Do Organizational Policies Narrow Gender Inequality? Novel Evidence from Longitudinal Employer–Employee Data

IF 2.7 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY Sociological Science Pub Date : 2023-02-28 DOI:10.15195/v10.a2
Florian Zimmermann, Matthias Collischon
{"title":"Do Organizational Policies Narrow Gender Inequality? Novel Evidence from Longitudinal Employer–Employee Data","authors":"Florian Zimmermann, Matthias Collischon","doi":"10.15195/v10.a2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scholars have long proposed that gender inequalities in wages are narrowed by organizational policies to advance gender equality. Using cross-sectional data, scarce previous research has found an association between gender wage inequalities and these organizational policies, but it remains unclear whether this correlation represents a causal effect. We provide first evidence on this topic by using longitudinal linked employer–employee data covering almost 1,500 firms and nearly one million employee observations in Germany. We investigate whether and how organizational policies affect gender gaps using firm fixed-effects regressions. Our results show that organizational policies reduce the gender wage gap by around nine percent overall. Investigating channels, we show that this effect is entirely driven by advancing women already employed at a given firm, whereas we find no effect on firms' composition and wages of new hires. Furthermore, we show that our findings are not driven by potential sources of bias, such as reverse causality.","PeriodicalId":22029,"journal":{"name":"Sociological Science","volume":"40 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociological Science","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15195/v10.a2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Scholars have long proposed that gender inequalities in wages are narrowed by organizational policies to advance gender equality. Using cross-sectional data, scarce previous research has found an association between gender wage inequalities and these organizational policies, but it remains unclear whether this correlation represents a causal effect. We provide first evidence on this topic by using longitudinal linked employer–employee data covering almost 1,500 firms and nearly one million employee observations in Germany. We investigate whether and how organizational policies affect gender gaps using firm fixed-effects regressions. Our results show that organizational policies reduce the gender wage gap by around nine percent overall. Investigating channels, we show that this effect is entirely driven by advancing women already employed at a given firm, whereas we find no effect on firms' composition and wages of new hires. Furthermore, we show that our findings are not driven by potential sources of bias, such as reverse causality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
组织政策能缩小性别不平等吗?来自雇主-雇员纵向数据的新证据
长期以来,学者们一直提出,通过促进性别平等的组织政策,可以缩小工资方面的性别不平等。使用横断面数据,以前的研究很少发现性别工资不平等与这些组织政策之间的联系,但这种相关性是否代表因果关系尚不清楚。我们通过使用涵盖德国近1500家公司和近100万名员工观察的纵向关联雇主-雇员数据,为这一主题提供了第一个证据。我们使用公司固定效应回归来调查组织政策是否以及如何影响性别差距。我们的研究结果表明,组织政策总体上减少了约9%的性别工资差距。通过调查渠道,我们发现这种影响完全是由在给定公司中晋升女性员工所驱动的,而我们发现对公司的构成和新员工的工资没有影响。此外,我们表明我们的发现不是由潜在的偏见来源驱动的,例如反向因果关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sociological Science
Sociological Science Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
2.90%
发文量
13
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Sociological Science is an open-access, online, peer-reviewed, international journal for social scientists committed to advancing a general understanding of social processes. Sociological Science welcomes original research and commentary from all subfields of sociology, and does not privilege any particular theoretical or methodological approach.
期刊最新文献
New OMB’s Race and Ethnicity Standards Will Affect How Americans Self-Identify The Diffusion and Reach of (Mis)Information on Facebook During the U.S. 2020 Election The Multiracial Complication: The 2020 Census and the Fictitious Multiracial Boom Opportunities for Faculty Tenure at Globally Ranked Universities: Cross-National Differences by Gender, Fields, and Tenure Status Some Birds Have Mixed Feathers: Bringing the Multiracial Population into the Study of Race Homophily
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1