarizing Population-Level Temporal Variability with Age–Period–Cohort Data

IF 2.7 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY Sociological Science Pub Date : 2023-03-13 DOI:10.15195/v10.a5
Ethan Fosse
{"title":"Dissecting the Lexis Table: Summarizing Population-Level Temporal Variability with Age–Period–Cohort Data","authors":"Ethan Fosse","doi":"10.15195/v10.a5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since Norman Ryder's (1965) classic essay on cohort analysis was published more than a half century ago, scores of researchers have attempted to uncover the separate effects of age, period, and cohort (APC) on a wide range of outcomes. However, rather than disentangling period effects from those attributable to age or cohort, Ryder's approach is based on distinguishing intra-cohort trends (or life-cycle change) from inter-cohort trends (or social change), which, together, constitute comparative cohort careers. Following Ryder's insights, in this article I show how to formally summarize population-level temporal variability on the Lexis table. In doing so, I present a number of parametric expressions representing intra- and inter-cohort trends, intra-period differences, and Ryderian comparative cohort careers. To aid the interpretation of results, I additionally introduce a suite of novel visualizations of these model-based summaries, including 2D and 3D Lexis heat maps. Crucially, the Ryderian approach developed in this article is fully identified, complementing (but not replacing) conventional approaches that rely on theoretical assumptions to parse out unique APC effects from unidentified models. This has the potential to provide a common base of knowledge in a literature often fraught with controversy. To illustrate, I analyze trends in social trust in the U.S. General Social Survey from 1972 to 2018.","PeriodicalId":22029,"journal":{"name":"Sociological Science","volume":"43 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociological Science","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15195/v10.a5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Since Norman Ryder's (1965) classic essay on cohort analysis was published more than a half century ago, scores of researchers have attempted to uncover the separate effects of age, period, and cohort (APC) on a wide range of outcomes. However, rather than disentangling period effects from those attributable to age or cohort, Ryder's approach is based on distinguishing intra-cohort trends (or life-cycle change) from inter-cohort trends (or social change), which, together, constitute comparative cohort careers. Following Ryder's insights, in this article I show how to formally summarize population-level temporal variability on the Lexis table. In doing so, I present a number of parametric expressions representing intra- and inter-cohort trends, intra-period differences, and Ryderian comparative cohort careers. To aid the interpretation of results, I additionally introduce a suite of novel visualizations of these model-based summaries, including 2D and 3D Lexis heat maps. Crucially, the Ryderian approach developed in this article is fully identified, complementing (but not replacing) conventional approaches that rely on theoretical assumptions to parse out unique APC effects from unidentified models. This has the potential to provide a common base of knowledge in a literature often fraught with controversy. To illustrate, I analyze trends in social trust in the U.S. General Social Survey from 1972 to 2018.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
剖析词汇表:用年龄-时期-队列数据总结人口水平时间变异性
自从半个多世纪前诺曼·莱德(Norman Ryder, 1965)关于队列分析的经典论文发表以来,许多研究人员试图揭示年龄、时期和队列(APC)对一系列结果的单独影响。然而,莱德的方法并没有将时期效应与年龄或队列效应分开,而是基于区分队列内趋势(或生命周期变化)与队列间趋势(或社会变化),这两种趋势共同构成了比较队列职业。根据Ryder的见解,在本文中,我将展示如何正式总结Lexis表上的人口级时间变异性。在此过程中,我提出了一些参数表达式,代表了队列内和队列间的趋势、时间段内的差异和Ryderian比较队列职业。为了帮助解释结果,我还介绍了一套新颖的基于模型的摘要可视化,包括2D和3D Lexis热图。至关重要的是,本文中开发的Ryderian方法是完全确定的,它补充(但不是取代)依赖于理论假设的传统方法,以从未识别的模型中解析出独特的APC效应。这有可能为经常充满争议的文学提供一个共同的知识基础。为了说明这一点,我分析了1972年至2018年美国综合社会调查中社会信任的趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sociological Science
Sociological Science Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
2.90%
发文量
13
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Sociological Science is an open-access, online, peer-reviewed, international journal for social scientists committed to advancing a general understanding of social processes. Sociological Science welcomes original research and commentary from all subfields of sociology, and does not privilege any particular theoretical or methodological approach.
期刊最新文献
Getting a Foot in the Door: A Meta-Analysis of U.S. Audit Studies of Gender Bias in Hiring The Risk Creates the Reward: Reputational Returns to Legal and Quality Risks in Online Illegal Drug Trade New OMB’s Race and Ethnicity Standards Will Affect How Americans Self-Identify The Diffusion and Reach of (Mis)Information on Facebook During the U.S. 2020 Election The Multiracial Complication: The 2020 Census and the Fictitious Multiracial Boom
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1